Unfair modding part 2

[jedi~tank]

Some mods issue warnings and such to players they dont like..not all mods, some are actually good, but some do so as I said and let others slide that they do like. And who warns the mods? Who repremands the mewer ones/ the blue ones?

OK so if mods cannot be fair across the board, then maybe they shouldnt be. OK Im not a mod hater but I do not care for unfariness. I dont like being victim of it and I dont like seeing others abused or bullied on these forums by a moderator.

[jedi~tank]

My post isnt about Clarkey, and your reply is EXACTLY the reason I made this thread. Now what you gonna do? give me a warning?

[~[ Greased Gerbil ]~]

Seeing as this is not dealing with a specific dispute between a member and the mod team, there is nothing here for the ombudsman to mediate.

I think this belongs in the mod feedback section.

[RoKeT]

i have to agree with JT, unfortunatly Tetris you just proved it right there, with your posts, and the sad thing is you were doing so good! like i don't understand i was just talking highly about you, how you were a fair mod and i respected what you were doing, there are few i do respect few i find fair you WERE one of them, but with rescent events you've changed into just like the rest, SS is another good man he is a fair mod, Deni has never in my opinion done anything wrong, and Universe, even though i hate her sometimes she has given me chance after chance to change... those are the few the proud and the only mods that are fair in my book, no offense to some i have never delt with so don't take it offensive if i did not mention you, but to be honest... Mods treat users like crap now... they slander and bring us down... when is enough enough... it is Admins job to stop this... so please someone step up and do something...

[Clarkey]

If I may, please post said posts or actions taken by said mod, along with proof backing your claims.

Making wild accusations gets us no where, so lets get the facts first before we start jumping on the band wagon Clarkey.

I'd prefer it if you do not personally bring me in to this issue if it has nothing to do with me.
It is about the Mods, you bringing my name in it is a clear attempt to flaim this thread.

Ombudsman i hope you see where i am coming from.

[zeekomkommer]

Seeing as this is not dealing with a specific dispute between a member and the mod team, there is nothing here for the ombudsman to mediate.

I think this belongs in the mod feedback section.

what he said, moved to the forum discussion section a mod there will designate it to the propper section.

ombudsman topics are about a specific dispute and not a general one. if you have complaints about moderators wich you want to bring to the admins atention then i suggest you contact admin earandil who is responsible for the moderators on this forum

[Jack]

ombudsman topics are about a specific dispute and not a general one.

Bull **Filtered**, but all things considered, continue as you are.

[deni]

Seeing as this is not dealing with a specific dispute between a member and the mod team, there is nothing here for the ombudsman to mediate.

I think this belongs in the mod feedback section.

what he said, moved to the forum discussion section a mod there will designate it to the propper section.

ombudsman topics are about a specific dispute and not a general one. if you have complaints about moderators wich you want to bring to the admins atention then i suggest you contact admin earandil who is responsible for the moderators on this forum

As far as I am aware, the 3 admin system with admins having different roles has been changed.

There is no separate communications, players and mod admin anymore as every admin fills in every role.

That is the reason that we went back from a 3 + 1 admin system to a 2 + 1 with the +1 being the tech Admin Baszy

[Juliette]

Good thread. Very true and valid.
Also; deni is right, there's no separation between the admins, save perhaps the resident geek from Hungary. *grin*

[Caprila]

It's very easy to make generalized statements that the mods are biased or not modding well.

It's harder to provide a few examples of what you mean & back up what you're saying.


As to your question regarding new mods, we don't just let them run amock from day 1, if that's what you're thinking Their sectional gm works closely with them to look at each rule and keep them on the right track.

Yet another topic that would no doubt have been solved more easily by pm to their sectional gm or admin..

[Clarkey]

I never directly involved you, just as I explained to JT, its about making wild accusations about mods without any justification with sound evidence. Stop thinking everything I say directly involves you Clarkey.

The last thing you said did directly involve me cause you said my damn name.
There was no need to drag my name in to the thread, you could have easily said the same thing without mentioning me.

Leave me alone and stop putting my name in threads where it is not needed.

[zeekomkommer]

to ad:


JT, if you can come with clear examples that prove what you claim then you can bring this to the ombudsman office and then me and jim will bring it up with the admins. (or you can take it to the admins yourself)

but i do sugest you talk with the moderators in question first to settle things

[Duderanch]

I never directly involved you, just as I explained to JT, its about making wild accusations about mods without any justification with sound evidence. Stop thinking everything I say directly involves you Clarkey.

The last thing you said did directly involve me cause you said my damn name.
There was no need to drag my name in to the thread, you could have easily said the same thing without mentioning me.

Leave me alone and stop putting my name in threads where it is not needed.

Just to point out, Tetris could have made the connection to you as if i'm not mistaken, you had a thread here called 'unfair modding'. This thread is called, Unfair modding part 2. It's not really that much of a stretch...

[Clarkey]

I never directly involved you, just as I explained to JT, its about making wild accusations about mods without any justification with sound evidence. Stop thinking everything I say directly involves you Clarkey.

The last thing you said did directly involve me cause you said my damn name.
There was no need to drag my name in to the thread, you could have easily said the same thing without mentioning me.

Leave me alone and stop putting my name in threads where it is not needed.

Just to point out, Tetris could have made the connection to you as if i'm not mistaken, you had a thread here called 'unfair modding'. This thread is called, Unfair modding part 2. It's not really that much of a stretch...

I'd also just like to point out, seeing as you were allowed to as well, that although i made a thread called Unfair Modding which you suggest tetris may have used to make the connection to me, he was referring to people making wild accusations, however my Unfair Modding thread was about Tetris abusing his powers to dump any posts that i made. So that makes it a failed connection. I still stand by the fact that there was absolutely no need for Tetris to mention me in this thread. Thank you.

[Empy]

Stop. Next off-topic post gets a warning.

~Empy

-----

To the topic at hand... as has been said a few times already. Either get some evidence and name people or this thread is pointless. For the record I think you're wrong and probably won't find any evidence, but to each their own...