Competition vs. Technological Advancements
Posted: Fri Jan 08, 2010 9:17 pm
Heres what I though of, while i was writing something few years ago..
is Competition the only reason why we have new discoveries?
imagine a world with one king, a total ruler. A world like that has no enemies, and noone to fight.
Would such a world ever advance?
I think the answer is no.. I think competition is the only cause of advancements and discoveries. Its one of the only things that motivates people.. therefore Competition acts as a catalyst. the discoveries would happen eventually, but competition works as a catalyst on people and makes them occur faster..
Is there anything else that can make new discoveries?
Edit: after writing this,, i think theres somethign else.. a common future goal, this can motivate people to work towards it..
so apart from these two, is there anything else?
is Competition the only reason why we have new discoveries?
imagine a world with one king, a total ruler. A world like that has no enemies, and noone to fight.
Would such a world ever advance?
I think the answer is no.. I think competition is the only cause of advancements and discoveries. Its one of the only things that motivates people.. therefore Competition acts as a catalyst. the discoveries would happen eventually, but competition works as a catalyst on people and makes them occur faster..
Is there anything else that can make new discoveries?
Edit: after writing this,, i think theres somethign else.. a common future goal, this can motivate people to work towards it..
so apart from these two, is there anything else?