StarGateWars Forums

Kit-Fox wrote:Yes looking at the cold hard facts there is only one conclusion, neither side deserves the land and both should be thrown off it.

Hitchkok's PM wrote:please keep your posts constructive.
this is spam.
i'm not reporting it, but please delete it.

No its not spam, its an opinion. The very thing you asked for when you asked people what they think about the situation, just because you dont like it or appreciate it does not make it invalid or spam. Next time keep your threats to yourself!

EDIT: You are more than welcome to disagree with the opinion, but someone such as yourself should be appalled at yourself for trying to act in a manner similar to those who do/have take(n) part in the censorship act of book burning around the world/throughout history.

oh, please.
"trying to act in a manner similar to those who do/have take(n) part in the censorship act of book burning"?
for what? asking you to post constructively?
this is an opinion, i'll give you that, but the way it is presented is such that makes it not contributive to the discussion.
and, as you yourself, in this very thread, admitted a similar remark to be only a "rather light-hearted throw away comment", one could very well understand my standpoint.
i've sent you a PM not because i have anything to hide. i don't. i sent a PM because i didn't think my request was anymore contributive than the remark itself. apperantly you think i was wrong. but calling me a censor?
that's just twisting the facts.

While quite clearly the suggestion that the mandate should not have ended was rather throw away as in not serious because of the history surrounding the mandate, my latest comment has none of the surrounding history to suggest that is in jest or light-hearted ergo one should assume it is a valid and on-topic opinion.

You might also have considered asking first if the comment was a throw away one & of a light-hearted manner or not first.

Again if you dont like it say so, but to try and force censorship is a disgusting tactic and one someone of your heritage should be ashamed to be taking part in.

Hitchkoks PM wrote:i'm just wondering why you couldn't have kept this to PMs until we have resolved it beetwen us. i really can't see how this is contributive in any way to the discussion.

enjoy

EDIT

Hitchkok wrote:i'm still wondering.

Quite simple really, you tried to strong-arm me into deleting my opinion, threats should be seen by the rest of the community so they can see your character for themselves. Not my fault if your actions reflect badly on you

EDIT2:

Its whats known as an implied threat, i suggest you look it up. Using polite language doesnt make it any less of a threat. The threat of censorship is one you've just made again btw by saying you will ask the mods to delete these posts in your latest edit.

I also reject the assertion that these posts are not on topic, there are most certainly on topic, you are trying to stifle opinions of those participating in the thread. The very thing you asked for in your first post!

Your also starting to get personal with insulting phrases

but i do beleive that as they can read just as well (if not better...) than you

You might want to consider that, as it is against the general forum rules.

i'm still wondering.

EDIT:
strongarm?
threat?
let's qoute this again:

Hitchkok wrote:please keep your posts constructive.
this is spam.
i'm not reporting it, but please delete it.

where is the strongarming? in the "please"?
where is the threat?
i appreaciete your concern for the education of the community regarding my character, but i do beleive that as they can read just as well (if not better...) than you, they can judge me for themselves.
now, as this is getting to be clean cut apam (my character isn't the topic of this debate...) i will stop responding to these accusation. i will also ask a mod to move the last few posts (excluding the original one) to where ever they see fit.
if you see fit, make a new thread regarding my character.