Page 1 of 1

So much for that sig rule

Posted: Mon Feb 22, 2010 12:34 pm
by Jack
You guys threw a **Filtered** fit for.

Re: So much for that sig rule

Posted: Mon Feb 22, 2010 12:45 pm
by Jim
you talking about clarkeys provocative avatar?
or the amount of sigs over size limit?

Re: So much for that sig rule

Posted: Mon Feb 22, 2010 12:49 pm
by Jack
Man Called Jim wrote:or the amount of sigs over size limit?

That. *cough*

Though you bring up a good point about Clarkey's avatar, it's not safe for the children. [-X

Re: So much for that sig rule

Posted: Mon Feb 22, 2010 12:52 pm
by Clarkey
Dr. House wrote:You guys threw a **Filtered** fit for.

Let me clear something up here...... it was not "us" guys that threw a **Filtered** fit for it.

it was Zeratul that threw a **Filtered** fit for it. He's the one that suggested it, he's the one that pushed for it. I accepted it cause I couldn't bothered with him going on about it. in fact it's probably the only actual decision he's made, so good for him.

Dr. House wrote:Though you bring up a good point about Clarkey's avatar, it's not safe for the children.

As for my Avy there's nothing wrong with it. [-X

Re: So much for that sig rule

Posted: Mon Feb 22, 2010 12:59 pm
by moses
Clarkey wrote:
Dr. House wrote:You guys threw a **Filtered** fit for.

Let me clear something up here...... it was not "us" guys that threw a **Filtered** fit for it.

it was Zeratul that threw a **Filtered** fit for it. He's the one that suggested it, he's the one that pushed for it. I accepted it cause I couldn't bothered with him going on about it. in fact it's probably the only actual decision he's made, so good for him.

Dr. House wrote:Though you bring up a good point about Clarkey's avatar, it's not safe for the children.

As for my Avy there's nothing wrong with it. [-X


I agree it is verry classy clarkey :)

Re: So much for that sig rule

Posted: Mon Feb 22, 2010 1:01 pm
by Jack
Clarkey wrote:
Dr. House wrote:You guys threw a **Filtered** fit for.

Let me clear something up here...... it was not "us" guys that threw a **Filtered** fit for it.

it was Zeratul that threw a **Filtered** fit for it. He's the one that suggested it, he's the one that pushed for it. I accepted it cause I couldn't bothered with him going on about it. in fact it's probably the only actual decision he's made, so good for him.

Wasn't just Zeratul, but this thread wasn't necessarily aimed at you, either. But more along the lines of anyone on the mod team that actually wanted this rule.

Clarkey wrote:As for my Avy there's nothing wrong with it. [-X

Normally I would agree with you, but ya know, with the new rules and all...

Re: So much for that sig rule

Posted: Mon Feb 22, 2010 1:03 pm
by Jim
Dr. House wrote:
Clarkey wrote:As for my Avy there's nothing wrong with it. [-X

Normally I would agree with you, but ya know, with the new rules and all...

Its about as bad as the lesbian thread :-k

Re: So much for that sig rule

Posted: Mon Feb 22, 2010 1:05 pm
by Empy
Really a pointless thread... try reporting the sigs over 450pix rather than just saving them for ammo against the Mod Team. That'd be more productive, if you actually cared...

Re: So much for that sig rule

Posted: Mon Feb 22, 2010 1:05 pm
by moses
Man Called Jim wrote:
Dr. House wrote:
Clarkey wrote:As for my Avy there's nothing wrong with it. [-X

Normally I would agree with you, but ya know, with the new rules and all...

Its about as bad as the lesbian thread :-k


:shock: since when was it bad :smt047

Re: So much for that sig rule

Posted: Mon Feb 22, 2010 1:07 pm
by Clarkey
Man Called Jim wrote:
Dr. House wrote:
Clarkey wrote:As for my Avy there's nothing wrong with it. [-X

Normally I would agree with you, but ya know, with the new rules and all...

Its about as bad as the lesbian thread :-k

Hardly. It's a girl wearing a skirt..... surely under 13's don't walk around this world with their eyes closed in case they see a girl with a skirt.

It's in no way as bad as the lesbian thread.

Sarajevo wrote:Really a pointless thread... try reporting the sigs over 450pix rather than just saving them for ammo against the Mod Team. That'd be more productive, if you actually cared...

Agreed.

Re: So much for that sig rule

Posted: Mon Feb 22, 2010 1:39 pm
by Juliette
SuperSaiyan wrote:
Sarajevo wrote:Really a pointless thread... try reporting the sigs over 450pix rather than just saving them for ammo against the Mod Team. That'd be more productive, if you actually cared...


Agreed, if you find a sig breaking the hieght limit, report it to your friendly neighborhood spiderman and it'll get taken care of accordingly...
The resident Spidermen will go after the culprits. We're not omniscient, and not omnipresent, but we will work as quickly as possible. Just see if you could PM an online mod/GM, and it'll be taken up pretty quickly. ;) I'm sure.


Case closed. You know how to deal with the sigs that you feel are offensive / rulebreaking / not noticed by staff.
I trust that settles that. If not, PM me / General mod / GM to unlock, thanks!.