Page 1 of 1

multi + planet def glitcher

Posted: Fri May 07, 2010 5:50 am
by eTeps
wraithx id=1966763 appears to be a multi for some1. never ascennded, 130,000 UP with 10 planets of 59k to 66k UP planets (monstrs size)and only appears in normal realm when its population will drop and then go hiding in perg realm again. attack & def stats @ 0.

attempts to nik a planet ends up destroying all fleets from PLANETARY BASED DEFs when spy'd it shows all planets have 0 def before and after attempts to conqour.

any1 come accross this glitch / hack before? who ever set it up is getting some major resources through this cheat.

Re: multi + planet def glitcher

Posted: Fri May 07, 2010 5:52 am
by Juliette
That 'planet def glitch' is a platform. It's substantial enough to kill your fleets, apparently.
He has 3 of them, in all likelihood.



As for thingy, wraithx.
He's a multi of guardianx and phantomx, as far as I know.
Thought he was banned, actually. CLARKEY! Remember this one? ;)

Re: multi + planet def glitcher

Posted: Fri May 07, 2010 6:04 am
by LegendaryA
GuardianX ingame was Sub_Zero as far as I remember, if that is of any help.

Re: multi + planet def glitcher

Posted: Fri May 07, 2010 6:05 am
by Solus
Juliette wrote:As for thingy, wraithx.
He's a multi of guardianx and phantomx, as far as I know.
Thought he was banned, actually. CLARKEY! Remember this one? ;)


-_-

I'd appreciate someone looking into this, WraithX was my old ingame name before I quit, I'd appreciate it if my alias wasn't dragged through the dirt. I dont play SGW anymore but I'd like to keep the friendships and reputation intact.

~soul

Re: multi + planet def glitcher

Posted: Fri May 07, 2010 6:06 am
by Juliette
Juliette wrote:That 'planet def glitch' is a platform. It's substantial enough to kill your fleets, apparently.
He has 3 of them, in all likelihood.
Sorry, I misread your message. I'll see if I can figure this one out. :-D

Re: multi + planet def glitcher

Posted: Fri May 07, 2010 6:13 am
by Clarkey
Juliette wrote:As for thingy, wraithx.
He's a multi of guardianx and phantomx, as far as I know.
Thought he was banned, actually. CLARKEY! Remember this one? ;)

I remember guardianx, but I know nothing of wraithx?

Re: multi + planet def glitcher

Posted: Fri May 07, 2010 6:17 am
by Juliette
Clarkey wrote:
Juliette wrote:As for thingy, wraithx.
He's a multi of guardianx and phantomx, as far as I know.
Thought he was banned, actually. CLARKEY! Remember this one? ;)
I remember guardianx, but I know nothing of wraithx?
Oh.. indeed. I seem to have made another mistake. These aren't connected.. it is a mystery.

Re: multi + planet def glitcher

Posted: Fri May 07, 2010 6:18 am
by eTeps
thanks for the quick response, the attack logs say planet based. no notes stating sattelite + % of force from.

Re: multi + planet def glitcher

Posted: Fri May 07, 2010 6:19 am
by LegendaryA
I think Solus made a mistake when he chose wraithX as name, given the troubles revolving around this damn GuardianX. :shock:

Re: multi + planet def glitcher

Posted: Fri May 07, 2010 9:00 am
by eTeps
subs gone into perg and attempted to take a planet with success! but says an attempt on planet kk in normal realm had faild due to planet ground based def facilitys. but spy said none there.

Re: multi + planet def glitcher

Posted: Fri May 07, 2010 9:32 am
by Clarkey
eTeps wrote:subs gone into perg and attempted to take a planet with success! but says an attempt on planet kk in normal realm had faild due to planet ground based def facilitys. but spy said none there.

subs? You mean Wraithx? :?

Re: multi + planet def glitcher

Posted: Sat May 08, 2010 7:02 am
by Juliette
Clarkey wrote:
eTeps wrote:subs gone into perg and attempted to take a planet with success! but says an attempt on planet kk in normal realm had faild due to planet ground based def facilitys. but spy said none there.
subs? You mean Wraithx? :?
Either "subject" or "Sub_Zero" in which case eTeps would be continuing the mistake I made by using Jim's failed reply to me.