Page 1 of 3
warning for a not masked word?
Posted: Mon May 31, 2010 7:56 am
by bebita
Ferra wrote:The following is a warning which has been issued to you by an administrator or moderator of this site.
no
everyone is ashamed that players like u are in this game
i quess r8 thamuz and the other brave tl guys history and respect they earned they protect u people to ask if it is help need it and not jumping directly to play with u
don't fool yourself whoever prick u are
u are nobody
5.b. Profanity
The use of profanity on the SGW forums is prohibited at all times. This means swearing, cursing and vulgarity. This includes the use of masking. SGW is a family orientated game and as such the language used must be suitable for children.
5.c. Abuse / Racism
Members of the SGW community are required to speak courteously to others. Personal attacks on members are not tolerated. This includes comments about one’s sex, gender, skin colour, religion or cultural heritage. You may not post personal information about another user regardless of how it was obtained. This includes their address, phone numbers, names or any other detail about their real life status that they have not already posted on the SGW forums their selves. For exceptions to this rule please see the role playing section
if the word prick is a profanity why is not masked?
Re: warning for a not masked word?
Posted: Mon May 31, 2010 8:10 am
by Clarkey
bebita wrote:Ferra wrote:The following is a warning which has been issued to you by an administrator or moderator of this site.
no
everyone is ashamed that players like u are in this game
i quess r8 thamuz and the other brave tl guys history and respect they earned they protect u people to ask if it is help need it and not jumping directly to play with u
don't fool yourself whoever prick u are
u are nobody
5.b. Profanity
The use of profanity on the SGW forums is prohibited at all times. This means swearing, cursing and vulgarity. This includes the use of masking. SGW is a family orientated game and as such the language used must be suitable for children.
5.c. Abuse / Racism
Members of the SGW community are required to speak courteously to others. Personal attacks on members are not tolerated. This includes comments about one’s sex, gender, skin colour, religion or cultural heritage. You may not post personal information about another user regardless of how it was obtained. This includes their address, phone numbers, names or any other detail about their real life status that they have not already posted on the SGW forums their selves. For exceptions to this rule please see the role playing section
if the word prick is a profanity why is not masked?
You want every profane word (and it's variations) masked?
Re: warning for a not masked word?
Posted: Mon May 31, 2010 8:13 am
by Q Man
because it could, on occasion, be used in non insulting references.
also, do you want you warning revoked or just to have it put in the filter, because your warning also entails abuse, which is clearly evident in the post.
Re: warning for a not masked word?
Posted: Mon May 31, 2010 8:40 am
by Jack
Clarkey wrote:You want every profane word (and it's variations) masked?
The filter has already done that in a
very half assed capacity...
For instance you can say penis but not **Filtered**(di
ck), you can say vagina but not **Filtered**(p
ussy).
So yes. Either that, or you cut the fat from the filter.
Also, I disagree that he deserves a warning for calling someone a prick.
Re: warning for a not masked word?
Posted: Mon May 31, 2010 9:59 am
by bebita
and what words they are connsidered profanity?
srry if my english is not perfect but i always considered prick has the same meaning as idiot
and i reported word idiot but no meassure was taken because english users didn't considered it idiot like a profanity word
please someone enlight me because i do not intend to broke forum rulles and counting everyday i discover new things i am in danger to get banned on forums without wanting to broke forum rulles
Re: warning for a not masked word?
Posted: Mon May 31, 2010 10:20 am
by Mordack
I agree with Jack.
Re: warning for a not masked word?
Posted: Mon May 31, 2010 10:32 am
by bebita
can someone answer to my questioin please
thanks
Re: warning for a not masked word?
Posted: Mon May 31, 2010 10:36 am
by Jack
Dr. House wrote:Also, I disagree that he deserves a warning for calling someone a prick.
Re: warning for a not masked word?
Posted: Mon May 31, 2010 11:03 am
by Byrnes
Bebita i wouldent even try i got a warning for calling myself a prick
Re: warning for a not masked word?
Posted: Mon May 31, 2010 1:40 pm
by bebita
Dr. House wrote:Dr. House wrote:Also, I disagree that he deserves a warning for calling someone a prick.
](./images/smilies/eusa_wall.gif "Brick wall")
i did not read properly what u sayed
Re: warning for a not masked word?
Posted: Mon May 31, 2010 2:36 pm
by Empy
Where's the line between a little abuse that's fine, and where you cross over and it's too much and deserves a warning? I hope no one is arguing that calling someone else a "prick" is not abuse, along with the rest of what he said..
Re: warning for a not masked word?
Posted: Mon May 31, 2010 2:43 pm
by Rottenking
im not a prick, so calling me one is offensive
Re: warning for a not masked word?
Posted: Mon May 31, 2010 3:38 pm
by Jack
Empy wrote:Where's the line between a little abuse that's fine, and where you cross over and it's too much and deserves a warning? I hope no one is arguing that calling someone else a "prick" is not abuse, along with the rest of what he said..
No more so than
this.
Re: warning for a not masked word?
Posted: Mon May 31, 2010 5:18 pm
by Empy
Dr. House wrote:Empy wrote:Where's the line between a little abuse that's fine, and where you cross over and it's too much and deserves a warning? I hope no one is arguing that calling someone else a "prick" is not abuse, along with the rest of what he said..
No more so than
this.
Calling someone an idiot is abuse, and if I was supreme forum overlord it would be warned for. I have warned for it in the past, but it was overturned (I took it back). How about debate now? Prove how either of them are not abuse and therefore not against the rules.
Re: warning for a not masked word?
Posted: Tue Jun 01, 2010 6:49 pm
by bebita
Empy wrote:Dr. House wrote:Empy wrote:Where's the line between a little abuse that's fine, and where you cross over and it's too much and deserves a warning? I hope no one is arguing that calling someone else a "prick" is not abuse, along with the rest of what he said..
No more so than
this.
Calling someone an idiot is abuse, and if I was supreme forum overlord it would be warned for. I have warned for it in the past, but it was overturned (I took it back). How about debate now? Prove how either of them are not abuse and therefore not against the rules.
k i can admitt i deserve the warn for calling someone a prick
but where u was when i was made idiot?
i reported and someone told me idiot is not abusive and i bellieved ...
prick idiot imbecil kinda same things isn't it?
and after all all i want to know where is that line?
i bellieve more mods should read and make a agreement if this words are allowed on forums because i admitt i don't like to see them around