StarGateWars Forums

yesterday for spamming...?

prob Juliette she did same to me

it does not matter whom it was... warning was later retracted by the admins, so in the forum systems, the warning does not exist...

you were banned because of the thread you posted in golden wing, despite it being filled with warnings that each post in it qualified for a warning... that was not the case with jedi~tank... there is no such thread currently, nor was there one yesterday...

Zeratul wrote:it does not matter whom it was... warning was later retracted by the admins, so in the forum systems, the warning does not exist...

you were banned because of the thread you posted in golden wing, despite it being filled with warnings that each post in it qualified for a warning... that was not the case with jedi~tank... there is no such thread currently, nor was there one yesterday...

ahh sorry fr the comment then.

just to add that that thread was in "spam" so i shouldn't have 2 extra warning for replying to "SPAM"?

anyways thanks.

with all due respect it matters to me

Zeratul wrote:it does not matter whom it was... warning was later retracted by the admins, so in the forum systems, the warning does not exist...

you were banned because of the thread you posted in golden wing, despite it being filled with warnings that each post in it qualified for a warning... that was not the case with jedi~tank... there is no such thread currently, nor was there one yesterday...

How is someone spposed to sort out problems or issues if they don't even know who is doing what?

Sounds like a cover up...

You people make me sick...

It is no cover-up... do not try to find cover-ups where there are none...

It truly does not matter who issued the ban. It was a regular 3rd warning ban, but was canceled when the warning was revoked. It does not matter who issued a non-existent warning/ban. Any such problems as may be, are being dealt with internally in the mod team. Any mod/admin involved there knows this.
Since there was not sufficient basis for the warning, the user in question does not need to change his/her behavior on that front.

Zeratul wrote:It is no cover-up... do not try to find cover-ups where there are none...

It truly does not matter who issued the ban. It was a regular 3rd warning ban, but was canceled when the warning was revoked. It does not matter who issued a non-existent warning/ban. Any such problems as may be, are being dealt with internally in the mod team. Any mod/admin involved there knows this.
Since there was not sufficient basis for the warning, the user in question does not need to change his/her behavior on that front.

I bet it was you and you are covering your ass... How about the mod that gave a wrning and subequently banned him is made to apollogze, that sounds fair to me, that person may well have ruined his night for all you know...

You still make me sick...

Jedi~Tank wrote:yesterday for spamming...?

JT, if you actually received a warning that resulted in the ban (before it was revoked) then you should have an auto PM regarding the warning. This would tell you who issued the warning. It would be the warning that would have resulted in the banning of your account.

Therefore is it not the person that made the warning that is of importance rather than the person that banned your account? because the banning would have resulted from the warning?

RepliJake wrote:You still make me sick...

Shut up Jake.

Empy
Property of Jack

I find your comment oppressive...

RepliJake wrote:I find your comment oppressive...

lol your such an instagator you remind me of my dad its a riot

RepliJake wrote:

Zeratul wrote:It is no cover-up... do not try to find cover-ups where there are none...

It truly does not matter who issued the ban. It was a regular 3rd warning ban, but was canceled when the warning was revoked. It does not matter who issued a non-existent warning/ban. Any such problems as may be, are being dealt with internally in the mod team. Any mod/admin involved there knows this.
Since there was not sufficient basis for the warning, the user in question does not need to change his/her behavior on that front.

I bet it was you and you are covering your ass... How about the mod that gave a wrning and subequently banned him is made to apollogze, that sounds fair to me, that person may well have ruined his night for all you know...

You still make me sick...

I'm glad his ass is covered. Now mine.. I only cover up what we sweep under the rug. It's filthy, trust me.
Here, have a bucket. It'll help contain the sickness.



And JT? Shush. You were banned for what, 2 hours? I think that shows how incredibly important this must be.

Juliette wrote:

RepliJake wrote:

Zeratul wrote:It is no cover-up... do not try to find cover-ups where there are none...

It truly does not matter who issued the ban. It was a regular 3rd warning ban, but was canceled when the warning was revoked. It does not matter who issued a non-existent warning/ban. Any such problems as may be, are being dealt with internally in the mod team. Any mod/admin involved there knows this.
Since there was not sufficient basis for the warning, the user in question does not need to change his/her behavior on that front.

I bet it was you and you are covering your ass... How about the mod that gave a wrning and subequently banned him is made to apollogze, that sounds fair to me, that person may well have ruined his night for all you know...

You still make me sick...

I'm glad his ass is covered. Now mine.. I only cover up what we sweep under the rug. It's filthy, trust me.
Here, have a bucket. It'll help contain the sickness.



And JT? Shush. You were banned for what, 2 hours? I think that shows how incredibly important this must be.

Don't get me started on you Elladan...

That's just beyond sick...

People don't forget you know...

Juliette wrote:

RepliJake wrote:

Zeratul wrote:It is no cover-up... do not try to find cover-ups where there are none...

It truly does not matter who issued the ban. It was a regular 3rd warning ban, but was canceled when the warning was revoked. It does not matter who issued a non-existent warning/ban. Any such problems as may be, are being dealt with internally in the mod team. Any mod/admin involved there knows this.
Since there was not sufficient basis for the warning, the user in question does not need to change his/her behavior on that front.

I bet it was you and you are covering your ass... How about the mod that gave a wrning and subequently banned him is made to apollogze, that sounds fair to me, that person may well have ruined his night for all you know...

You still make me sick...

I'm glad his ass is covered. Now mine.. I only cover up what we sweep under the rug. It's filthy, trust me.
Here, have a bucket. It'll help contain the sickness.



And JT? Shush. You were banned for what, 2 hours? I think that shows how incredibly important this must be.

I was just asking