StarGateWars Forums

what do you know about it?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bilderberg
Pretty much a meeting of people that decide things...

what i know:


founded in 1954, by Prince Bernhard, a Nazi SS officer. the Bilderberg Group holds (by invitation only) annual meetings of the rich and powerful. about 2/3rds of the attendees are European, the rest American. informally named for the site of the group's first meeting, the Hotel de Bilderberg in Oosterbeek, Netherlands.

Bilderberg attendees include people chosen to be the next leaders of the UK and US, such as Clinton, GWB, Thatcher, Blair and so on, as well as regular attendees such as Queen Beatrix of the Netherlands, David Rockefeller and Kissinger.

aside from choosing new world leaders they also meet to set interest rates and plan world events for the coming year...nothing happens by chance.

the "Group" is lead by a steering committee and i think Queen Beatrix (Prince Bernhard's daughter) is head of the steering committee, and there maybe a higher level which guides the steering committee but that's pure speculation and guess work.

OH yes! the most important thing i almost forgot...THEY ARE A BUNCH OF SICK DEGENERATE WEALTH HOARDING SCUM WHO TAKE GREAT PLEASURE IN PEOPLES SUFFERING UNDER UNFAIR TAXATION!


have i left anything out?


so erm...why do you ask, you must obviously have a reason, care to share?




PS, its "Group" not "club"

I like them. Old ambition of mine to one day attend a conference.

lol, good luck! but methinks you should get another "ambition"...unless you are a sick twisted paedophile-couldn't give a crap about the ordinary folk super rich person, or a politician going places...you ain't getting in

Ahh yes your fav topic KMA, but you forget that they cant control everything as life by its very nature in uncontrollable.

You've really got to try and stop seeing vipers in every nest, just because a few people want to hold onto a dream & idea that they have some measure of control doesnt make it true.

although i'm sure you'll say something much to the form of 'the best trick the devil ever did....'

Normal service will be resumed at that point

with the exception of your point about life being random...you lost me


i posted my thoughts because thats what Hitchkok asked for (i would have done the same regardless of who made the topic), but i also asked him why he was asking since in the OP he didn't state his reasons, and for him this thread is a bit "left-field" so to speak.

Wikipedia would have us believe that Prince Bernhard was not quite the initial founder, and that he fought for the allies, against the Germans...

in fact, according to Wikipedia, he's quite the decorated war hero... and quite popular for it...

Since I have found Wikipedia
to be more reliable and less slanderous than KMA,

KMA, would you care to give us your source?

hopefully something a little bit more credible than a conspiracy-theory website whose owner has too much time on their hands?



http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prince_Bernhard_of_Lippe

ROFL! a hero????

source...erm no! i done with sources...please research it yourself...




hero?!?!





edit:

contrary to my above that i wouldn't post a source, here's one that shows just how much of a "hero" he is: http://www.nrc.nl/international/article ... nesia_coup


i have NEVER asked anyone to believe a single thing i have ever said, all i ask is that you look for yourselves, Wiki is not a good place for such info!

Prince Bernhard was a Dutch Royal.. he is/was one of our most controversial princes, but generally loved by the people.
That does not say anything though. Recently letters have been declassified from him, talking about him becoming Viceroy of the East-Indies in exchange for a quick surrender of the Dutch.

Members of the Royal Family are generally frowned upon / forbidden to be a part of political organisations (NGO's are fine), and as such, upon joining the Royal Family, membership of the SS would be unacceptable. Note that until the moment the Allied infringements on German sovereignty lit the fuse on World War II, Hitler was not the "bad man" of Europe. That was that one guy in Spain, actually.


Anyway.. there's a lot more to the man as Wikipedia will admit. Besides, there's a rather extensive lobby which would rather keep the names of the Royal Family all white and spotless. It is not the Dutch way to accept that. We slay our heroes, but we love them nonetheless.



As for the Bilderberg Group, there's a lot of hype. This day and age, people are less and less accepting of exclusivity. If you'd tell someone they cannot go into the forest at night three centuries ago, almost everyone would accept that and not go into the forest. Now? You tell someone they can't go somewhere, and it becomes their top priority to go there. It's annoying.. but times change. I'd love to attend a conference once.. but I can accept it if I'm not ever going to. Let them have their conferences, there's no harm done in sharing information and aligning policies together. The world needs a single direction. Away from the black hole of time, lives and money that is the Middle-East.

more than anything about this topic, i'm still wondering why Hitchkok is asking what we know (or think...whatever) about Bilderberg

[KMA]Avenger wrote:more than anything about this topic, i'm still wondering why Hitchkok is asking what we know (or think...whatever) about Bilderberg

He's looking for a quick Godwin.

Godwin?

never heard the term before

[KMA]Avenger wrote:Godwin?

never heard the term before

Behold! http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Godwin%27s_law

[KMA]Avenger wrote:more than anything about this topic, i'm still wondering why Hitchkok is asking what we know (or think...whatever) about Bilderberg

Now, not whatever.
I specifically wrote know

Juliette wrote:

[KMA]Avenger wrote:more than anything about this topic, i'm still wondering why Hitchkok is asking what we know (or think...whatever) about Bilderberg

He's looking for a quick Godwin.

Yea, well, that's an interesting idea.
Slightly hampered by the fact that (allowing for the general tone of some members of this oh so fine section) i would probably be the subject of such comparison. But it's not our custom to let fact and rationality stand in our way, so let's not make an exception.

The truth is actually much more prosaic (and it is out there...).
Have a nice weekend.


EDIT: oh, and mathemathician in me wanted to add: actually, "As an online discussion grows longer, the probability of a comparison involving anything or anyone approaches 1".
well, under the assumptions of unlimited associations and uncensored mental indigestion it does, anyway.