Page 1 of 2
maybe multi. please check
Posted: Wed Jun 23, 2010 9:27 am
by ~Sokar~
Same title, same race, same commander.. I heard that the player of 48590 is the new owner of the 96579 account, but I don't know what happened with his 48590 account except it went down to 35mil army size from 100mil and yet no name or race name change happened. Not sure if they're multies or not, but it worth a try. Please check them.
id=48590
id=96579
Re: maybe multi. please check
Posted: Wed Jun 23, 2010 9:35 am
by Clarkey
Let me guess, you're at war with the first one if not the second too. 
So basically you have heard that one bought the other account, the old account dropped in army which was probably part of the sale and now because you have no idea who plays the 48590 account you want them checked for multies.
Fool... shall we check EVERY account ever traded for possible multi? ](./images/smilies/eusa_wall.gif "Brick wall")
Stop wasting admins precious time.
Re: maybe multi. please check
Posted: Wed Jun 23, 2010 9:42 am
by ~Sokar~
The fact that I'm at war with them has nothing to do with reporting this. Derentis (their race name) is an alliance in another game leaded by LN and I had proof about a multi in that alliance some time ago. That is why I created this thread, and not because I am at war with anyone.
Calling someone a fool is an insult which is not allowed on this forum, isn't it? Please do not think you know the reasons behind my actions as you do not. Thank you.
Re: maybe multi. please check
Posted: Wed Jun 23, 2010 9:45 am
by Clarkey
~Apollo~ wrote:The fact that I'm at war with them has nothing to do with reporting this. Derentis (their race name) is an alliance in another game leaded by LN and I had proof about a multi in that alliance. That is why I created this thread, and not because I am at war with anyone.
Calling someone a fool is an insult which is not allowed on this forum, isn't it? Please do not think you know the reasons behind my actions as you do not. Thank you.
If making accusations or assumptions as to the possibility of a multi you should provide all evidence.
What do you expect people to think here when you are in a war with them and suddenly report them to admins.
Do you know when the owner of 48590 took over 96579?
Have you given them enough time to do anything with their new accounts such as change name etc?
No calling someone a fool is not an insult, especially if you act like one.
Re: maybe multi. please check
Posted: Wed Jun 23, 2010 9:49 am
by EbilCC
Im a race that was an old alliance and ex members are still same race same way spelt but split over the game -__-
Re: maybe multi. please check
Posted: Wed Jun 23, 2010 10:07 am
by ~Sokar~
Clarkey wrote:~Apollo~ wrote:The fact that I'm at war with them has nothing to do with reporting this. Derentis (their race name) is an alliance in another game leaded by LN and I had proof about a multi in that alliance. That is why I created this thread, and not because I am at war with anyone.
Calling someone a fool is an insult which is not allowed on this forum, isn't it? Please do not think you know the reasons behind my actions as you do not. Thank you.
If making accusations or assumptions as to the possibility of a multi you should provide all evidence.
What do you expect people to think here when you are in a war with them and suddenly report them to admins.
Do you know when the owner of 48590 took over 96579?
Have you given them enough time to do anything with their new accounts such as change name etc?
No calling someone a fool is not an insult, especially if you act like one.
Interesting.. I also used this logic when I called someone an idiot, but I still got a warning. Badluck..
Anyway, maybe you just should not put your nose into everything what is not your business.. Let me check.. No, no you are not a mod nor an admin of this..
Re: maybe multi. please check
Posted: Wed Jun 23, 2010 10:17 am
by EbilCC
i was making a point that friends do sometimes have same race -__- I don't need to be a mod to point it out
Re: maybe multi. please check
Posted: Wed Jun 23, 2010 10:24 am
by ~Sokar~
True, but I quoted Clarkey and my reply was adressed to him not to you. Sorry if I was not clear enough.
Re: maybe multi. please check
Posted: Wed Jun 23, 2010 11:22 am
by Clarkey
~Apollo~ wrote:True, but I quoted Clarkey and my reply was adressed to him not to you. Sorry if I was not clear enough.
Trust me i know what i'm talking about which is more than you can say. i know now what happened to the accounts in question and there's nothing suspicious going on. Nerull now plays 96579 and he's waiting to sell his old one.
Re: maybe multi. please check
Posted: Wed Jun 23, 2010 12:24 pm
by ~Sokar~
His old one should be put onto VAC mode right after he got his new one.
Re: maybe multi. please check
Posted: Wed Jun 23, 2010 12:42 pm
by Clarkey
~Apollo~ wrote:His old one should be put onto VAC mode right after he got his new one.
This sort of comment just shows you are clutching at straws in an attempt to get your opponent in to trouble.
Did you consider that he may have used his old account to attack someone or PPT in the previous 24 hours to buying the other account?...... thought not.
Accounts don't have to go on vac mode immediately after a trade of accounts as there is a window of opportunity to transfer resources as part of the sale.
As long as Nerull doesn't log in to his old account then there is no rule breaking going on.
What straw are you going to clutch at now?
Re: maybe multi. please check
Posted: Wed Jun 23, 2010 11:31 pm
by ~Sokar~
To be honest you are the biggest annoyance I've ever met on forums. That sentence was clearly my opinion you like it or not.
I've already written down why I made this report.
You are not an admin of this nor a moderator, but you continously posting your idiotism in this thread. Somewhere we call this you wanna hijack this thread.. There are million possibilities how he could break the rules with the other account. Of course I don't know if he used it to attack someone or not, to spy someone or not,to sabotaged someone or not and don't know if he kept it or not. But I have reasons not to trust in his honor for the rules. Admin will check it. It is quite clear that you keep posting here because you don't like me, but luckily your sympathy is not needed if one wants to report a possible cheater.
Clarkey wrote:No calling someone a fool is not an insult, especially if you act like one.
In this case you are a biased, annoying, idiot.
EDIT:
Oh, I also forget the fact that both of his accounts are the officers of Desert Ghost. If the other account would just sit without attacking and spying it might be good if he just need time to hand over it to someone. But both accounts are the officer of the same person and I think this is an unfair advantage to the CO.
Re: maybe multi. please check
Posted: Thu Jun 24, 2010 6:48 am
by LordNerull
Clarky thanks for defending me
yes I did buy a new account on monday around 16:00 gametime , now this week has been very busy for me so thats why the lack of a name change, I was going too change my name last night till I was told that dexx ran off after massing my new def of only 10 bill too report me hmmm , I had been waiting for any attacks on you till I got my name changed
well now I have it changed (thanks too Gerbz) took longer as I had too use a 3rd party instead of doing it myself
admins if you still would like too look into this not a problem, just would perfer you guys going after real multis
thanks again Clarky
Re: maybe multi. please check
Posted: Thu Jun 24, 2010 9:38 am
by Clarkey
~Apollo~ wrote:To be honest you are the biggest annoyance I've ever met on forums.
Am I bothered?~Apollo~ wrote:You are not an admin of this nor a moderator, but you continously posting your idiotism in this thread.
~Apollo~ wrote:But I have reasons not to trust in his honor for the rules. Admin will check it. It is quite clear that you keep posting here because you don't like me, but luckily your sympathy is not needed if one wants to report a possible cheater.
Because I don't like you? Erm I'd have to have "heard" of you to not like you..... and I don't care enough to bother "hearing" of you.This is the true reason you reported Nerull, as a "prey and hope" attempt.Anyway I reported it as a "maybe multi". I hope Nerull was that stupid to keep his previous account and now he got banned himself. If not, it worthed a try.
^^ That is a quote from you from your forums. Clearly showing that you have no real suspicion and that you have reported him only in the hope that he may be cheating.
Re: maybe multi. please check
Posted: Thu Jun 24, 2010 10:17 am
by ~Sokar~
ROFL What a damn logic you have!
1.) I reported it as a "maybe multi", because I felt (it is called suspicion) there's a possibility that it is.
2.) And yeah I really hoped it is a multi. Is it a bad thing? He is my enemy and I hate him as much as one can hate another via the internet so, I would really be happy if he got himself banned.
Well seeing that you've posted more times in my war thread I think you heard about me.
Anyway.. nice quote.. from our forums.. yay
another nine in the "many..."
Torchwood IDs locked.