StarGateWars Forums

I suppose its already been put forward somewhere but should a section for in-house discussions be made?

house? in-house?

ah, no wonder we couldnt figure it out... we've not read about those updates yet...

Then make the House leaders the Group leaders of the sections....Making it private.

We don't give every alliance or group of alliances their own section of the forums, so why should such a privilege be extended to the leaders of these so-called houses?

I say we alter the description of the 'Alliance Announcements' to include something about discussion/advertisement of Houses, but leave them that. Let the House leaders make their own forums, like everybody else has been doing for years, if they're so keen to chat.

Joel McHale wrote:

Mordack wrote:We don't give every alliance or group of alliances their own section of the forums, so why should such a privilege be extended to the leaders of these so-called houses?

I say we alter the description of the 'Alliance Announcements' to include something about discussion/advertisement of Houses, but leave them that. Let the House leaders make their own forums, like everybody else has been doing for years, if they're so keen to chat.

I imagine the argument will go along these lines:

Houses are a game function, just like alliances

alliances have a section

houses should have a section


I personally do not see the need

I'm not against giving Houses their own section which works along the same lines as the announcement/recruitment forums which exist for the benefit of alliances, but someone earlier suggested that these sections be private and led by House leaders. That's what I'm against.

Joel McHale wrote:

Mordack wrote:

Joel McHale wrote:

Mordack wrote:We don't give every alliance or group of alliances their own section of the forums, so why should such a privilege be extended to the leaders of these so-called houses?

I say we alter the description of the 'Alliance Announcements' to include something about discussion/advertisement of Houses, but leave them that. Let the House leaders make their own forums, like everybody else has been doing for years, if they're so keen to chat.

I imagine the argument will go along these lines:

Houses are a game function, just like alliances

alliances have a section

houses should have a section


I personally do not see the need

I'm not against giving Houses their own section which works along the same lines as the announcement/recruitment forums which exist for the benefit of alliances, but someone earlier suggested that these sections be private and led by House leaders. That's what I'm against.

ah, fair enough

yeah I'd be dead set against that too

agreed.