Page 1 of 1
RoKet
Posted: Sun Jul 25, 2010 11:16 am
by ƒëmmë ƒatalë
RoKet Says
RoKeT says (3:14 AM):
*RoKeT here, I have been banned for 6th warning, but to my knowledge was my 6th warning last time I was banned, and have not recieved once since;
I'm assuming one was dropped after 6 months adn my counter went up to 6 again, so it was a mistake, can I please be informed if this is true or not, also, Could I please also be informed as to what my other if so 3 warnings were for today?
Re: RoKet
Posted: Sun Jul 25, 2010 11:17 am
by Empy
Good thing this went straight here instead of just asking any Moderator to look at his User Notes.
Re: RoKet
Posted: Sun Jul 25, 2010 11:21 am
by ƒëmmë ƒatalë
RoKeT Says
RoKeT says (3:17 AM):
*lol I tried to post in the mod thread they deleted it rofl
Re: RoKet
Posted: Sun Jul 25, 2010 11:32 am
by ƒëmmë ƒatalë
Roket asked me to post on his behalf in the ombusmans section.
RoKeT says (3:29 AM):
*omg, would you post this for me
*If I was trying to Evade a bann Eary why would I put bann this account as the title? why would you move it, and can you answer the question as to why I'm banned? I don't see you answering it and you already have it... so answer it?
Re: RoKet
Posted: Sun Jul 25, 2010 12:04 pm
by Juliette
What a fuss about such a short ban.

It's for your own protection. You were about to receive more warnings.. we've saved you from that. What more would you want us to do? Bow to the ground and kiss your feet?
Wasting daylight, RoKeT. Grab a bite to eat and before you know it, that 'ban' (*cough*) is over. (It is by the time I post this.)
Re: RoKet
Posted: Sun Jul 25, 2010 12:06 pm
by Clarkey
Juliette wrote:What a fuss about such a short ban.
Why don't you read properly?
The length of ban was a mistake, and therefore was not corrected before this thread was made. Therefore the ban was not such a short ban at time of creating this thread.
Re: RoKet
Posted: Sun Jul 25, 2010 12:17 pm
by Clarkey
Earendil wrote:Clarkey wrote:Juliette wrote:What a fuss about such a short ban.
Why don't you read properly?
The length of ban was a mistake, and therefore was not corrected before this thread was made. Therefore the ban was not such a short ban at time of creating this thread.
Actually.
This thread had nothing to do with the length being shortened.
Stop thinking you're helping, in reality, you're just making things worse right now.
Where did i say the thread had anything to do with the ban being shortened?
I believe the thread was created before the ban length was corrected. I did not say the thread had any affect.

Re: RoKet
Posted: Sun Jul 25, 2010 12:18 pm
by Juliette
Regardless, this thread is now pointless -as the ban ended. Closed.