Page 1 of 3

DISGUSTING BEHAVIOUR BY INSURANCE FIRMS!

Posted: Sat Jul 31, 2010 9:15 am
by [KMA]Avenger
is there no end to the corruption, and lengths some will go to-to make a "buck"?!

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2010-07-2 ... gency.html


if Obama wasn't a compromised President, and if he didnt work for the banksters, and if he gave a **Filtered** about his "supposed" countryman he would send in the army on these scum-bags and wipe them out as a lesson to the rest...if he was a president that is!

Re: DISGUSTING BEHAVIOUR BY INSURANCE FIRMS!

Posted: Sun Aug 01, 2010 6:31 am
by MEZZANINE
Insurance companies screw us when we are alive, so it's no surprise that they do the same to those who have died.

I'd have to list Insurance Claims Handlers as one of the top 5 most hated professions,

1) Politicians
2) Bankers
3) Insurance Claims Handlers ( Those who use small print to avoid paying out or pay out a little as possible )
4) Solicitors ( Lawyers for the yanks, but in the UK Lawyer is generic term that can mean paralegal, legal exec, conveyancer, sometimes even legal secreataries, it does not mean a qualified solicitor so beware of anyone in the UK who calls themselves a Lawyer it probably means not qualified )
5) PR people ( professional BSers )

Re: DISGUSTING BEHAVIOUR BY INSURANCE FIRMS!

Posted: Sun Aug 01, 2010 11:31 pm
by [KMA]Avenger
MEZZANINE wrote:Insurance companies screw us when we are alive, so it's no surprise that they do the same to those who have died.


true, but when you consider they are robbing the families of dead and maimed servicemen, their crimes are magnified beyond any number i can come up with.



MEZZANINE wrote:I'd have to list Insurance Claims Handlers as one of the top 5 most hated professions,

1) Politicians
2) Bankers
3) Insurance Claims Handlers ( Those who use small print to avoid paying out or pay out a little as possible )
4) Solicitors ( Lawyers for the yanks, but in the UK Lawyer is generic term that can mean paralegal, legal exec, conveyancer, sometimes even legal secreataries, it does not mean a qualified solicitor so beware of anyone in the UK who calls themselves a Lawyer it probably means not qualified )
5) PR people ( professional BSers )


i would amend and add to the above:

1) Banksters
2) Politicians
3) Lobbyists
4) Corporate Execs
5) Insurance Claims Handlers (Those who use small print to avoid paying out or pay out as little as possible)
6) Solicitors
7) Police Officers
8 ) Last but by no means least-so called "TV Experts".

all of the above are hated with equal PASSION!

Re: DISGUSTING BEHAVIOUR BY INSURANCE FIRMS!

Posted: Sat Aug 14, 2010 11:45 pm
by Mister Sandman
How can you not like police officers,

its people like you that good people dont want to work as one.

Re: DISGUSTING BEHAVIOUR BY INSURANCE FIRMS!

Posted: Sat Aug 14, 2010 11:46 pm
by [KMA]Avenger
you missed the underlined word and assumed i meant policemen.

Re: DISGUSTING BEHAVIOUR BY INSURANCE FIRMS!

Posted: Sat Aug 14, 2010 11:53 pm
by Mister Sandman
No difference...

Officers is a more generic term...

Welcome to Equal Opportunity Employment..


There is no different between police men and police women,

despite the fact, the gender roles may play a better part in different situations.

Re: DISGUSTING BEHAVIOUR BY INSURANCE FIRMS!

Posted: Sat Aug 14, 2010 11:57 pm
by [KMA]Avenger
i am not talking about gender. and if i was you i would find out the difference between an police officer and a policeman...

just to put you on the right track...1 has an office, the other does not.

Re: DISGUSTING BEHAVIOUR BY INSURANCE FIRMS!

Posted: Sat Aug 14, 2010 11:59 pm
by Mister Sandman
Seriously you really need a dictionary for your birthday.


police officer

–noun
1.
any policeman or policewoman; patrolman or patrolwoman.
2.
a person having officer rank on a police force.


http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/police+officer



po·lice·man
   
/pəˈlismən/ Show Spelled[puh-lees-muhn] Show IPA
–noun, plural -men.
1.
a member of a police force or body.

http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/policeman

Re: DISGUSTING BEHAVIOUR BY INSURANCE FIRMS!

Posted: Sun Aug 15, 2010 12:01 am
by [KMA]Avenger
what you looking in a dictionary for? your not going to find the answer there!

you need to read the Govt documents which outlines that an officer is there to generate revenue and nothing more, while the other is what you know as a peace keeper.

Re: DISGUSTING BEHAVIOUR BY INSURANCE FIRMS!

Posted: Sun Aug 15, 2010 12:06 am
by Mister Sandman
You cannot distinguish one from the other. Learn 2 Read.
They both, do the same job.

They both, 'generate' the gov income,
however, that is though fines ect which people have done unlawful/illegal acts....

And the fines help fund their wages.

Or would you rather pay more tax and send petty criminals into jail?

Sounds like a plan!

Re: DISGUSTING BEHAVIOUR BY INSURANCE FIRMS!

Posted: Sun Aug 15, 2010 12:12 am
by [KMA]Avenger
:roll: #-o ](*,)

Re: DISGUSTING BEHAVIOUR BY INSURANCE FIRMS!

Posted: Sun Aug 15, 2010 12:16 am
by Mister Sandman
[KMA]Avenger wrote::roll: #-o ](*,)



You should that, and maybe we will piece that thick skull and maybe find some brain....

I said maybe....

Re: DISGUSTING BEHAVIOUR BY INSURANCE FIRMS!

Posted: Sun Aug 15, 2010 12:19 am
by [KMA]Avenger
Touché, but smart-arse replies don't make truths 8)

Re: DISGUSTING BEHAVIOUR BY INSURANCE FIRMS!

Posted: Sun Aug 15, 2010 12:24 am
by Mister Sandman
I gave you definitions, as per stated in a dictionary, you gave nothing just some psycho-babble about government documents which you have no evidence, precedents or and refutable facts about.

In other words,

trying to act smart doesnt get you truths,

claims dont give truths.

Re: DISGUSTING BEHAVIOUR BY INSURANCE FIRMS!

Posted: Sun Aug 15, 2010 12:31 am
by [KMA]Avenger
just go read the Govt documents from all over the world...or not,makes no difference to me if you do your own leg work or not.