Page 1 of 2
closed
Posted: Fri Aug 27, 2010 3:47 am
by Deerslayer
SquirrelWrangler [ The Rising ]
Ascended Level: 3: Young DemiGod
Realm Unique Identification Number (aka RUIN or ID): 29166
There is no way this noob learns to get sabbed out, sab and build like he does umless he has been playing here in Q for a while. I'm sorry but this server is little different then main. this is a new account yet plays like a vet. I just don't understand why he would resort to this. WHAT A LOSSER.
My point is simple, no noob learns to be a seasoned player in 1 week. Admin, you know this to be true.
Re: Multi
Posted: Fri Aug 27, 2010 3:59 am
by sarparto
So your entire argument is; "He kicked your ass, ergo multi."
Good luck with that buddy.
Re: Multi
Posted: Fri Aug 27, 2010 4:42 am
by Deerslayer
that's funny, it would take more then that. why am I defending myself from you, you don't play Q, stick to your main account and stay out of Q forum... or is this a bit to complicated for ya.
Re: Multi
Posted: Fri Aug 27, 2010 5:12 am
by sarparto
You really don't know why you're defending yourself? Let me help you out:
Deerslayer wrote:SquirrelWrangler [ The Rising ]
Ascended Level: 3: Young DemiGod
Realm Unique Identification Number (aka RUIN or ID): 29166
There is no way this noob learns to get sabbed out, sab and build like he does umless he has been playing here in Q for a while.
(A "noob" picked up how to play Q faster than you.)
I'm sorry but this server is little different then main. this is a new account yet plays like a vet.
(Aforementioned "noob" beat you in a battle.)
I just don't understand why he would resort to this. WHAT A LOSSER.
(Petty name calling.)
My point is simple, no noob learns to be a seasoned player in 1 week. Admin, you know this to be true.
(He beat you in a battle, therefore he's a multi)
I hope this helps as I play Q and wouldn't want to be accused of being a multi if I were to mass you.
If it turns out that SquirrelWrangler is a multi I'll apologise for doubting you, but so far you've submitted 0 evidence to prove their guilt other than the fact that they beat you in a battle.
Re: Multi
Posted: Fri Aug 27, 2010 7:00 am
by Deerslayer
I have been around for a while, been playing Q for a while...you on the other hand...haven't. All I'm saying is that his tactics are not the tactics of someone that started to play this game a week ago...or 2 weeks, however long it has been since the wave started. He has already stated that he doesn't play main. So if you could say that you played aggressive and used season tactics either here or in main when you first started, then your right you must be better then me...
http://quantumgate.gatewars.com/legends ... p?id=26122but this says different.
This should be moved to suggestions Knight.
Re: Multi
Posted: Fri Aug 27, 2010 7:04 am
by sarparto
Fair enough.
Re: Multi
Posted: Fri Aug 27, 2010 8:00 am
by Mathlord
Hey deerslayer, maybe he has some friends who can lend him some advice.
Maybe *shock* he's actually a really good player who can figure out this game in a few days.
Sheesh, it's not like we're comparing tech strategies in Civ 4, this is stargatewars for crying out loud.
Re: Multi
Posted: Fri Aug 27, 2010 8:31 am
by renegadze
so is your entire argument based around the fact he is level 3 ascended?
lmao sorry but it doesn't take much to work out how to do that
Re: Multi
Posted: Fri Aug 27, 2010 9:56 am
by Mathlord
Don't worry Rene, we all know everyone in The Rising is my multi...that's why we have the same ip address...oh wait no we don't.
You know deerslayer, you finished 22nd in your first quantum wave. I think clearly you must be a multi too. I mean shoot that is way too good for someone with talent to reach on a first try...plus you seem to have a pretty clear cut idea of what a multi is from your accusations.
I vote this thread now becomes the "deerslayer is a multi" thread ^_^
Now do you realize how silly you sound?
Re: Multi
Posted: Fri Aug 27, 2010 10:27 am
by Neimenljivi
Not that I'm arsed to explain it, but you guys don't know the whole whole story 
~Jack
Re: Multi
Posted: Fri Aug 27, 2010 10:35 am
by renegadze
Neimenljivi wrote:Not that I'm arsed to explain it, but you guys don't know the whole whole story
~Jack
Then maybe in his accusation thread, the OP should have explained "the whole story"
otherwise it's a pointless thread
Re: Multi
Posted: Fri Aug 27, 2010 11:07 am
by Neimenljivi
renegadze wrote:Neimenljivi wrote:Not that I'm arsed to explain it, but you guys don't know the whole whole story
~Jack
Then maybe in his accusation thread, the OP should have explained "the whole story"
otherwise it's a pointless thread
It is better that the 100% of the story isn't known to public, there'd be too many bad blood after that, especially in case it gets proven right
~Jack
Re: Multi
Posted: Fri Aug 27, 2010 1:57 pm
by Mathlord
I think we're way past the point of bad blood Jack
Re: Multi
Posted: Fri Aug 27, 2010 3:49 pm
by BMMJ13
I don't really see the point of publicly accusing someone of being a Multi when you refuse to show the evidence publicly. I still don't see anything in this topic other than that he is a new player yet plays aggressive and strategically? What's the point of making the topic if your only evidence is that.
Re: Multi
Posted: Fri Aug 27, 2010 4:07 pm
by Neimenljivi
Mathlord wrote:I think we're way past the point of bad blood Jack
If your members keep showing hostile aggressions towards us (sabbing etc) then I fully agree with you
~Jack