Page 1 of 1

Siganture

Posted: Sun Aug 29, 2010 2:11 am
by GOLDEN WING
ive had the same sigs for almost 3 months now.

i got this pm yesterday which i only read now.



You're signature is in violation of Board rule 3.F (found @ viewtopic.php?f=71&t=101808 ) You have 24 hours from the time of this pm being sent, or 30 minutes of this pm having been read to change it or you will receive a replacement signature for a period of time. If you have any questions please feel free to ask.

~Eärendil


i don't understand how im breaking any rules and their is no reasoning to why i must remove any of them and the rule which he says im breaking was not said in the pm.

so please someone explain to me wth is going on?


If another mod/admin messages me about my sigs they politely tell me what they want me to do eg put a sig or 2 in a spoiler or something. and Eary just said what forum rule im breaking (signature) but i have no clue what he wants me to do to my Signature.

Re: Siganture

Posted: Sun Aug 29, 2010 2:16 am
by Clarkey
Firstly sig height max is 450px according to the rule. Yours is 500px.

Secondly this shows Earendil's bias towards femme after giving GW notice via PM with the 24hr time frame and 30 minutes from point of PM being read, and his inconsistency to mod fairly.

Re: Siganture

Posted: Sun Aug 29, 2010 2:17 am
by ƒëmmë ƒatalë
your siggy must have been too big :(

lucky you though, Eary did you the curtesy of sending you a notice about it.. see my nice red one.. no notice at all

Re: Siganture

Posted: Sun Aug 29, 2010 2:18 am
by GOLDEN WING
but the allowance when changing ur sig is 500:200 or something,

Re: Siganture

Posted: Sun Aug 29, 2010 2:20 am
by Clarkey
GOLDEN WING wrote:but the allowance when changing ur sig is 500:200 or something,
The 500 would be an individual image size. You could have 10 images on top of each other that were 100x100px and it would allow it. You have to check that your sig from top to bottom is no bigger than 450px. This includes images, quotes, and closed spoilers etc.

Re: Siganture

Posted: Sun Aug 29, 2010 2:27 am
by GOLDEN WING
awsum thanks why couldn't he have just said that in the pm then. :roll:

Re: Siganture

Posted: Sun Aug 29, 2010 2:35 am
by Zeratul
Because it has been in the rules for months, and users are expected to have learned the rules?

Re: Siganture

Posted: Sun Aug 29, 2010 9:10 am
by Empy
GOLDEN WING wrote:awsum thanks why couldn't he have just said that in the pm then. :roll:
He could have said that, or you could have read the rule where it says that which he linked.

Regardless the situation has been resolved. Topic locked.

~Empy