Harch Unbanning Please

[ƒëmmë ƒatalë]

Harch would like to be unbanned from forum, the reasons behind his self banning have been resolved.

Scott says (2:17 AM):
*can u post in admin/ ombudsman
*i would like to be unbanned
*:)
*since i self banned for personal reasons
*i want to be unbanned now that they are solved

[Zeratul]

Harchester is banned for 3 months at his request. I've let him know that he will NOT be unbanned before then.

His ban lasts till the 24th of November.

[Clarkey]

Funny how one person gets banned when asked but Happy Hippy Man was refused his request.

[knight]

Funny how one person gets banned when asked but Happy Hippy Man was refused his request.

Constant bring this up is not funny.

[Empy]

Ya, stick it to the man! Wait... no..

Circumstances were different.

[Jack]

Funny how one person gets banned when asked but Happy Hippy Man was refused his request.

Oh boo hoo, someone was denied their request to get bant.

[shooty08]

Unless I'm wrong, banning is supposed to be a punishment, not a right.

[Clarkey]

Ya, stick it to the man! Wait... no..

Circumstances were different.

No they weren't. HHM asked for his account to be deleted, he was told no. Then he requested it be banned, and he was told the only way to get it banned is for it to break rules and get banned. That's treating 2 people completely different from each other for the same request.

[BenjaminMS]

Ya, stick it to the man! Wait... no..

Circumstances were different.

No they weren't. HHM asked for his account to be deleted, he was told no. Then he requested it be banned, and he was told the only way to get it banned is for it to break rules and get banned. That's treating 2 people completely different from each other for the same request.

As far as I know, that's not true. His deletion request got denied, yes. Then at first indeed his banning request got denied too, but before there could have been given a better look at, he already had posted enough rule-breaking posts to get an instant permaban.
As for Harch.... that is too bad :/

[Mordack]

The administration are stupid for allowing a silly precedent like this to start, so they can deal with the fallout. Banning shouldn't be something you can order like a takeaway and then send back immediatly afterwards. If the admin allowed you to be banned at your own request, and you've had a change of heart, then don't even bother cluttering up my section with a thread.

[Lithium]

mordac is right perhaps it needs a new form like Lock me at request. some ppl are addicted and better a temp lock then they delete their acc.

anyway dont unban him till nov