Minimum Damage Bug?
Posted: Fri Jan 28, 2011 4:55 am
I thought the defensive action required to do damage was bigger than 1% of my strike,
and I'm surprised that I'm losing troops to these tiny defenses, and that they are bothering to fight...
01:20 CW Naquadah stolen 15 2 2 643,276,015,200 31,585,105 details
^^^ it says it killed 2 soldiers, but I only lost a single merc, I guess the other one was badly injured?
I was smart enough to only send armed soldiers on this one...
I was fearing auto-ban after that for the next 30 minutes after I saw that one...
Jan 24, 00:49 Vr Naquadah stolen 15 0 0 978,747,202,660 118,570 details
^^^ This attack by myself, against a tiny defense, with zero dead troops to me, has been the exception lately, rather than the rule... though again, I'm surprised they fought...
Jan 23, 20:01 ly Naquadah stolen 15 106 142 699,862,257,600 2,116,603,210 details
Jan 23, 08:49 De Naquadah stolen 15 717 1,769 622,077,651,000 823,530,476 details
^^^ I kinda forgot that I sent 25 mil unarmed normal attackers along for the ride...
so that's my bad...
but again, I'm surprised the other guy's troops bothered to fight...
Jan 22, 23:48 Trockstar 25,827,979,266 Naquadah stolen 15 2,500 979 658,988,076,883 482,771,520 details
I just remembered that some of them had less than 500 AC units tagging along... but I only lost 14 AC units to this guy... which leaves a lot of dead soldiers, though again unarmed...
I don't mind that my targets are doing a tiny little bit of damage,
it's the least the game could do for them...
but I didn't know it was changed, and that puzzles me greatly...![[017.gif] :smt017](./images/smilies/017.gif)
and is the percentage supposed to include my mothership action added as ground support?
and I'm surprised that I'm losing troops to these tiny defenses, and that they are bothering to fight...
01:20 CW Naquadah stolen 15 2 2 643,276,015,200 31,585,105 details
^^^ it says it killed 2 soldiers, but I only lost a single merc, I guess the other one was badly injured?
I was smart enough to only send armed soldiers on this one...
I was fearing auto-ban after that for the next 30 minutes after I saw that one...
Jan 24, 00:49 Vr Naquadah stolen 15 0 0 978,747,202,660 118,570 details
^^^ This attack by myself, against a tiny defense, with zero dead troops to me, has been the exception lately, rather than the rule... though again, I'm surprised they fought...
Jan 23, 20:01 ly Naquadah stolen 15 106 142 699,862,257,600 2,116,603,210 details
Jan 23, 08:49 De Naquadah stolen 15 717 1,769 622,077,651,000 823,530,476 details
^^^ I kinda forgot that I sent 25 mil unarmed normal attackers along for the ride...
so that's my bad...
but again, I'm surprised the other guy's troops bothered to fight...
Jan 22, 23:48 Trockstar 25,827,979,266 Naquadah stolen 15 2,500 979 658,988,076,883 482,771,520 details
I just remembered that some of them had less than 500 AC units tagging along... but I only lost 14 AC units to this guy... which leaves a lot of dead soldiers, though again unarmed...
I don't mind that my targets are doing a tiny little bit of damage,
it's the least the game could do for them...
but I didn't know it was changed, and that puzzles me greatly...
![[017.gif] :smt017](./images/smilies/017.gif)
and is the percentage supposed to include my mothership action added as ground support?