StarGateWars Forums

OK I made this suggstion a while back but didn't post because of the whole fericide "issue" and thought people would just see it as a TL way of making the def easier to mass. I know Rodwolf now has the account, and so as to stop any conspiracy my suggestion would be to implement this if/when he ever lost his def

Suggestions
1) Rank 1-10? cannot use nox or critical while they hold this rank, to be considered the most powerful beings it's not right you can hide behind the nox

2) Being on nox/critical should have a detremental affect to your own strike, again if seeking the help of the nox to hide, then you shouldn't be able to wield your entire attacking power.

the 1-10 rank was just an idea...but maybe all of first page?

Sounds reasonable to me.

Hmm not a bad idea, and sounds a bit logical too.


Also expand it to decrease the use of PPT on those ranks perhaps ?
Not all, but more limited.

How often do we not see people in those ranks mostly riding it on PPT
Decrease by half or something, or make it far more expensive to use at that level.

i like both ideas.. i can't see the 1st idea working but it's a good idea and second one yes you shouldn't be able to hide behind nox/crit without paying some kind of price.

renegadze wrote:2) Being on nox/critical should have a detremental affect to your own strike, again if seeking the help of the nox to hide, then you shouldn't be able to wield your entire attacking power.

I like this one, for the stated reasons and also because it makes perfect sense in the RPG / SG context
(since the nox removed the weapons of SG1 after they healed them iirc)

Reschef wrote:

renegadze wrote:2) Being on nox/critical should have a detremental affect to your own strike, again if seeking the help of the nox to hide, then you shouldn't be able to wield your entire attacking power.

I like this one, for the stated reasons and also because it makes perfect sense in the RPG / SG context
(since the nox removed the weapons of SG1 after they healed them iirc)

Was just about to say that, the Roleplay of the nox even letting you attack while having nox on is crazy they were ridiculously against violence so why are you able to even attack if you have nox on?

renegadze wrote:OK I made this suggstion a while back but didn't post because of the whole fericide "issue" and thought people would just see it as a TL way of making the def easier to mass. I know Rodwolf now has the account, and so as to stop any conspiracy my suggestion would be to implement this if/when he ever lost his def

Suggestions
1) Rank 1-10? cannot use nox or critical while they hold this rank, to be considered the most powerful beings it's not right you can hide behind the nox

2) Being on nox/critical should have a detremental affect to your own strike, again if seeking the help of the nox to hide, then you shouldn't be able to wield your entire attacking power.

the 1-10 rank was just an idea...but maybe all of first page?

I like the idea, but I wouldnt use the term "hide" . I would like to see it as an option a few times per day for a specific amount of time rather than automatic. OR remove 1 of the 2 phases. 1 is enough actually. It does not make much sense to me for an account to be covert phased and not nox phased. I would rather see removed the covert phase part and keep the Nox. In addition increase the % of attack required t0 hit a defense.

TBH I dont think rank should come into it, what if your rank 15 and 5 people above you deliberately drop rank to make you vulnerable ?

But it would make sense if

1) Nox not only protected but also forced disarmament at a small % of weapons per turn.

2) Nox refused to protect you if you have a very high % of armysize trained as supers ( def or att ), nox could then see you as too militaristic to warrant protection.

it's just working out the right % for the nox to have no effect how many supers ect..

~Da Vinci~ wrote:it's just working out the right % for the nox to have no effect how many supers ect..

The devil in the detail, there are many good suggestions that people agree on in principal but will never agree the % & calcs for.

MEZZANINE wrote:TBH I dont think rank should come into it, what if your rank 15 and 5 people above you deliberately drop rank to make you vulnerable ?

But it would make sense if

1) Nox not only protected but also forced disarmament at a small % of weapons per turn.

2) Nox refused to protect you if you have a very high % of armysize trained as supers ( def or att ), nox could then see you as too militaristic to warrant protection.

Forced disarmament is viable, it would give players the option to be below the threshold at log off. I would make it so you disarm yourself rather than losing weapons.

Jedi~Tank wrote:

MEZZANINE wrote:TBH I dont think rank should come into it, what if your rank 15 and 5 people above you deliberately drop rank to make you vulnerable ?

But it would make sense if

1) Nox not only protected but also forced disarmament at a small % of weapons per turn.

2) Nox refused to protect you if you have a very high % of armysize trained as supers ( def or att ), nox could then see you as too militaristic to warrant protection.

Forced disarmament is viable, it would give players the option to be below the threshold at log off. I would make it so you disarm yourself rather than losing weapons.

Sounds like a good plan. Who knows.. admin might like it.

Power is not based on rank.

If you want to go with something like this then look at level of ascension... IE all Unknowns cannot use nox or something.

if rank might do that trick the account total power cant do it.

NOX can be greyed out if the account reach a certain power which shows the account is too big to hide so far resulting in nox off. and the power check script to run once per day so selling some covert to expose a player wont work.

well not sure we can now punish uknowns when they didn't know this "feature"