Page 1 of 2

kynell v marshall

Posted: Sun Jul 03, 2011 11:41 am
by kynell
we are nap and friendly alliances i farmed you on ascended just like you guys farm me on ascended no1 complains about it you had 0 def just like most people and myself so no1 gets hurt then you decided to mass my supers and send me this message.....

Message text:

fine... if you hit me again I\'ll wipe you out main and ascended


Marshall
DxM 2IC

so as we are friendly alliance despite your threat im asking you to vendetta me your rules and you decide the start date accept and live up to your threats or apologise.

regards
kynell

Re: kynell v marshall

Posted: Sun Jul 03, 2011 11:45 am
by Rudy Peña
you must talk to your HC about the vendentta and then your hc talks to his HC and his HC talks to him, then he can accept or not........man you must know your NAP rules.

Re: kynell v marshall

Posted: Sun Jul 03, 2011 11:47 am
by Clarkey
Rudy Pena wrote:you must talk to your HC about the vendentta and then your hc talks to his HC and his HC talks to him, then he can accept or not........man you must know your NAP rules.

Sounds long winded to me just for a fight.

Have fun whatever you end up doing.

Re: kynell v marshall

Posted: Sun Jul 03, 2011 11:48 am
by Rudy Peña
Rules are rules.. ;)

Re: kynell v marshall

Posted: Sun Jul 03, 2011 11:53 am
by BenjaminMS
Rudy, IMHO Kynell is not to blame here. By sending that threath Marshall overstepped his bounds. Yes, your NAP (I don't know the exact contents, so I'd need to guess here) seems to prevent any unagreed vendetta's, and that's Kynell's only error perhaps - but such a threath without checking whether the one you sent such a threath to isn't NAP'd? That's silly if Marshall hasn't done that, and it's even worse if Marshall had checked that.

Anyway, have fun both.
-Ben

Re: kynell v marshall

Posted: Sun Jul 03, 2011 12:01 pm
by kynell
i agree about the rules and i respect the nap which is why i didnt mass him i asked to vendetta first and i have giving him the option to start date so the hc can sort it all out.

we are still friends and naps it just a fun vendetta to clear the air upto him if he chooses to accept or not :smt060

Re: kynell v marshall

Posted: Sun Jul 03, 2011 12:10 pm
by marshall
Defensive Action 0


build something and we'll talk

Re: kynell v marshall

Posted: Sun Jul 03, 2011 12:16 pm
by kynell
marshall wrote:Defensive Action 0


build something and we'll talk


thats coz im at war dude i get massed all the time and i notce your at war to which is why the low def etc but we can work somthing out and either ask our enemies for a 1 week break or just fight eachother while we at war or just wait till after our wars

Re: kynell v marshall

Posted: Sun Jul 03, 2011 12:22 pm
by marshall
DxM are at war too ;) if I log on to 0 a temp defence is built

Re: kynell v marshall

Posted: Sun Jul 03, 2011 12:25 pm
by kynell
marshall wrote:DxM are at war too ;) if I log on to 0 a temp defence is built


yes but thats prob coz your ememies build a temp def to my enemies mainly keep 0 def so i aint building anything for them either its only fair :)

Re: kynell v marshall

Posted: Sun Jul 03, 2011 12:31 pm
by minisaiyan
kynell wrote:yes but thats prob coz your ememies build a temp def to my enemies mainly keep 0 def so i aint building anything for them either its only fair :)


i just spied 5 OE members ranked 2k or worse, off ppt. 1 of them didnt have a defence, would you like me to continue spying, or are you content with me saying that this post was not very well thought out?

I'm not a marshall fan from our previous encounters, but if this happens, go marshall XD

Re: kynell v marshall

Posted: Sun Jul 03, 2011 12:35 pm
by marshall
CJL wrote:I'm not a marshall fan from our previous encounters, but if this happens, go marshall XD


yea i'm a douche :D but thanks ^_^

this wont happen though, kynell thinks I DM'd him or something on ascended when I didnt, dont have the turns to spare with the amount of TC i've been descending lol

Re: kynell v marshall

Posted: Sun Jul 03, 2011 12:47 pm
by Jorgensen
Kynell never has anything to wipe out.. marshal would smash you anyways..

Re: kynell v marshall

Posted: Sun Jul 03, 2011 12:50 pm
by kynell
CJL wrote:
kynell wrote:yes but thats prob coz your ememies build a temp def to my enemies mainly keep 0 def so i aint building anything for them either its only fair :)


i just spied 5 OE members ranked 2k or worse, off ppt. 1 of them didnt have a defence, would you like me to continue spying, or are you content with me saying that this post was not very well thought out?

I'm not a marshall fan from our previous encounters, but if this happens, go marshall XD


ok have u noticed the size of oe empire compared to us? and my logs are filled with 0 def guys sniping me so dont come here saying crap when u dont know about it.

also my post doesnt have to be thought out neither do i have to post foul mouth nonsense in this thread about the reasons etc our alliances are friends and will continue to be friends after this is sorted out and while we are vendetta etc so please dont come in here stiring up trouble either say good luck or summit nice or dont post at all [-X

Re: kynell v marshall

Posted: Sun Jul 03, 2011 1:20 pm
by marshall
Agreed kynell, thank you for the support jorgensen but no stirring here please. DDE and RW are friends and will be. This just needs a bit of time to settle down.


Dan