[KMA]Avenger wrote:@Mezz, i don't care if Cameron is right or wrong, he knows what the people want and should give the people what they want. once we we leave we are then free to get our house in order. will it be painful in the short term, of course it will be. but in the long term...THIS IS SPA...i mean...THIS IS ENGLAND!!!
As for these credit rating agency's, they need to be dealt with for insider trading, they are as guilty as the banks, they can be dealt with if a PM had the gumption and will to do it.
Edit:
If we don't get out soon it will be to late. the EU is a dinosaur and is going to drag everybody down:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldne ... ssels.html
You know I am anti-EU, I want a referendum ASAP
BUT
The current coalition cannot do it, Cons are mostly anti-EU or EU Reformers, LibDems opposite position heavily pro-EU. LibDem voters complain that they didnt get much in this coalition but they did, they got a NO vote on a referendum they dont want because they cant win.
If Cons did give us a referendum now ( it would take at least a year to do it anyway ), YES we would get out of the EU, but we would be left with an ineffective minority government, hell Labour & LibDems could still join forces in a new coalition to prevent it, you really want to risk that coalition getting in, more tax, borrow & spend, centralised socialism and massive public sector ?
As I said, Cons should set a date for referendum in the near future, not now, but within 4 years, before or coinciding with next election. That would allow time to prepare, keep promises made, and placate the Liberals ( if 4 years to make a pro-argument isnt enough for them then nothing ever would be ).