Page 1 of 2
Noobert - Feedback
Posted: Tue Oct 18, 2011 4:51 pm
by Noobert
Post the feedback you have on me. Issues with me, things I can do better, etc. Things of this nature are all encouraged.
Spam will be removed though.
Thanks.
![[110.gif] :smt110](./images/smilies/110.gif)
Re: Noobert - Feedback
Posted: Tue Oct 18, 2011 10:43 pm
by Ĕɱƿŷ
Bad mod, got his position through sucking up, assumes everyone is a whiner and that mods are hard done by. Doesn't try to improve this forum, expects everyone to do his job. Extremely rude to certain users. Overall a mod who will continue to degrade the forum and its users.
Re: Noobert - Feedback
Posted: Tue Oct 18, 2011 11:19 pm
by Noobert
Ĕɱƿŷ wrote:Bad mod, got his position through sucking up, assumes everyone is a whiner and that mods are hard done by. Doesn't try to improve this forum, expects everyone to do his job. Extremely rude to certain users. Overall a mod who will continue to degrade the forum and its users.
Thanks for the love, but I never sucked up to anyone to get my position. You know that as well as anyone that I had turned down promotions long before Caprila was promoted.
I don't understand where you got the assumptions from, but they seem to be all wrong except that I am extremely rude to certain users as a
user of this forum because of how they act towards other people which bothers me. As a Moderator, I've been fair to everyone when I handle things.
Thanks again for the feedback.
Re: Noobert - Feedback
Posted: Wed Oct 19, 2011 12:24 am
by deni
Noobert wrote:Ĕɱƿŷ wrote:Bad mod, got his position through sucking up, assumes everyone is a whiner and that mods are hard done by. Doesn't try to improve this forum, expects everyone to do his job. Extremely rude to certain users. Overall a mod who will continue to degrade the forum and its users.
Thanks for the love, but I never sucked up to anyone to get my position.
As a matter of fact, Noobert was supposed to be my successor as a Market GM when I moved to General. Despite the fact that he was best qualified for the position and the oldest still active marked mod, he declined the promotion.
You should not believe everything your supposed friends tell you, Empy. They might not have had full information

Re: Noobert - Feedback
Posted: Fri Oct 21, 2011 8:42 pm
by Ĕɱƿŷ
If he was considered the best qualified for the position then it's really saying a lot about the standard of mods you hire.

Re: Noobert - Feedback
Posted: Fri Oct 21, 2011 9:20 pm
by Noobert
Ĕɱƿŷ wrote:If he was considered the best qualified for the position then it's really saying a lot about the standard of mods you hire.

Do not get upset because I refuse contact with somebody who shows pictures of penises on MSN.
All seriousness, who would you have recommended to be promoted ahead of me? I've been a steady Moderator, active in my duties, and fair to all. Although, I must admit back in the TJP vs FUALL war I was bias by deleting FUALL's threads faster than others.
Re: Noobert - Feedback
Posted: Fri Oct 21, 2011 11:56 pm
by ~Kronos~
Is there any chance we could get "red custom titles" for the forums?
I'd really like forum beast, but it doesn't look like I'll get it unless everyone can choose one. Which is unlikely, but meh, it's worth a shot. Maybe after a year of membership....
What'd ya think?
Re: Noobert - Feedback
Posted: Sat Oct 22, 2011 5:07 pm
by Ĕɱƿŷ
Noobert wrote:Ĕɱƿŷ wrote:If he was considered the best qualified for the position then it's really saying a lot about the standard of mods you hire.

Do not get upset because I refuse contact with somebody who shows pictures of penises on MSN.
All seriousness, who would you have recommended to be promoted ahead of me? I've been a steady Moderator, active in my duties, and fair to all. Although, I must admit back in the TJP vs FUALL war I was bias by deleting FUALL's threads faster than others.
I would've promoted ANY of the other mods over you.
Re: Noobert - Feedback
Posted: Sat Oct 22, 2011 6:17 pm
by Noobert
Can you give a valid reason, with proof? Otherwise, you are just trolling as always..

Re: Noobert - Feedback
Posted: Sat Oct 22, 2011 6:54 pm
by Ĕɱƿŷ
I sure can,
Noobert wrote:Although, I must admit back in the TJP vs FUALL war I was bias by deleting FUALL's threads faster than others.
Re: Noobert - Feedback
Posted: Sat Oct 22, 2011 7:01 pm
by Noobert
Ĕɱƿŷ wrote:I sure can,
Noobert wrote:Although, I must admit back in the TJP vs FUALL war I was bias by deleting FUALL's threads faster than others.
I pity the fool who cannot read sarcasm.
Pity indeed.
Re: Noobert - Feedback
Posted: Sat Oct 22, 2011 10:19 pm
by ~Kronos~
Ĕɱƿŷ wrote:I sure can,
Noobert wrote:Although, I must admit back in the TJP vs FUALL war I was bias by deleting FUALL's threads faster than others.
Not that I am interested in this conversation much, or your reason (so don't worry about giving it on my account) but.... if you say "I sure can," shouldn't you give a reason? It looks as if you don't have one. Just saying, you kinda left that one open ended.
Well, enjoy

Re: Noobert - Feedback
Posted: Sun Oct 23, 2011 8:04 am
by Zeratul
Unfortunately each such title has to be set up one at a time by an admin. As said in the PM, we'll take the request into consideration.
Re: Noobert - Feedback
Posted: Sun Oct 23, 2011 11:01 pm
by jedi~tank
Noobert is great when he wants to be and a complete ass when he wants to be, but hey he wouldnt be Noobert of he was any other way. A dam good mod and could run this forum with ease..if he wanted.
Re: Noobert - Feedback
Posted: Sun Oct 23, 2011 11:10 pm
by Noobert
Jedi~Tank wrote:Noobert is great when he wants to be and a complete ass when he wants to be, but hey he wouldnt be Noobert of he was any other way. A dam good mod and could run this forum with ease..if he wanted.
Aww..
![[050.gif] :smt050](./images/smilies/050.gif)
The love. It burns. MAKE IT STOP, MAKE IT STOP.
![[100.gif] :smt100](./images/smilies/100.gif)