Page 1 of 4
Juliette
Posted: Wed Oct 19, 2011 12:20 am
by Juliette
Post the feedback you have on me. Issues with me, things I can do better, etc. Things of this nature are all encouraged.
Thanks.
Re: Juliette
Posted: Wed Oct 19, 2011 12:43 am
by Dubby_CompGamerGeek2
As I do with many members of the volunteer staff,
I find it difficult to separate my feelings and opinions of Juliette as a user versus Juliette as a moderator/member of the forum staff,
but I will attempt to do so here.
I find that Juliette usually / always treats me very well.
I find that Juliette usually treats a large portion of the user base with rudeness, cynicism and contempt...
I can't imagine being someone on the bad side of a staff member, whether in their role as user or as staff member,
and then actually trying to approach the staff member because I need something...
That would be the point at which I would either decide it wasn't worth asking, or I would get an intermediary staff member that I could trust to act as a go-between.
<< misses Jadzia... Juliette's sweet-hearted alter-ego from long ago.
![[090.gif] :smt090](./images/smilies/090.gif)
Re: Juliette
Posted: Wed Oct 19, 2011 12:46 am
by Ĕɱƿŷ
Always been respectful, actually went out of her way to help me with my problem and did it quickly and thoroughly. Actually knows how to do her job without causing controversy. The other mods would be wise to take a page out of your book and for that I thank you for doing your best to keep this forum in a respectable state.
Re: Juliette
Posted: Wed Oct 19, 2011 6:43 am
by ~Dä Vinci~
makes stuff up -.-*
Re: Juliette
Posted: Wed Oct 19, 2011 8:19 am
by Legendary Apophis
Was/is objective in modding and did (still do I guess) explain her modding to the concerned ones (of moderating/editing/warning by her). Is very helpful to people having game issues by forwarding it to Jason.
That's what I have to say about Juliette as a moderator/staff member.

Re: Juliette
Posted: Wed Oct 19, 2011 9:28 am
by Zeratul
Is about to be disemboweled...
Oh, wait... thats a spammishly styled secret...
(you already know what we'd say, and its generally positive...)
Re: Juliette
Posted: Wed Oct 19, 2011 9:29 am
by Guild
patronising
Re: Juliette
Posted: Wed Oct 19, 2011 10:11 am
by RoKeT
Guild wrote:patronising
again I hate to agree with him but you can be very patronizing, although I play dumber then I should most of the time so maybe I deserve it
![[017.gif] :smt017](./images/smilies/017.gif)
Still love you though it's one of the things that defines you
![[060.gif] :smt060](./images/smilies/060.gif)
Re: Juliette
Posted: Thu Oct 20, 2011 9:43 am
by Juliette
Guild wrote:patronising
So, do I need to get better at that? Good thing, bad thing, don't you dare ever do it again?
Dubby_CompGamerGeek2 wrote:I find it difficult to separate my feelings and opinions of Juliette as a user versus Juliette as a moderator/member of the forum staff,
but I will attempt to do so here.
You failed. See next bit.
Dubby_CompGamerGeek2 wrote:I find that Juliette usually treats a large portion of the user base with rudeness, cynicism and contempt...
I do that as a user, yes..
![[018.gif] :smt018](./images/smilies/018.gif)
But you are right, I do do that. It is not something personal, really. Rather, it is personal if I am nice.

PM me examples of me being a contemptuous mod, please. Could be another one of those situations where I don't know how people read what I say. Had a good monologue with Guild about that earlier.
Re: Juliette
Posted: Thu Oct 20, 2011 9:56 am
by ~Dä Vinci~
brown noses people who scam, follows the biggest wallet. theres a word for that.. ive never really been mad at julliet with our playful banter but stop closeing the thread.
Re: Juliette
Posted: Thu Oct 20, 2011 9:58 am
by ~wolverine~
~Da Vinci~ wrote:brown noses people who scam, follows the biggest wallet. theres a word for that.. ive never really been mad at julliet with our playful banter but stop closeing the thread.
Re: Juliette
Posted: Thu Oct 20, 2011 10:00 am
by ~LordRse~
On msn = good.
On this forum = Picking sides.
Re: Juliette
Posted: Thu Oct 20, 2011 10:03 am
by Juliette
Picking sides? I locked the thread after you guys scammed the scammer out of his account. I could not care less about that situation.
When I lock the thread, and it is reposted, and reported, I act on the report and the rules.
Explain to me how that's picking sides. Wim.
@Tom: Hi. If Ace didn't have the money to buy that account, explain to me how I am following the biggest wallet? In that thread, that would be FM himself.

Re: Juliette
Posted: Thu Oct 20, 2011 10:06 am
by ~Dä Vinci~
he did have the money he chose not to pay because well i really don't know.. he said himself he didn't know why and he felt bad but he still tried to sell the account befor jason removed it from him making himself a tasty $900. im sorry but the people who did it shouldn't be classed as a scammer... there a hero a handsom hero very smart
Re: Juliette
Posted: Thu Oct 20, 2011 10:09 am
by Legendary Apophis
In my opinion, about the lock, as far as I know about this forum being a member of it since month #2 of its existence, when people apologized (in this case, Ace, when/if he will) about their action, they usually did it in a separate thread, among reasons it was done so, for it to be noticed more by people, and it being a different thing than the scam itself (to show they are done with their past self and move to a new path).
I've apologized myself in past (not for scamming as I never did that) in a separate thread to where the skirmish was going on, and so did most of the numerous people who apologized for anything (forum behaving, scamming, cheating, being rude on msn...).
That's my interpretation about it.