Julietta Putina wrote:You seem not to understand the concept of bigotry.Legendary Apophis wrote:This word "bigot" I see rising up every time this subject is brought in, looks to me to be one of those words overused at every situation, mostly wrongly, just like "racism", "communism" and "fascism".
Semper didn't sound "bigot" at all, at least to me. However, sorry to say that, but Avenger sounds to be a bigot regarding homosexuality subject. A hardcore one might I add.
Stating your intent to kill all homosexuals is absolutely the opposite of bigotry. Bigotry would be saying "oh, we are all equal" and then snort derisively while you poke fun at homosexuals for their being funny.
Indeed.
Hmmm...I just consider this concept differently than you do I suppose. I agree with one of the definitions of wikipedia:
A bigot is a person obstinately or intolerantly devoted to his or her own opinions and prejudices, especially one exhibiting intolerance, and animosity toward those of differing beliefs.
Which fits perfectly not only the ultraconservatives but also in another way the political correctness/neo conformist warriors one can see in the medias and internet medias.
Julietta Putina wrote:Allowing homosexuals to adopt children will improve the welfare of those children. Of course, fat white kids should not be adopted by anyone, but rather sent to the uranium mines in the Kongo. Rather allow eighteen of mister Deepak Halalali's twenty children to die of hard labour, one to flourish in their native habitat, and one to flourish in the undeniably better environment of Steve and Adam. Uh-yeah.
Well there are also many heterosexuals who want to adopt children for various reasons, some of them very logical and obvious. So it's not like welfare of children-in-need cannot already be improved with all the heterosexual couples who want/need to adopt, and I do think they are also an "undeniably better environment" for said children, also having one other advantage of having a balanced couple roles-wise (mother and father). Mother and father have different roles, I have been a child myself too and I noticed pretty much the difficulty of having the separation and seeing my father less. But I still have a father even if I see him less as he lives far. But, how can it be considered to be stability when there's no father at all or no mother at all? That's not even like single parent raised children, as there you have two mothers/no father or two fathers/no mother, talk about confusion. It's not even about how other kids would make jokes, because they always do anyway. It's something more serious than that.