StarGateWars Forums

take a look at the list of 1 Commander officers.

If in Attack pages you see ???? in that list, they are completely reveal.
Ta. .tammmmmmmmmm

If you are talking about the commander's officers list, then yes their stats are revealed to you there and yet still hidden on the attack page.

I think this is deliberate, as you can see stats of fellow officer's of your commander, but not the stats of officer's of other commanders. It kind of makes sense that you can see the other guys following the same commander as you.

If you are not talking about this, then I don't know, as your post is kind of vague.

What's the point to talk about my CO? check others CO.. Since I did stipulate there:
THAKE THE LIST OF anyONE COMMANDER.. not My Commander..

It wasn't suppose to be follow by everyone, just by those who can see the picture....

Errrrrrrrrrrrrrr, I have no idea what you mean.

I see no other problems or bugs. From what I can see, nothing is visible of other commanders or their officer's to me......


Edit: Yes, you can see the Naq/Pop of officer's of other commander's in the officer's list if your covert is high enough (like the attack pages), and you get access to all your commander's officer's Naq/Pop by default in the officer's list but not attack page. What is the problem?

Edit: Yes, you can see the Naq/Pop of officer's of other commanders in the officer's list if your covert is high enough (like the attack pages)

well, then you have a Huge Spy lvl to put it this way.

me for example:
Stiffy McBoing 1 ????? CoW ????? Naquadah
and if I look in his CO list:
Stiffy McBoing CoW xx1,500 1 x,139,572,710

Now.. what's wrong now?

Nope, it's just you:

his page wrote:Name: Stiffy McBoing
Commander: ROB3RT
Race Name: CoW
Rank: 1
Realm Population: ? ?????
Treasury: ? ????? Naquadah

his commander's page wrote:Stiffy McBoing CoW ????? 1 ?????

It's fine for everyone else.........

so definitely something is wrong in there.

HgE wrote:so definitely something is wrong in there.

To just you and (seemingly) no one else, how is admin going to find and try to resolve that? Everyone uses the same code, it's going to be a toughie to fix.

You sure it's not just your covert being stupidly high?

LuBu wrote:

HgE wrote:so definitely something is wrong in there.

To just you, how is admin going to find and try to resolve that? Everyone uses the same code, it's going to be a toughie to fix.

First of all, I shouldn't be able to see behind ??????? in any Commander List.
That's enough.

HgE wrote:

LuBu wrote:

HgE wrote:so definitely something is wrong in there.

To just you, how is admin going to find and try to resolve that? Everyone uses the same code, it's going to be a toughie to fix.

First of all, I shouldn't be able to see behind ??????? in any Commander List.
That's enough.

Yes you are, IF your covert is high enough, like the attack pages.

Lubu wrote:You sure it's not just your covert being stupidly high?

Even if my SPY lvl it's Huge, The fact is I still can't see his in Attack Page, in his personal Page.

So why should I be able to see him in a stupid Co List?

HgE wrote:Even if my SPY lvl it's Huge, The fact is I still can't see his in Attack Page, in his personal Page.

So why should I be able to see him in a stupid Co List?

Idk, it's fine for me, hard to say. But I don't know why you ask that if you already know the answer though lol. As I've already said, you shouldn't UNLESS you have the covert.

I understand that you don't have a high covert, so I see your problem.

how can be ok?
I mean if you have C 40 in main and you still see ????? you go to his Commander to see what is the armysize and what Naq (if it were)?

HgE wrote:how can be ok?
I mean if you have C 40 in main and you still see ????? you go to his Commander to see what is the armysize and what Naq (if it were)?

I know that, duh. But if you keep responding stating that something is wrong and repeating yourself, despite me saying many times that it is wrong IF you don't have the covert and see it (thus agreeing with you), it isn't helping anything. What point are you trying to make, I never said you were lying or it wasn't true.

It is okay for others, IF like me, there isn't a problem or bug with it. That is my point. I get it is a problem for you, did the second time you explained it, repeating it is doing nothing, okay?!?!?

Now stop replying the same things over and over, that something isn't right (which I get!), and wait for Jason to get back.