Perg. CAP
Posted: Thu Feb 16, 2012 2:05 pm
To go back up to 56 mil UU
please add youre opinions
please add youre opinions
Or, if it must be changed:
Eärendil wrote:go down to 30m
StarGateWars Forums
These are the forums for the GateWa.rs family of text-based space-centred PBBGs
https://talk.gatewa.rs/
Perg. CAP
Page 1 of 2
Re: Perg. CAP
Posted: Thu Feb 16, 2012 2:07 pm
No. No reason to change it.
Or, if it must be changed:
Or, if it must be changed:
Re: Perg. CAP
Posted: Thu Feb 16, 2012 2:33 pm
Eärendil wrote:go down to 30m
Re: Perg. CAP
Posted: Fri Feb 17, 2012 12:08 am
It shouldn't go up. The point of perg is misunderstood by many players who want an easy time to build.
Re: Perg. CAP
Posted: Fri Feb 17, 2012 7:21 pm
Leave it as is, seriously. If you want to enforce a lower cap then the 10%, go in there yourself, and do it yourself.
You don't see them coming along to main, complaining about stuff, saying things like reduce the plague limit, limit this, limit that.
You don't see them coming along to main, complaining about stuff, saying things like reduce the plague limit, limit this, limit that.
Re: Perg. CAP
Posted: Sat Feb 18, 2012 12:12 pm
Isn't that exactly what happened here, though?Sarevok wrote:Leave it as is, seriously. If you want to enforce a lower cap then the 10%, go in there yourself, and do it yourself.
You don't see them coming along to main, complaining about stuff, saying things like reduce the plague limit, limit this, limit that.
Re: Perg. CAP
Posted: Sat Feb 18, 2012 12:16 pm
I think Earendil made that point already, no need to keep on about it. Anyway 00RA00 won't return to this thread, he hardly ever does.ربهالنوع wrote:Isn't that exactly what happened here, though?Sarevok wrote:Leave it as is, seriously. If you want to enforce a lower cap then the 10%, go in there yourself, and do it yourself.
You don't see them coming along to main, complaining about stuff, saying things like reduce the plague limit, limit this, limit that.
Re: Perg. CAP
Posted: Mon Feb 20, 2012 1:53 am
Isn't he commenting on he's own realm (assuming they are from perg, which I wasn't aware of) and not saying to do something to main?ربهالنوع wrote:Isn't that exactly what happened here, though?Sarevok wrote:Leave it as is, seriously. If you want to enforce a lower cap then the 10%, go in there yourself, and do it yourself.
You don't see them coming along to main, complaining about stuff, saying things like reduce the plague limit, limit this, limit that.
Re: Perg. CAP
Posted: Fri Feb 24, 2012 9:48 am
MY OPInon is that THE PERG cap should go UP past 60m because of how big the army sizes are getting , and that perg is used to grow and ascend
how about suggesting we lower the plague limit to a 400m army size instead of 570? \
how about suggesting we lower the plague limit to a 400m army size instead of 570? \
Re: Perg. CAP
Posted: Fri Mar 09, 2012 7:52 am
Clarkey wrote:I think Eärendil made that point already, no need to keep on about it. Anyway 00RA00 won't return to this thread, he hardly ever does.ربهالنوع wrote:Isn't that exactly what happened here, though?Sarevok wrote:Leave it as is, seriously. If you want to enforce a lower cap then the 10%, go in there yourself, and do it yourself.
You don't see them coming along to main, complaining about stuff, saying things like reduce the plague limit, limit this, limit that.
Im here and well to the 1 who says explain youreself, well basically with the UU CAP it means you can only do up to the 20th asention (OE) in perg, past that and youve gotta cum out, i think you should atleast beable to do them all and a 56 CAP would allow this and as matty said perg is a place to grow in and the CAP stops this, hope thats made things clearer. SAFE
Re: Perg. CAP
Posted: Fri Mar 09, 2012 9:21 am
00RA00 wrote:Clarkey wrote:I think Eärendil made that point already, no need to keep on about it. Anyway 00RA00 won't return to this thread, he hardly ever does.ربهالنوع wrote:Isn't that exactly what happened here, though?Sarevok wrote:Leave it as is, seriously. If you want to enforce a lower cap then the 10%, go in there yourself, and do it yourself.
You don't see them coming along to main, complaining about stuff, saying things like reduce the plague limit, limit this, limit that.
Im here and well to the 1 who says explain youreself, well basically with the UU CAP it means you can only do up to the 20th asention (OE) in perg, past that and youve gotta cum out, i think you should atleast beable to do them all and a 56 CAP would allow this and as matty said perg is a place to grow in and the CAP stops this, hope thats made things clearer. SAFE
Perg is a place for NEW players to grow. Why would we want people sitting close to
untouchable for all the ascensions?
Re: Perg. CAP
Posted: Fri Mar 09, 2012 1:53 pm
You clearly fail to understand the purpose of perg. Why do you feel you should be able to stay in perg to asend 23 times?00RA00 wrote:Clarkey wrote:I think Eärendil made that point already, no need to keep on about it. Anyway 00RA00 won't return to this thread, he hardly ever does.ربهالنوع wrote:Isn't that exactly what happened here, though?Sarevok wrote:Leave it as is, seriously. If you want to enforce a lower cap then the 10%, go in there yourself, and do it yourself.
You don't see them coming along to main, complaining about stuff, saying things like reduce the plague limit, limit this, limit that.
Im here and well to the 1 who says explain youreself, well basically with the UU CAP it means you can only do up to the 20th asention (OE) in perg, past that and youve gotta cum out, i think you should atleast beable to do them all and a 56 CAP would allow this and as matty said perg is a place to grow in and the CAP stops this, hope thats made things clearer. SAFE
To help us grasp your understanding of perg please explain what you see the purpose of perg being?
Re: Perg. CAP
Posted: Fri Mar 09, 2012 10:43 pm
In short, this is a realm in which the rate of play is dictated by normal turn generation - for each player independently, since one player cannot 'give' resources to another. This should also eliminate the 'blackmail' or 'extortion' since the threat of continual massing is limited to enemy turns available/generated. Plus without the ability to actually give the extortionist resources while in Pergatory, the demands they can make are severely limited.Clarkey wrote:You clearly fail to understand the purpose of perg. Why do you feel you should be able to stay in perg to asend 23 times?
Doesn't say you shouldn't be able to ascend fully.
Re: Perg. CAP
Posted: Sat Mar 10, 2012 12:05 am
Sarevok wrote:In short, this is a realm in which the rate of play is dictated by normal turn generation - for each player independently, since one player cannot 'give' resources to another. This should also eliminate the 'blackmail' or 'extortion' since the threat of continual massing is limited to enemy turns available/generated. Plus without the ability to actually give the extortionist resources while in Pergatory, the demands they can make are severely limited.Clarkey wrote:You clearly fail to understand the purpose of perg. Why do you feel you should be able to stay in perg to asend 23 times?
Doesn't say you shouldn't be able to ascend fully.
You clearly fail to grasp the purpose of perg aswell. Perg is not a place to hide from extortionists. People can easily extort those in perg from outside perg.
Re: Perg. CAP
Posted: Sat Mar 10, 2012 3:19 am
Tis the original description as listed in the updates. And it seems to pretty clearly outline that you can go there, and be better protected from extortion.
And what is *your* understanding of the purpose of it? It was never intended to be a place for new players, just those with less time to play the game. How it has developed or now perceived is irrelevant. Its original purpose, was to provide a slow game-play style
And what is *your* understanding of the purpose of it? It was never intended to be a place for new players, just those with less time to play the game. How it has developed or now perceived is irrelevant. Its original purpose, was to provide a slow game-play style