Page 1 of 2

Sabotage Bug?

Posted: Thu May 10, 2012 1:13 pm
by Wolfstien
So, I see this target I would like to take out. I see that it should be an easy sab so I started sabbing.
Image

About 7 sabs in I realized, hey I'm not doing very much damage. It's only taking 65 weapons that can't be right.

Image

Also here are the weapons:
Image

I apologize if I am out of line for posting these. Please remove them if I am. I just can't seem to find out what I was doing wrong. Some input would be nice. :)

Re: Sabotage Bug?

Posted: Thu May 10, 2012 1:17 pm
by Guild
add an extra 100 to your sab see if that works

Re: Sabotage Bug?

Posted: Thu May 10, 2012 1:18 pm
by Wolfstien
I would but this happened yesterday.

Re: Sabotage Bug?

Posted: Thu May 10, 2012 2:31 pm
by Sol
Guild wrote:add an extra 100 to your sab see if that works

^ what he said, is probably the cause, how much you kill depends on the difference of covert action with respect to a max.

Re: Sabotage Bug?

Posted: Thu May 10, 2012 2:34 pm
by Wolfstien
Sol wrote:
Guild wrote:add an extra 100 to your sab see if that works

^ what he said, is probably the cause, how much you kill depends on the difference of covert action with respect to a max.


I had like 1.2 tril covert. I still would expect more...

Re: Sabotage Bug?

Posted: Thu May 10, 2012 2:39 pm
by Sol
Wolfstien wrote:
Sol wrote:
Guild wrote:add an extra 100 to your sab see if that works

^ what he said, is probably the cause, how much you kill depends on the difference of covert action with respect to a max.


I had like 1.2 tril covert. I still would expect more...

Did you use all of your spies? or part of them?

Re: Sabotage Bug?

Posted: Thu May 10, 2012 2:42 pm
by Wolfstien
Ah, I think I see what your getting at. I had 7 mil spies and only sent in the minimum.

Re: Sabotage Bug?

Posted: Thu May 10, 2012 2:53 pm
by Sarevok
Never use above the minimum. It is a complete waste, and you take more spy losses.

Its possibly as a result of a high realm alert (try hitting them 2x quickly, and see if the second is blocked), which is boosting their defensive power.

It could well be a bug, based on the number of weapons they have. You should be taking out alot more

Re: Sabotage Bug?

Posted: Thu May 10, 2012 2:57 pm
by Sol
Wolfstien wrote:Ah, I think I see what your getting at. I had 7 mil spies and only sent in the minimum.

;)

Re: Sabotage Bug?

Posted: Thu May 10, 2012 2:59 pm
by Wolfstien
Sarevok wrote:Never use above the minimum. It is a complete waste, and you take more spy losses.

Its possibly as a result of a high realm alert (try hitting them 2x quickly, and see if the second is blocked), which is boosting their defensive power.

It could well be a bug, based on the number of weapons they have. You should be taking out alot more


Which is why I used minimum. I think what SoL is saying is that the more I would use the more I would take out. Makes sense yeah, but I figure I would still take out a lot more. It's all so...confusing. :neutral:

Re: Sabotage Bug?

Posted: Thu May 10, 2012 3:07 pm
by Lokiā„¢
Seems like a bug to me. 65 small weps is no where near 3% of the total weapon power.

Re: Sabotage Bug?

Posted: Thu May 10, 2012 3:09 pm
by BarelyAllen
This is dumb. Use 5,000 more than minimum, always, and you're set :D it sabs by how much MORE you have than the enemy.

Re: Sabotage Bug?

Posted: Thu May 10, 2012 3:29 pm
by Wolfstien
2 outcomes:

1. I sab 3%
2. I fail and lose half my spies.

I didn't lose and there is no way I sabbed only 3%.

Re: Sabotage Bug?

Posted: Thu May 10, 2012 3:35 pm
by Borek
Aye the damage you do to enemy weaps is based on the amount you succeed by. It is possible to send the bear minimum number of spies and succeed, and do minimal damage such as has happened here. Had you increased the number of spies sent even by 1 or 2 then the damage would have jumped to the "normal" 3%.

Re: Sabotage Bug?

Posted: Thu May 10, 2012 3:47 pm
by Wolfstien
:smt017 So I take it I am the only one whose tried bare minimum and done this little of damage. Is it random when this happens? Because I know other times I've sabbed this hasn't happened.