StarGateWars Forums

Ok I cannot find a thread or post that can tell me how newgrounds will be linked to main???

Can someone explain this please??

How it will be linked and what can be gained from playing newgrounds???

The last ascension in newgrounds will ascend your account into the main server.
This new main account will be fully ascended, have 35/34 covert levels, 500bil MS and 50t naq banked.

Loki™ wrote:The last ascension in newgrounds will ascend your account into the main server.
This new main account will be fully ascended, have 35/34 covert levels, 500bil MS and 50t naq banked.

+
250k UP
52T naq
AT's 4k (2k tradeable, 2k non-tradeable)
10m super attackers/defenders
50m UU
100m minders

etc..
(And a crappy 400B MS; 100k/150k/100k slots)

do you get a ascended account ?

Dark Lord Tacoma wrote:do you get a ascended account ?

Admin said something about giving them a crappy asc account.

ya, i believe the ability to have two ascended accounts (and main accounts) will happen.

Sol wrote:ya, i believe the ability to have two ascended accounts (and main accounts) will happen.

Which is ridiculous BS.

That is what Jason said, Legit multi's.

Sol wrote:ya, i believe the ability to have two ascended accounts (and main accounts) will happen.

This will cause all manner of problems for policing non-legit multis i expect. It seems like a large bullet hole in the foot to me.

The ability to transfer information across games is already possible (main to ascension) so why not just have the newgrounds accounts do a similar thing? Of course, if someone does not have a main/ascension account the creation of one as detailed above would be logical.

SuperSaiyan wrote:

GhostyGoo wrote:

Sol wrote:ya, i believe the ability to have two ascended accounts (and main accounts) will happen.

This will cause all manner of problems for policing non-legit multis i expect.

I think Admin said at the last meet NG "Multis" will be flagged in-game with something.

we need to remember this update to the game ready for the annual gate wars awards for the bigest fail aaward

Amusing how you all gloss over the fact that this might work, well, differently. You are applying familiar concepts on something new, which you do not even know the specifics of. So in short, you are complaining about what 'might' be a problem at some point, without knowing whether it even could be a problem.
Admin is no fool.

id say the word multi is considered a bad thing by the vast majoraty of the players in this game so esentualy allowing them will only lead to problems hope im wrong but bet i arnt

Dark Lord Tacoma wrote:id say the word multi is considered a bad thing by the vast majoraty of the players in this game so esentualy allowing them will only lead to problems hope im wrong but bet i arnt

Yes, so calling the concept 'multi' is colouring a picture of which none of us have a clear image. It is like deciding not to plant grain, because it looks too much like wheat, without ever having seen any of those.

Cersei Lannister wrote:

Dark Lord Tacoma wrote:id say the word multi is considered a bad thing by the vast majoraty of the players in this game so esentualy allowing them will only lead to problems hope im wrong but bet i arnt

Yes, so calling the concept 'multi' is colouring a picture of which none of us have a clear image. It is like deciding not to plant grain, because it looks too much like wheat, without ever having seen any of those.

so your sugesting we sit quetly and allow jason to dress this wolf as a sheep and acsept it into our flock without consideration for what it will do in the future

Dark Lord Tacoma wrote:so your sugesting we sit quetly and allow jason to dress this wolf as a sheep and acsept it into our flock without consideration for what it will do in the future

No, absolutely not. I am suggesting we wait for Jason to clarify, and then pounce.
Just get him to give a straight up answer at the next admin meet.