Page 1 of 1

Commander be the officer of his officer?

Posted: Tue Feb 07, 2006 1:46 pm
by Stricken
well can he? that would be weird


8)

Posted: Tue Feb 07, 2006 2:11 pm
by The Xeno
It wouldn't be a first.
Unusual but not unheard of.

Posted: Tue Feb 07, 2006 2:12 pm
by Guest
good question i wuold like to know they answer to

Posted: Tue Feb 07, 2006 5:35 pm
by Stricken
lol no definte answers

Posted: Tue Feb 07, 2006 10:25 pm
by Flavar
why does nobody try it out?

Posted: Wed Feb 08, 2006 4:44 am
by The Xeno
Striken wrote:lol no definte answers

............
Here is a definant answer... yes.
I saw it a while back one one of my farms.
Then on some other dude randomly reconing.

Posted: Wed Feb 08, 2006 8:09 am
by Stricken
i'm still trying to fihure out even if you do it, how would it help you?

lol me and my crazy ideas :-D

Posted: Wed Feb 08, 2006 12:35 pm
by NanoGod
you cant do it, you'll get a message:
' You can not report to your own officer'

plus if it was possbile, you both recieve each other UP bonus, and you would both get each others 30% na per turns, this will only benefit one person the one with the lower UP or naq income

Posted: Wed Feb 08, 2006 1:09 pm
by Stricken
Boa wrote:you cant do it, you'll get a message:
' You can not report to your own officer'

plus if it was possbile, you both recieve each other UP bonus, and you would both get each others 30% na per turns, this will only benefit one person the one with the lower UP or naq income


lol that bites, but is cool if your the weak one, then the weak one should just become the officer of the strong one :-D

thx for everyone input

Posted: Wed Feb 08, 2006 1:18 pm
by The Xeno
plus if it was possbile, you both recieve each other UP bonus, and you would both get each others 30% na per turns, this will only benefit one person the one with the lower UP or naq income

Wait a second...
I thought we were talking about three players, A, B, and C.
Where A is the officer of B and the commander of C
And C is the commander of B.

It sounds like you are suggesting we only have two players?
Have I misunderstood?

<SelfEdit>
](*,) Always, Always, double check what you thought the meaning of the question was. Esp. If you were dead tired at the time, forgive my misunderstanding.
No, you cannot be both officer and commander to the same person.

Posted: Wed Feb 08, 2006 1:24 pm
by Stricken
lol anyways you answered another of my questions without me even having to ask it so TY :-D

Posted: Wed Feb 08, 2006 9:25 pm
by Tenkari
though i have one question, whats the point of being your own commander? I forget who i saw, but I remember seeing someone who was their own commander, I even clicked on the peerson who was the officer, same person, not someone with a name that looked the same, example someone who replaced a small L with a big i.

Posted: Thu Feb 09, 2006 6:15 am
by ohknee0
Tenkari wrote:though i have one question, whats the point of being your own commander? I forget who i saw, but I remember seeing someone who was their own commander, I even clicked on the peerson who was the officer, same person, not someone with a name that looked the same, example someone who replaced a small L with a big i.


Commanderless Warriors:
If you have no commander, you have 2 alternatives:
1)Keep no commander. You will get a 10% bonus on income, and a 10% bonus on military unit generation when you have no commander. This is the lone wolf stamina kicking in.
2)Make yourself your own commander. This will earn you a 20% bonus on military unit generation (including unique clicks)as your self-inflated ego will draw additional troops to you.

Posted: Thu Feb 09, 2006 6:36 am
by The Xeno
It's almost always best to get a commander untill you have a high UP (4K+)
or a high income at which point the percentages will really kick in.
Otherwise the commanders protection, help and naq will make up for any lose in production.

Posted: Thu Feb 09, 2006 7:33 am
by Flavar
yes and well there is a search button. for the being your own commander question.

dammit i simple cant do it right :oops: :oops: :oops: :oops: