why is it that larger strike on a smaller defense causes...
-
- Forum Regular
- Posts: 550
- Joined: Thu Apr 19, 2007 8:00 am
- ID: 2147483647
why is it that larger strike on a smaller defense causes...
a greater loss in units to the attacker?
If you do business with me don't be afraid to leave some feedback. Link is below
http://herebegames.com/StarGateWarsNew/ ... 9#p1414699
eliminate 308101 of steeoo3114's Covert Ops!
It was confirmed that 447,244 of steeoo3114's forces fell at the hands of Antistatic's assult.
Targeted Spacial Distortions Defense 5515428 5750/5750
http://herebegames.com/StarGateWarsNew/ ... 9#p1414699
I'm gonna be all over that like a system lord with a new host.-Starranger
Spoiler
It was confirmed that 447,244 of steeoo3114's forces fell at the hands of Antistatic's assult.
Targeted Spacial Distortions Defense 5515428 5750/5750
-
- Forum Regular
- Posts: 570
- Joined: Sun Sep 02, 2012 12:12 pm
- Alliance: TAF
- ID: 0
- Alternate name(s): Melloyello heining. Harshfello noob the list goes on :)
- Location: In the server picking fights with noobs
Re: why is it that larger strike on a smaller defense causes
Antistatic wrote:a greater loss in units to the attacker?
Your traveling to their realm therfore you lose more units as they are used to their realm...
-
- Spark of the Ori
- Posts: 5342
- Joined: Fri Feb 17, 2006 10:30 am
- Alliance: DDE - Leader
- Race: System Lord
- ID: 1909457
- Alternate name(s): Kjarkur, JL, KJ
- Location: Mutilating enemies of the Empire
Re: why is it that larger strike on a smaller defense causes
Warring is expensive.
If you wish to crush somebody's defense, it's has a cost.
-KJ
If you wish to crush somebody's defense, it's has a cost.
-KJ
There are no men like me. There's only me.
General & Battle Moderator
General & Battle Moderator
- > SGW Hall of Fame
- > SGW's Hero of the Year
- > SGW's Villain of the year 2010->
- > SGW's Most Missed Player of the year 2011->
- Z E R O
- Forum Addict
- Posts: 3908
- Joined: Fri Nov 30, 2007 11:04 am
- Alliance: Jötunheim
- Race: NanoTiMaster
- ID: 1918344
- Alternate name(s): Hymir
- Location: Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
Re: why is it that larger strike on a smaller defense causes
Moved.
Z E R O - Jötunheim - 1907332 - UnKnown of the TOLAH
*Zero - 1991093
Spoiler
-
- Forum Regular
- Posts: 732
- Joined: Wed Dec 14, 2005 5:00 pm
- Race: Flemish
- ID: 1992397
- Location: Belgium
- Contact:
Re: why is it that larger strike on a smaller defense causes
death by Friendly fire?
being normal is also overrated, you must have faith in who you are
-
Juliette Verified
- The Queen
- Posts: 31802
- Joined: Sun Feb 06, 2005 6:57 pm
- Race: Royalty
- ID: 4323
- Alternate name(s): Cersei Lannister
- Location: Ultima Thule
Re: why is it that larger strike on a smaller defense causes
Yes, I like this answer.Biohazard79 wrote:death by Friendly fire?
More people = more guns = more misfires = more accidents = more casualties / fatalities.
- Loki™
- Forum Elder
- Posts: 2464
- Joined: Sat Sep 02, 2006 12:43 am
- Alliance: Jötunheim
- Race: System Lord
- ID: 41339
- Alternate name(s): Lloth, Sargonnas, D4ywalk3r
Re: why is it that larger strike on a smaller defense causes
Juliette wrote:Yes, I like this answer.Biohazard79 wrote:death by Friendly fire?
More people = more guns = more misfires = more accidents = more casualties / fatalities.
How do you explain what happened when I attacked 2t def with 3t strike and lost 56mil attackers? (I had like 150mil trained and forgot to untrain )
Spoiler
Spoiler
George Hazard says:
thats what happens, HVE takes your soul and gives you an awesome high
when you leave, you can't live without it
thats what happens, HVE takes your soul and gives you an awesome high
when you leave, you can't live without it
The forces of Loki™ rush in full force, and inflict 1,086,054,534,340,000 damage on Pooop's forces!
It was confirmed that 12,620,737 of Pooop's forces fell at the hands of Loki™'s assult.
The forces of Pooop fought back with all they could, and managed to inflict 481,837,854,506,000 damage on Loki™'s forces!
They managed to eradicate 1,988,050 of Loki™'s troops.
-
Juliette Verified
- The Queen
- Posts: 31802
- Joined: Sun Feb 06, 2005 6:57 pm
- Race: Royalty
- ID: 4323
- Alternate name(s): Cersei Lannister
- Location: Ultima Thule
Re: why is it that larger strike on a smaller defense causes
Many people pressed into attacking with not enough weapons will start fighting each other for the weapons, killing millions.Loki™ wrote:Juliette wrote:Yes, I like this answer.Biohazard79 wrote:death by Friendly fire?
More people = more guns = more misfires = more accidents = more casualties / fatalities.
How do you explain what happened when I attacked 2t def with 3t strike and lost 56mil attackers? (I had like 150mil trained and forgot to untrain )
- ~Odin~
- Alföðr
- Posts: 6478
- Joined: Tue Apr 24, 2007 8:23 pm
- Alliance: The Collective
- Race: International Pimp
- ID: 0
Re: why is it that larger strike on a smaller defense causes
Juliette wrote:Many people pressed into attacking with not enough weapons will start fighting each other for the weapons, killing millions.Loki™ wrote:Juliette wrote:Yes, I like this answer.Biohazard79 wrote:death by Friendly fire?
More people = more guns = more misfires = more accidents = more casualties / fatalities.
How do you explain what happened when I attacked 2t def with 3t strike and lost 56mil attackers? (I had like 150mil trained and forgot to untrain )
how epic would that be if this wasnt a text based game lol, pure anarchy lol.
The forces of harchester fought back with all they could, and managed to inflict 145,573,411,725,000 damage
The forces of harchester fought back with all they could, and managed to inflict 3 damage
The forces of harchester fought back with all they could, and managed to inflict 3 damage
TGW Annual Community Awards 2014/2015
Spoiler
- [BoT] Jason
- Forum History
- Posts: 10120
- Joined: Mon Sep 29, 2008 12:37 am
- Alliance: TA
- Race: DIEDAYDIEDAY
- ID: 13003152
- Alternate name(s): Pimp,Slenderman
- Location: Right behind you
Re: why is it that larger strike on a smaller defense causes
Whats easier to hit... A million troops storming at you on home turf... Or a couple of 100 thousand troops hiding in ambush as they know their surroundings...
Analogy that was used earlier sometime
Analogy that was used earlier sometime
Pimping
Feb 06, 06:16 Field Marshall Attack defended 15 88,977,968 0 x,x62,635,278,400 900,114 details
| | Hero of the Year | |
Winner: BMMJ13
Feb 06, 06:16 Field Marshall Attack defended 15 88,977,968 0 x,x62,635,278,400 900,114 details
| | Hero of the Year | |
Winner: BMMJ13
-
- Tollan
- Posts: 2769
- Joined: Sun Mar 05, 2006 6:20 am
- Alliance: ~Leaf Village~
- Race: Balancer
- ID: 1907529
- Alternate name(s): TUHD (Bioware forums)
- Location: Stuck between real life and the other end of a Stargate
Re: why is it that larger strike on a smaller defense causes
Jason's explanation hits the spot... mind, it's the defenders' home turf. They know it well. Also, the attackers are the ones that are pressed to storm. Defenders can just lie in wait at strategic points.
Of course, the greater the difference in power the quicker your attacking force can wipe the defenders and thus slightly alter the losses ratio, but it still will be significantly more then the amount of losses a defender suffers.
Of course, the greater the difference in power the quicker your attacking force can wipe the defenders and thus slightly alter the losses ratio, but it still will be significantly more then the amount of losses a defender suffers.
Currently ingame known as BenMS
Goblin: "I like your boots."
Sorcerer: "That's because you don't have any. The emotion is called envy."
Spoiler
/smile at the green grass,
smile at the sun,
smile at the roses,
before they're gone/
BenjaminMS - 'A thief of roses'
smile at the sun,
smile at the roses,
before they're gone/
BenjaminMS - 'A thief of roses'
[TL] Renegadze zegt:
yeah definately makes more sense you hitting
and I have no DMU as you keep robbing it
MERC 1 zegt:
shuld not leave it out
any way you cant prove nothing
[TL] Michael/BenjaminMS zegt:
meh Rene, just find a few 0-def farms with 300+ tril DMU out...
MERC 1 zegt:
cool you two take it then i will hit you
-
- Forum Elite
- Posts: 1863
- Joined: Tue Jul 11, 2006 3:25 am
- Alliance: Tauri Alliance [TATS Leader]
- Race: System Lord
- ID: 21763
- Location: Gettin Jiggy with it.
Re: why is it that larger strike on a smaller defense causes
Loki™ wrote:Juliette wrote:Yes, I like this answer.Biohazard79 wrote:death by Friendly fire?
More people = more guns = more misfires = more accidents = more casualties / fatalities.
How do you explain what happened when I attacked 2t def with 3t strike and lost 56mil attackers? (I had like 150mil trained and forgot to untrain )
Perhaps your army is comprised of Russians. One holds the gun, the other follows. When the man with the gun is shot, the other picks it up and starts firing. Deserters will be shot.
-
Juliette Verified
- The Queen
- Posts: 31802
- Joined: Sun Feb 06, 2005 6:57 pm
- Race: Royalty
- ID: 4323
- Alternate name(s): Cersei Lannister
- Location: Ultima Thule
Re: why is it that larger strike on a smaller defense causes
Genius.Vendetta wrote:Loki™ wrote:Juliette wrote:Yes, I like this answer.Biohazard79 wrote:death by Friendly fire?
More people = more guns = more misfires = more accidents = more casualties / fatalities.
How do you explain what happened when I attacked 2t def with 3t strike and lost 56mil attackers? (I had like 150mil trained and forgot to untrain )
Perhaps your army is comprised of Russians. One holds the gun, the other follows. When the man with the gun is shot, the other picks it up and starts firing. Deserters will be shot.
-
- Forum Addict
- Posts: 3152
- Joined: Sun Sep 23, 2007 12:55 am
- Alliance: TÅTS / TÅF
- Race: Magnificent
- ID: 83588
- Alternate name(s): >> Skype: IrishHighlanders <<
Dublin Warrior, Dubby, Dubs, DW, CGG, DCGG2.
Paul, Paulie Boy!, Paulie, PAULIE!!!, PAULIE BOY!!!, Paul James, etc. - Location: USA
- Contact:
Re: why is it that larger strike on a smaller defense causes
unarmed units drop like flies... even on defense.
unarmed attackers will not even show up in my attack logs.
unarmed attackers will not even show up in my attack logs.
>> Skype: i r i s h h i g h l a n d e r s <<
Tauri Alliance Family Forums:
http://taurialliance.smfforfree2.com/index.php
Dubby's Trade Feedback
Search Dubby's Current Main Forums Account
Search Dubby's Old Main Forums Account
Does the Asgard Hologram Tech Bug Hurt Your Growth as Well?
http://stargatewars.herebegames.com/vie ... 90&start=0
http://stargatewars.herebegames.com/viewonline.php
Tauri Alliance Family Forums:
http://taurialliance.smfforfree2.com/index.php
Dubby's Trade Feedback
Search Dubby's Current Main Forums Account
Search Dubby's Old Main Forums Account
Does the Asgard Hologram Tech Bug Hurt Your Growth as Well?
http://stargatewars.herebegames.com/vie ... 90&start=0
http://stargatewars.herebegames.com/viewonline.php
- Sol
- Forum Addict
- Posts: 3807
- Joined: Sat Apr 11, 2009 9:09 pm
- ID: 0
Re: why is it that larger strike on a smaller defense causes
Juliette wrote:Yes, I like this answer.Biohazard79 wrote:death by Friendly fire?
More people = more guns = more misfires = more accidents = more casualties / fatalities.
Perhaps AJ should add causes of deaths...just for funzies... like x died from friendly fire, y died from MS, z died directly from enemy fire etc.
Field Marshall wrote:Really?Sol wrote:It's not going to destroy your life
I think this is sig worthy in fact.