Page 4 of 4

Re: HAZ for Adminship!!!

Posted: Mon Nov 05, 2012 5:06 pm
by Psyko
Rudy Pena wrote:
Psyko wrote:
Rudy Pena wrote:
Psyko wrote:I think Haz would make an excellent trial lawyer.

and a Great Admin on our wonderful forums. :smt060

I currently disagree with this statement.
Why????

Because of the same thing that would make him an excellent trial lawyer.

He enforces the rules ver batum and doesn't allow a lot of situational interpretation. I think there is a strictness to Haz which would not be beneficial in an Admin position until he loosens up a bit more. There also must be a certain amount of compromise when in a position like Admin where three people must agree to enact change, and so far I do not recall having seen Haz budge from his personal logic and perspective in regards to an issue and/or how something should be handled.

Re: Discussion for/against HAZ

Posted: Mon Nov 05, 2012 5:34 pm
by Rudy Peña
Psyko wrote:
Rudy Pena wrote:
Psyko wrote:
Rudy Pena wrote:
Psyko wrote:I think Haz would make an excellent trial lawyer.

and a Great Admin on our wonderful forums. :smt060

I currently disagree with this statement.
Why????

Because of the same thing that would make him an excellent trial lawyer.

He enforces the rules ver batum and doesn't allow a lot of situational interpretation. I think there is a strictness to Haz which would not be beneficial in an Admin position until he loosens up a bit more. There also must be a certain amount of compromise when in a position like Admin where three people must agree to enact change, and so far I do not recall having seen Haz budge from his personal logic and perspective in regards to an issue and/or how something should be handled.
Haz wrote:For psyko's: I doubt she'd think I'm ready for that. And I'd agree.

Both good points to make.

Thanks.

Re: Discussion for/against HAZ

Posted: Mon Nov 05, 2012 6:01 pm
by Rudy Peña
SuperSaiyan wrote:What happened to this thread?

idk

Re: Discussion for/against HAZ

Posted: Mon Nov 05, 2012 6:21 pm
by Rudy Peña
SuperSaiyan wrote:
Rudy Pena wrote:
SuperSaiyan wrote:What happened to this thread?

idk

It would seem some stuff is missing

oh?? :shock:

Re: Discussion for/against HAZ

Posted: Mon Nov 05, 2012 9:56 pm
by Rudy Peña
SuperSaiyan wrote:
Rudy Pena wrote:
SuperSaiyan wrote:
Rudy Pena wrote:
SuperSaiyan wrote:What happened to this thread?

idk

It would seem some stuff is missing

oh?? :shock:

Well, I could have sworn robert made this thread for starters

Well now that you mention it. It is pretty quite with him banned and not making drama.

Re: Discussion for/against HAZ

Posted: Tue Nov 06, 2012 3:49 am
by Juliette
SuperSaiyan wrote:
Rudy Pena wrote:
SuperSaiyan wrote:
Rudy Pena wrote:
SuperSaiyan wrote:What happened to this thread?

idk

It would seem some stuff is missing

oh?? :shock:

Well, I could have sworn robert made this thread for starters
Thread got split into 5 subthreads. That might be what confused you.. I was glad Haz posted the explanation of ~Odin~'s modding. :D

Subject: vote no for HAZ (actual vote?)
Haz wrote:
R0B3RT wrote:now is to much
mods insulte me nobody warn him :smt078
and odin come and delete all to clean the post ](*,) =D> =D> :smt021 :smt021

this is really a dictature


How many times do I have to say this?

Posts are never deleted. They are moved to the public or private dump (depending on severity of the posts)

All posts within the original "vote no for HAZ" thread are contained within one of the following threads:

viewtopic.php?f=129&t=195454
viewtopic.php?f=129&t=195457
viewtopic.php?f=129&t=195405
viewtopic.php?f=135&t=195456
viewtopic.php?f=135&t=195463

Re: Discussion for/against HAZ

Posted: Tue Nov 06, 2012 4:13 am
by The Doctor
SuperSaiyan wrote:I have quite a problem with that

With what, and why?

Re: Discussion for/against HAZ

Posted: Tue Nov 06, 2012 7:51 am
by Rabbid Thom
Stay on topic please