StarGateWars Forums

minisaiyan wrote:put simply, gm= group of new "section admins"
ombuds= group of new "section admins"
an ombudsperson= particular "section mod"


individuals with the ability to relate to such a change may have understood the implications of the original post, while individual "groups" might require the above statements to make sense of everything.

minisaiyan wrote:i see one or two appeals. ombudsman dicsussions going either off topic or derailing to arguments.

might i reccomend that when a gm/admin is trying to convey a point to a mod as part of trainging or discipline, it be done in a mod forum

might i recommend that when a mod wishes to discuss an appeal with an ombudsperson, it be done by pm

might i reccomend that when an admin wishes to discuss a case with an ombudsperson,, it be done either within a forum for doing so, or pm

basically, as a forum user, the best vision for me, is a case of the following steps
[list=booyah][*]appeal and evidence
[*]ombuds view
[*]superior to appeal against view
[*]ombuds reccomendation
[*]ultimate result/s
[/list]

minisaiyan wrote:i see one or two appeals. Section Admin dicsussions going either off topic or derailing to arguments.

might i reccomend that when a Section Admin is trying to convey a point to a mod as part of trainging or discipline, it be done in a mod forum

might i recommend that when a mod wishes to discuss an appeal with a Section Admin, it be done by pm

might i reccomend that when a Section Admin wishes to discuss a case with a Section Admin, it be done either within a forum for doing so, or pm

basically, as a forum user, the best vision for me, is a case of the following steps
[list=booyah][*]appeal and evidence
[*]Section Admin view (this is the decision)
[*]superior to appeal against view (there is none)
[*]Section Admin reccomendation (there is no such thing, the Section Admin decides, not recommends..)
[*]ultimate result/s (you get those in step 2)
[/list]

Juliette wrote:Now with your replacements:

minisaiyan wrote:i see one or two appeals. Section Admin dicsussions going either off topic or derailing to arguments.

might i reccomend that when a Section Admin is trying to convey a point to a mod as part of trainging or discipline, it be done in a mod forum

might i recommend that when a mod wishes to discuss an appeal with a Section Admin, it be done by pm

might i reccomend that when a Section Admin wishes to discuss a case with a Section Admin, it be done either within a forum for doing so, or pm

basically, as a forum user, the best vision for me, is a case of the following steps
[list=booyah][*]appeal and evidence
[*]Section Admin view (this is the decision)
[*]superior to appeal against view (there is none)
[*]Section Admin reccomendation (there is no such thing, the Section Admin decides, not recommends..)
[*]ultimate result/s (you get those in step 2)
[/list]

minisaiyan wrote:my third line was meant to say section admin over section mod.

so basically you say, that case is put forward, and an admin makes a decision based upon that.
welllll, thats dumb. one persons view vs the "victim's" view and one other is hardly basis for a decision.
surely if a decision is appealed it should not become the mods decision against the admins decision, as a lot of warnings are subject to one's interpretation and therefore 1v1 is stupid if one of those effectively has 2 votes.

if an appeal is made, it should be put to a panel of all(or a select group) of admins to review the situation before a decision is made.

Haz wrote:Perhaps if there is a disagreement with a Section Admins decision on a case, their fellow Section Admins make a decision on it?

Juliette wrote:

Haz wrote:Perhaps if there is a disagreement with a Section Admins decision on a case, their fellow Section Admins make a decision on it?

Isn't that what we said before?

Juliette wrote:There are no more GMs, and there are no Ombudsmen.
Not quite sure what you intended with that, but it looks nice enough for the old system.

fem fatale wrote:

Juliette wrote:There are no more GMs, and there are no Ombudsmen.
Not quite sure what you intended with that, but it looks nice enough for the old system.

if we no longer have ombuspersons, what are Empy and Mathlord now?

fem fatale wrote:

Juliette wrote:There are no more GMs, and there are no Ombudsmen.
Not quite sure what you intended with that, but it looks nice enough for the old system.

if we no longer have ombuspersons, what are Empy and Mathlord now?

Empy wrote:AdminJason asked if we wanted to be regular Section Mods, otherwise we're nothing. I dunno what Mathlord said but I declined.