Re: APP - > LF continuous function
Posted: Wed Oct 16, 2013 6:08 am
Well ascend normal like we did so your **Filtered** won't convert forever
These are the forums for the GateWa.rs family of text-based space-centred PBBGs
https://talk.gatewa.rs/
How small expanse are we talking about here? My minimal ascends on my *ascended drain to 0 in about 6 weeks or so. 8b planets.Caprila wrote:Even ascending 'normally' (i.e minimally) gives you 2-3 months worth of AP a time.
I'll let it convert faster, but I'll decrease the conversion rate.Borek wrote:It's definitely messed up, i did 1 ascension on my new account, got 445m APP's and i'm converting around 700k a day, so i'm looking at something close to 2 years before i get my APP's fully converted and this assumes linear progression.
Once again a good idea completely and utterly messed up by incorrect scaling. It should take 3 months or so IMO for APP's to drain from the latest ascension made, that is enough time, as it stands you are just encouraging people to spend money and buy ascensions via the black market, then spend more buying DMU in cross game trades which is apparently not what you want happening, but somehow cannot avoid encouraging via changes like this...
I am confused by this. You plan to have the conversion happen faster by slowing it down? Or do you mean an increased conversion rate and less LF per APP?Sol wrote:I'll let it convert faster, but I'll decrease the conversion rate.Borek wrote:It's definitely messed up, i did 1 ascension on my new account, got 445m APP's and i'm converting around 700k a day, so i'm looking at something close to 2 years before i get my APP's fully converted and this assumes linear progression.
Once again a good idea completely and utterly messed up by incorrect scaling. It should take 3 months or so IMO for APP's to drain from the latest ascension made, that is enough time, as it stands you are just encouraging people to spend money and buy ascensions via the black market, then spend more buying DMU in cross game trades which is apparently not what you want happening, but somehow cannot avoid encouraging via changes like this...