have you own legal multi in your allience.
Posted: Mon Jun 24, 2013 9:33 pm
is it against the rules to have your own legal multi in your allience?
StarGateWars Forums
These are the forums for the GateWa.rs family of text-based space-centred PBBGs
https://talk.gatewa.rs/
have you own legal multi in your allience.
Page 1 of 1
Re: have you own legal multi in your allience.
Posted: Mon Jun 24, 2013 9:44 pm
Nope...it's generally preferred...makes everything easier
Re: have you own legal multi in your allience.
Posted: Mon Jun 24, 2013 9:45 pm
Mathlord wrote:Nope...it's generally preferred...makes everything easier
Easier how?
Re: have you own legal multi in your allience.
Posted: Mon Jun 24, 2013 10:10 pm
Helps with maintaining treaties, or you get the excitement you see in all the threads posted everywhereslx wrote:Mathlord wrote:Nope...it's generally preferred...makes everything easier
Easier how?
Re: have you own legal multi in your allience.
Posted: Mon Jun 24, 2013 10:17 pm
Had me scared a bit there for a min
That it was gonna go like "so i can mass u easier mwhahahah"
Me and my imagination
That it was gonna go like "so i can mass u easier mwhahahah"
Me and my imagination
Re: have you own legal multi in your allience.
Posted: Mon Jun 24, 2013 11:16 pm
Nah TAF are nice peopleslx wrote:Had me scared a bit there for a min
That it was gonna go like "so i can mass u easier mwhahahah"
Me and my imagination
Unless you insult the Philadelphia Eagles, Phillies, Sixers or Flyers...even though they all probably deserve it >.>
Re: have you own legal multi in your allience.
Posted: Tue Jun 25, 2013 12:24 am
Sounds like a dodgey bunch of teams to me :pMathlord wrote:Nah TAF are nice peopleslx wrote:Had me scared a bit there for a min
That it was gonna go like "so i can mass u easier mwhahahah"
Me and my imagination
Unless you insult the Philadelphia Eagles, Phillies, Sixers or Flyers...even though they all probably deserve it >.>
Re: have you own legal multi in your allience.
Posted: Tue Jun 25, 2013 1:52 am
I don't mind the flyers..~Odin~ #37 wrote:Sounds like a dodgey bunch of teams to me :pMathlord wrote:Nah TAF are nice peopleslx wrote:Had me scared a bit there for a min
That it was gonna go like "so i can mass u easier mwhahahah"
Me and my imagination
Unless you insult the Philadelphia Eagles, Phillies, Sixers or Flyers...even though they all probably deserve it >.>
The rest are meh.
Re: have you own legal multi in your allience.
Posted: Tue Jun 25, 2013 2:11 am
MICHAEL VICK 
Re: have you own legal multi in your allience.
Posted: Tue Jun 25, 2013 10:03 am
slx wrote:Had me scared a bit there for a min
That it was gonna go like "so i can mass u easier mwhahahah"
Me and my imagination
FYI, yes, it probably does that too.
But when the accounts are not in the same alliance,
it makes a lot of trouble for your alliance leaders as well as
your friends, allies, and miscellaneous treaty partners elsewhere in the game.
Re: have you own legal multi in your allience.
Posted: Tue Jun 25, 2013 10:26 am
Don't need to be in the same alliance to be easily recognisable.Dubby_CompGamerGeek2 wrote:FYI, yes, it probably does that too.
But yes, it makes it a hell of a lot easier.
It also adds decent potential for black ops and political intrigue, if done properly.Dubby_CompGamerGeek2 wrote:But when the accounts are not in the same alliance,
it makes a lot of trouble for your alliance leaders as well as
your friends, allies, and miscellaneous treaty partners elsewhere in the game.
As with all things, measure costs vs. benefits.Re: have you own legal multi in your allience.
Posted: Tue Jun 25, 2013 10:39 am
Talk about me Eagles Odin and I'll pluck out your cutesy little bunny whiskers!~Odin~ #37 wrote:Sounds like a dodgey bunch of teams to me :pMathlord wrote:Nah TAF are nice peopleslx wrote:Had me scared a bit there for a min
That it was gonna go like "so i can mass u easier mwhahahah"
Me and my imagination
Unless you insult the Philadelphia Eagles, Phillies, Sixers or Flyers...even though they all probably deserve it >.>
Re: have you own legal multi in your allience.
Posted: Tue Jun 25, 2013 12:29 pm
Mathlord wrote:Nah TAF are nice peopleslx wrote:Had me scared a bit there for a min
That it was gonna go like "so i can mass u easier mwhahahah"
Me and my imagination
Unless you insult the Philadelphia Eagles, Phillies, Sixers or Flyers...even though they all probably deserve it >.>
all those teams suckRe: have you own legal multi in your allience.
Posted: Tue Jun 25, 2013 12:52 pm
Not getting any help from your boy Vick...KSM wrote:Mathlord wrote:Nah TAF are nice peopleslx wrote:Had me scared a bit there for a min
That it was gonna go like "so i can mass u easier mwhahahah"
Me and my imagination
Unless you insult the Philadelphia Eagles, Phillies, Sixers or Flyers...even though they all probably deserve it >.>
Oh and I owe you 5 tril
Re: have you own legal multi in your allience.
Posted: Tue Jun 25, 2013 1:03 pm
Manning, Brady, Brees, etc. all would have failed with that laughing stock of an O-Line in '12. Vick will likely play a bit of a crucial secondary role this year under the new coach.Mathlord wrote:Not getting any help from your boy Vick...KSM wrote:Mathlord wrote:Nah TAF are nice peopleslx wrote:Had me scared a bit there for a min
That it was gonna go like "so i can mass u easier mwhahahah"
Me and my imagination
Unless you insult the Philadelphia Eagles, Phillies, Sixers or Flyers...even though they all probably deserve it >.>
Oh and I owe you 5 tril
And to stay on topic, ho-ho-ho, NG mains are cool in the alliance or outside.