Additional IC Functions *REJECTED*

[Ritalin]

I think the following Functions would be a great asset for alliance comanders.

1, Alliance wide banking. Give a function for alliance commanders to be able to bank everyones naq with one button on alliance management page.
2, A new war setting. Give alliance commanders an additional war setting button that allows all alliance members to have the same relation to one perticular player. example ... "set alliance war/peace/neutral with this player".

[Starfire]

I like both ideas.

[Caprila]

No to alliance banking, imo.

As much as we might like to bank our friends naq, when he drops his ppt, it feels a bit OP.

Would be incredibly powerful both in peace and in war.. 1 person being able to bank for 70 players, means they wouldn't need to log in at all.

As for relations.

Alliance ic's can already mark alliances as hostile/friendly, giving a nice coloured tag to inform their members of current wars/treaties. But that is all it is, information, it doesn't 'enforce' their members not to hit, like a peace/war setting would.

Could be useful I guess, although could lead to some funny adventures.

"Hey, um, I accidentally set us all to war against OA"

"... you.. did .. WHAT !!!! "

[Ritalin]

As for alliance wide banking.... Sometimes people have RL probs and havent got time to log in. this leads to too much naq in the open so attracts farmers, which in turn can cause wars etc. I think it would be a benifit for the whole alliance if this was issued. and as for them not having to log in. it could just be the same as alliance ppt, 4 per week.

The war setting option.. i feel this would be good for training alliances to help thier members build a farm list. instead of "war on alliance members" button that already exists... an additional "Alliance war with this person" button only available to 1IC, 2IC, 3IC. lol and yes it could cause some funny situations but maybe that would be a good thing

[zach obourn]

No to alliance wide banking. This is a war game, no way as nice as it might be.

[Duderanch]

No to both. Definitely.

[Master Rahl]

sorry but I don't like either. Part of being a training alliance is teaching the new players to not have a high naq production, or build a large enough def to cover it. and if you cant you have to accept the possibility of losing it.

As for the second just have them look in alliance attack logs to build a nice farming list. Or teach them how to spot good targets.

You shouldn't have to play the game for them.

[IFLuX]

Could be useful I guess, although could lead to some funny adventures.

"Hey, um, I accidentally set us all to war against OA"

"... you.. did .. WHAT !!!! "

i like that idea

YOU DID WHAT!??!?!? BAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAM

[~Odin~]

Yeah sorry mate I am gonna have to side with the majority on this one, Not a huge fan of both of these idea's. It would indeed make things easier for an alliance leader to be able to bank his members naq with the push of a button...however if all alliance leaders did this farming would suffer a hit.

[Caprila]

01[22:53] <Caprila> Additional IC Functions. 1, alliance wide banking (bank every members naq on click). 2, ability of IC to set alliance peace/neutral/war to individuals.
[22:53] <~Support> 1. Never
[22:53] <~Support> 2. Never
[22:53] <KJ> Alliance wide banking ?
[22:53] <&Paul> ^^^ Neit
[22:53] <KJ> Did TAF suggest that
01[22:53] <Caprila> No, mH's training alliance
[22:53] <~Support> Alliance relations are inter-alliance, not between alliances and persons.