Alliance Log Delays

[Caprila]

This debate has been going on for months, the topics are long and not really going anywhere.

It would be nice imo, to get a better idea of how many players are for/against this.

The poll options :

1 - Yes, 1 minute delay. This is what is currently being tested on dev server.
2 - Yes, another time. This is for those that believe the delays should come in, but it should be more/less than 1 minute. Please make a post stating what you think the delay should be.
3 - No, no change at all. This is for those that do not want any change at all to alliance logs.

The full discussion on Alliance Log Delays can be found here : viewtopic.php?f=13&t=200622

The outcome of this poll, won't dictate whether this update goes to live. But, it should give a better idea of players' feeling on the subject.

Please share the link around (to both this and its sister poll on glory options) to as many people as possible, for the best possible representative.

P.s If you are having difficulty voting use style 'Acidtech Blue' in your profile options.

[IFLuX]

7 votes from TA

i vote for 10 mins delay

[caesar2]

10 minutes, if its counted as separate vote, am good with 1 minute... anything more than 1 minute...

Mods, you should count the option 1 and 2 votes together...

if more for options 1 than 1 minute, if for options 2 than more minutes. But definetly those voting for 1 and 2 are voting for delay.

Thus it should be options 1&2 vs 3

[Loki™]

7 votes from TA

i vote for 10 mins delay

^

[Zod14c]

Voted option 2

Specification: Up until turn change.

[Gandy 181]

agree with c2

and i think atleast 5 min delay

[B L A Z E]

agree with c2

and i think atleast 5 min delay

This.

[~Tziki~]

Additional Suggestion to delays:

Allow a 1 minutes delay, UNLESS, a player has been logged in and refreshed a page in the last 5 minutes

Therefore those that are active and online (possibly undergoing an onliner) can have alliance members view their logs and aid them (lets say a 3v2 fight or something)

However those that are offline stay at the 1 minute log update time. (slightly penalised for not being active/online. (They shouldnt be allowed to have someone else do their job for them entirely if not active enough to do it themselves {one person effectively playing 50 accounts...})

[Caprila]

10 minutes, if its counted as separate vote, am good with 1 minute... anything more than 1 minute...

Mods, you should count the option 1 and 2 votes together...

if more for options 1 than 1 minute, if for options 2 than more minutes. But definetly those voting for 1 and 2 are voting for delay.

Thus it should be options 1&2 vs 3

As intended C2.

That's always the problem with polls, limiting options, but still allowing fair use of opinion.

Consider, given current votes ( 15 for, 11 against ) you can somewhat loosely say, more people want a delay, than don't.

Perhaps, the discussion can then move on to how much delay, how it works, what it entails, and testing out said delay..

Rather than a continuous cycle of discussions on should we even have a delay.

==> Moving the discussion into a more useful and constructive direction is what I'm hoping for.

[reborn]

Till the next turn change imo, so if u start at the beginning of one turn over u got 30 mins of mass time before it shows.

Or if u start with only 10 mins before turn over u got only 10 mins.

[dastupy]

I also agree with a 5-10 min delay

[~LordRse~]

BIG NO

[Richard B Riddick]

i like the delay till TC tbh

though 5 to 10 min delay also sounds good to me

[Duderanch]

TC sounds good.

[Antz]

at least 5 minutes, though would prefer more I guess.