Calculator's
Posted: Wed Aug 26, 2015 8:35 am
Is there any Calcutators out there that work for SGW... Looking for one that I can use for raw up, Planet increases, and sab
Any help guys and gals??![[021.gif] :smt021](./images/smilies/021.gif)
Any help guys and gals??
These are the forums for the GateWa.rs family of text-based space-centred PBBGs
https://talk.gatewa.rs/
Also it would have been nice to get a Thank you... i literally just finished making it for YOU when the verbal attacks started.. not so much as a thanks!!~Odin~ wrote:Indeed anyone is welcome to use The Collective's gatewars Calculator as it is currently public. We hope that it might help some of you that may not already have one.
You were paid in trade (given a hosted forum) for the details needed for the calculator so no thank you was needed. Then you went and abused the permissions you had within the calculator for any future updates by posting spam and adding spam images and overall acting like a child because of said "attacks". So no you don't get any thank you, it is property of The Collective and as I said the calculator is currently public and we hope that it may help some members of the game that do not currently have access to any others.Method Man wrote:Also it would have been nice to get a Thank you... i literally just finished making it for YOU when the verbal attacks started.. not so much as a thanks!!~Odin~ wrote:Indeed anyone is welcome to use The Collective's gatewars Calculator as it is currently public. We hope that it might help some of you that may not already have one.
Do you still have the old calc that was on your forums?~Odin~ wrote:Indeed anyone is welcome to use The Collective's gatewars Calculator as it is currently public. We hope that it might help some of you that may not already have one.
I just trying for some updated info so I could fix the old lego calc, got most parts, just need a little more and its all done.harchester wrote:Judgement has a great one
Clockwork wrote:What are you trying to fix?
The look is 1 partSupport wrote:The "old"-ness of the look, I'd imagine given the emphasis on 'old'.Clockwork wrote:What are you trying to fix?