Page 1 of 2
being able to set the number of soldiers attacking
Posted: Sun Mar 05, 2006 4:19 am
by urogard
since so many people say attacking is not worth it, mostly because of the high repair bills, i would suggest being able to set the number of soldiers on an attack mission, just as you can do it with spies. I think this would be a greatly appreciated suggestion, what do you think?
Posted: Sun Mar 05, 2006 4:22 am
by Wolf359
The point is though that you would still have to use most if not all of your troops in the attack in order to break somebody's defence that has enough naq to make the attack worthwhile - so it won't really make a difference.
Posted: Sun Mar 05, 2006 5:22 am
by Ryushinaka
ahhh but Wolf359, on the smaller targets it would be more efficient not to use your entire attack force. less repair bill and all potentially. However, if this feature were implemented it would show more flaws possibly in the attack formula (not saying that there are any currently!). So its probably best not to implement the suggested feature IMO as the game currently is.
Posted: Sun Mar 05, 2006 5:46 am
by TheSoulHarvester
NO! want a high atk, pay the price, want the lower atk, again, You pay the price...
Posted: Sun Mar 05, 2006 5:48 am
by ~Phoenix~
Walhalla wrote:NO! want a high atk, pay the price, want the lower atk, again, You pay the price...
How un-wise.
You wouldn't send a bazooka at a fly. If you had bug spray.
Posted: Sun Mar 05, 2006 5:54 am
by Wolf359
Ryushinaka wrote:ahhh but Wolf359, on the smaller targets it would be more efficient not to use your entire attack force. less repair bill and all potentially. However, if this feature were implemented it would show more flaws possibly in the attack formula (not saying that there are any currently!). So its probably best not to implement the suggested feature IMO as the game currently is.
Unless you were massing them, why would you attack a significantly smaller army (i.e. very weak defence)?..........
.............. you are usually attacking for naq and you usually need a high attack to get past the high defence to get the naq, as low defences usually do not have aenough naq to make an atatck worthwhile.
If you are massing - then that is the price for massing.
Swings and roundabouts really,
Posted: Sun Mar 05, 2006 6:18 am
by urogard
why not then make a limitation of 1 attack on a person per day with the number of soldiers you really WANT to attack.
Posted: Sun Mar 05, 2006 9:04 am
by [SGC_ReplicÅtors]
Walhalla wrote:NO! want a high atk, pay the price, want the lower atk, again, You pay the price...
lol
Posted: Sun Mar 05, 2006 9:19 am
by TheSoulHarvester
[U5][SGC_ReplicÅtors] wrote:Walhalla wrote:NO! want a high atk, pay the price, want the lower atk, again, You pay the price...
lol
lol what, this way its fair imho... why should You build a powerful atk just to get rank and use 1 wep for farming... nonono! not good, not good...
Posted: Sun Mar 05, 2006 9:38 am
by Artiglio
halamala wrote:why not then make a limitation of 1 attack on a person per day with the number of soldiers you really WANT to attack.

huh?
Posted: Sun Mar 05, 2006 1:27 pm
by urogard
Årtiglio wrote:halamala wrote:why not then make a limitation of 1 attack on a person per day with the number of soldiers you really WANT to attack.

huh?
you will be able to perform only 1 attack in 1 day one a user with the army size you wish, all further attacks will result in full scale attack
Re: being able to set the number of soldiers attacking
Posted: Mon Mar 06, 2006 2:03 am
by three
halamala wrote:since so many people say attacking is not worth it, mostly because of the high repair bills, i would suggest being able to set the number of soldiers on an attack mission, just as you can do it with spies. I think this would be a greatly appreciated suggestion, what do you think?
YES i think that is right / cost to much to repair / i now only attack for 1 bil or more / other wise its not worth it / just build up the f//ken miners and wait for 30 mins to come around/
come on admin dude change the f//kn rule man for f sake and see more
action lol more fun / ball breakers lol
the 3
Posted: Mon Mar 06, 2006 3:56 am
by urogard
thank you three

Re: being able to set the number of soldiers attacking
Posted: Mon Mar 06, 2006 4:35 am
by Wolf359
three wrote:halamala wrote:since so many people say attacking is not worth it, mostly because of the high repair bills, i would suggest being able to set the number of soldiers on an attack mission, just as you can do it with spies. I think this would be a greatly appreciated suggestion, what do you think?
YES i think that is right / cost to much to repair / i now only attack for 1 bil or more / other wise its not worth it / just build up the f//ken miners and wait for 30 mins to come around/
come on admin dude change the f//kn rule man for f sake and see more
action lol more fun / ball breakers lol
the 3
Swearing on the Gate Wars Forum:
https://talk.gatewa.rs/viewtopic.php?t=21017
Posted: Mon Mar 06, 2006 4:44 am
by Bazsy
Not a good idea...
-It strengthen the strong players, they could attack farms with less repair...
-And puting the number of soldiers each time when someone attacks maker the farming slower...
I dont like it....