Page 1 of 2
To have Raid option or not??
Posted: Sat May 07, 2005 8:05 am
by Lord Dougy
well there are so many opinions flying about, i think its time to choose whether to keep it or not.
Posted: Sat May 07, 2005 8:30 am
by IcER
The raiding is good, just needs a little adjustment. It *could* be moved to covert, but maybe it should just be tweaked. Cant get everything right first time.
Posted: Sat May 07, 2005 9:39 am
by Wolf359
Must disagree - I am usually a big fan of Forum's work, but this RAID update is absolutely ridiculous!
It unbalances the races and upsets all the hard work that has been put in to balance them.
Sorry Forum, but I've been going through the forum boards all day, and the majority of opinion is that this one is a bit of a stinker!!
I say scrap the RAID option altogether!
Posted: Sat May 07, 2005 9:40 am
by Saturnine
IcER wrote:The raiding is good, just needs a little adjustment. It *could* be moved to covert, but maybe it should just be tweaked. Cant get everything right first time.
Yeah, Like the ability to steal more units! What I'm getting aint worth 15 turns. Covert turns, now I could throw those away and be happy.
Posted: Sat May 07, 2005 9:53 am
by Wolf359
lord saturnine wrote:IcER wrote:The raiding is good, just needs a little adjustment. It *could* be moved to covert, but maybe it should just be tweaked. Cant get everything right first time.
Yeah, Like the ability to steal more units! What I'm getting aint worth 15 turns. Covert turns, now I could throw those away and be happy.
I agree that covert would probably be a better place for it if it does stay (although I hope it doesn't!) as it would also mean that RAID attacks would be more limited as cuvert turns a limited to a maximum of 50.
Posted: Sat May 07, 2005 10:10 am
by Lindstorm
Posted: Sat May 07, 2005 10:23 am
by I Replicate
*wishes I had mod powers in this board to remove insults*
Okay, first of all, yelling and talking like the will not change anything
Second, I am sure that Forum is considering changing it, or at least giving us some information about it and a reason why he made it this way. Either way, just wait a little bit for an answer.
Also, this really doesnt advantage the top players too much since there is the rank modifyer interferring with them taking too many units.
~I Replicate
asking everyone to chill out
Posted: Sat May 07, 2005 10:25 am
by Brigon
turns spent raiding means turns not spent attacking
it is far more profitable to attack then to raid
and as one of my high school english teachers used to say
"cursing is a sign of a poverty striken mind."
Posted: Sat May 07, 2005 10:31 am
by Lindstorm
I Replicate wrote:*wishes I had mod powers in this board to remove insults*
Okay, first of all, yelling and talking like the will not change anything
Second, I am sure that Forum is considering changing it, or at least giving us some information about it and a reason why he made it this way. Either way, just wait a little bit for an answer.
Also, this really doesnt advantage the top players too much since there is the rank modifyer interferring with them taking too many units.
~Jaxin
asking everyone to chill out
Oh you say they won't steal to many units. hmmm yeah you're wrong!! One of my friend you may see his name before forgive_me, lost 4k of untraind soldiers to someone in top 10 (he didn't tll who) and he was ranked below 3000 .
Posted: Sat May 07, 2005 10:34 am
by Brigon
forgive me didnt belong at that low of a rank
Posted: Sat May 07, 2005 10:36 am
by I Replicate
Forgive me was ranked in the 1400s AFTER the attacks against him. He was no where near the 3000s.
Posted: Sat May 07, 2005 10:38 am
by Lindstorm
brigon wrote:*turns spent raiding means turns not spent attacking
it is far more profitable to attack then to raid
and as one of my high school english teachers used to say
"cursing is a sign of a poverty striken mind."
Firs I hate all teachers so i don't raly care what would they say, again I apoligize for the insaults I deleted them all I think. And as you have said attacking is more profitable yes it is if you are looking short turn. With 15 attack turns you will steal abaut 1.7 million naq. But 4k untraid units will gave that money in abaut two wiks and from then on you will have much more profit from them than the naq that you have stolen before

Posted: Sat May 07, 2005 10:38 am
by Brigon
like i said he didnt belong that low...
its nice how people give the updates a chance thou dont you think
yes but im guessing it took alot more then 15 attack turns to get 4k troops
the best i got was 49 with 15
Posted: Sat May 07, 2005 10:49 am
by C Carter
Lindstorm wrote:I Replicate wrote:*wishes I had mod powers in this board to remove insults*
Okay, first of all, yelling and talking like the will not change anything
Second, I am sure that Forum is considering changing it, or at least giving us some information about it and a reason why he made it this way. Either way, just wait a little bit for an answer.
Also, this really doesnt advantage the top players too much since there is the rank modifyer interferring with them taking too many units.
~Jaxin
asking everyone to chill out
Oh you say they won't steal to many units. hmmm yeah you're wrong!! One of my friend you may see his name before forgive_me, lost 4k of untraind soldiers to someone in top 10 (he didn't tll who) and he was ranked below 3000 .
i kno forgive me to he was rank around 1.500 he did lose 4k units but they attacked him 10 times sense he has one of the most amount of units but....im not saying any more
Posted: Sat May 07, 2005 10:55 am
by Lindstorm
Forgive_me wrote:*i think its the bigest **** it coud hapen....im rank 3000 and i wass attack by rank 6 and lost 4k units...so **** this game...good luck all...
I cleared out the language but those were his words.
But I must say that i didn't look at his rank so I apoligize again if I spread wrong information but still I don't like this raid think atleast not under the attack turns.
