Mercenaries
Posted: Thu May 25, 2006 9:23 am
How effective are mercenaries compared to normal and supers i was looking and seeing if it was more cost effective having merc rather than trained soldiers
StarGateWars Forums
These are the forums for the GateWa.rs family of text-based space-centred PBBGs
https://talk.gatewa.rs/
Mercenaries
Page 1 of 1
Posted: Thu May 25, 2006 9:27 am
Mercs are the same as normal trained soldiers as far as strength. Supers are a lot better of course. Mercs are great fodder though. I like using them for strike so I won't lose many UU. That way I can leave them trained as miners or covert and just buy cheap mercs to replace the ones that die.
Posted: Thu May 25, 2006 9:28 am
you read my mind
Posted: Thu May 25, 2006 11:51 am
SS are more cost effective.
150% more expensive:
But...
200% more powerfull.
50% less likely to die.
150% more expensive:
But...
200% more powerfull.
50% less likely to die.
Posted: Thu May 25, 2006 7:06 pm
i would reccomend training supers too...mercs kinda suck ^_^
Posted: Thu May 25, 2006 9:27 pm
For all serious purposes I use super soldiers. Not following Jix's math though.
merc = 3k naq
ss = 350k naq (BM value)
+ 2k naq +89k naq (training) => 441k naq total... (or 391k at saner
prices)
per this thinking I can lose 147 merc per super and still break even.
What am I missing here?
Freestyle304
merc = 3k naq
ss = 350k naq (BM value)
+ 2k naq +89k naq (training) => 441k naq total... (or 391k at saner
prices)
per this thinking I can lose 147 merc per super and still break even.
What am I missing here?
Freestyle304
Posted: Fri May 26, 2006 3:51 am
my mathFreestyle304 wrote:For all serious purposes I use super soldiers. Not following Jix's math though.
merc = 3k naq
ss = 350k naq (BM value)
+ 2k naq +89k naq (training) => 441k naq total... (or 391k at saner
prices)
per this thinking I can lose 147 merc per super and still break even.
What am I missing here?
Freestyle304
