Page 1 of 1

g and r range decrease???

Posted: Thu Oct 05, 2006 8:05 am
by Balladbird
The top 115 players used to get 5 g and r a turn, now its only the top 100. How come if the ranks for 1 g and r a turn are getting moved up to 1,200, the ranks for 5 g and r a turn are getting scaled down?

Posted: Thu Oct 05, 2006 8:33 am
by vn70072
I believe the percents have remained the same, it's just that a bunch of inactives were deleted so the brackets shifted. And shouldn't this be in the newby/faq section?

Posted: Thu Oct 05, 2006 8:34 am
by Balladbird
vn70072 wrote:I believe the percents have remained the same, it's just that a bunch of inactives were deleted so the brackets shifted. And shouldn't this be in the newby/faq section?


G and R questions dont concern n00bs :)

Posted: Thu Oct 05, 2006 8:45 am
by RB Ian
I remember the exact time admin removed the inactive accounts too *was ranked 108 at the time*

Posted: Thu Oct 05, 2006 8:48 am
by Teal'auc of the Void
I noticed that too, when I was sitting in 102... was getting 5 g/r points per turn.. and then like few turns later I noticed i gained 1 for like three turns before I noticed and raised my rank...Seems some inactives got deleted. Less raiding farms, geeeeez... :P



Teal'auc

Posted: Thu Oct 05, 2006 8:57 am
by Cole
W000000000000000t for the 1.1k army/22k naq accounts deleted :D 8) ...but not for G&R ranks :(

Posted: Thu Oct 05, 2006 9:15 am
by Don Lewis
This does belong in the FAQ section, and yes, the total players is now round 50k i believe.

Posted: Thu Oct 05, 2006 10:06 am
by Lore
No more free lunches!!!!!!! :twisted:

Posted: Thu Oct 05, 2006 2:04 pm
by Angelus Errare
no wonder i wasn't getting G&R at 1069. the rank must have been set higher.

Posted: Thu Oct 05, 2006 2:46 pm
by raistlin majere
the rank was not "set". Inactive accounts were cleared, thus changing the rank needed, while not changing the %age.

Posted: Thu Oct 05, 2006 3:08 pm
by Angelus Errare
Raistlin Majere wrote:the rank was not "set". Inactive accounts were cleared, thus changing the rank needed, while not changing the %age.


that's what i meant :oops: