Would you send someone into battle weaponless???
-
- Forum Grunt
- Posts: 97
- Joined: Mon Mar 21, 2005 9:11 am
Would you send someone into battle weaponless???
I have enough NID agents to cover how many weapons I have. I also have Mercs in case any of my officers need them. Problem is, even though I have enough NID to carry all the weapons I have, my mercs are still going into battle & dying. Could we please have this changed so that no un-armed people go into battle.
-
- Forum Addict
- Posts: 3949
- Joined: Sun Mar 13, 2005 4:57 pm
- ID: 0
-
- Merriest Mod in the West
- Posts: 2340
- Joined: Tue Feb 15, 2005 11:16 pm
- ID: 0
- Location: Off-world
-
Honours and Awards
WW2 - Russians. Try playing the Russian level of Call of Duty, you'll get a nice feel of what it's like. And have fun in the process cause that's one of the coolest parts of the game.
As soon as you build an idiot proof system, somebody else builds a better idiot.
If it moves, kill it. If it doesn't move, kick it until it does move, and then kill it.
-
- Forum Grunt
- Posts: 97
- Joined: Mon Mar 21, 2005 9:11 am
- Psi Kiya Trist
- The Timeless One
- Posts: 7416
- Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2005 4:56 pm
- ID: 4266
- Location: Searching for my life in the real world
- Contact:
-
Honours and Awards
xcrunnermr06 wrote:Sense a mod posted on here, could you possibly get forum to do something about this?
read what he said:
Sleipnir wrote:WW2 - Russians. Try playing the Russian level of Call of Duty, you'll get a nice feel of what it's like. And have fun in the process cause that's one of the coolest parts of the game.
the mod is against adding this feature, as am i.
you trained them or recruited them to fight, not to be sent to your officers.
and they fulfill this purpose, whither you want them to do their job or not.
~_+Psi Kiya Trist+_~
buck wrote:well psi, upkeeping order in the universe does play its tricks on your mind...
- buck
- The Main Event
- Posts: 9809
- Joined: Wed May 18, 2005 7:56 am
- Race: Degenerate
- ID: 16843
- Location: Between and Devil and the Ace of spades
-
Honours and Awards
hmmm...well its always good to have weaponless in defence to fil in the gaps if your away.
Spoiler
2006 -
Poster of the Year
2007 -
Runner up signature of the Year
Runner up most improved player of the Year
Runner up hero of the Year
Alliance war of the year (CIA vs COP)
2008-
Hall of Fame
2009-
Runner up Hero of the Year
2010-
Vendetta of the Year (Buck vs Tekki)
Runner up Vendetta of the Year (Buck vs Darthudd)
Noteworthy alliances-
Omega
Mayhem
Radical Minority
Nemesis Sect
Warlords of Briton
Previous affiliations-
TL
Ricos
DDE
The Tok'ra
The OOC
The SLA
Missed and dear friends -
Too Many to count, but never forgotten.
Code:
Poster of the Year
2007 -
Runner up signature of the Year
Runner up most improved player of the Year
Runner up hero of the Year
Alliance war of the year (CIA vs COP)
2008-
Hall of Fame
2009-
Runner up Hero of the Year
2010-
Vendetta of the Year (Buck vs Tekki)
Runner up Vendetta of the Year (Buck vs Darthudd)
Noteworthy alliances-
Omega
Mayhem
Radical Minority
Nemesis Sect
Warlords of Briton
Previous affiliations-
TL
Ricos
DDE
The Tok'ra
The OOC
The SLA
Missed and dear friends -
Too Many to count, but never forgotten.
Code:
-
- Forum Addict
- Posts: 4158
- Joined: Wed Apr 20, 2005 9:29 am
- Alliance: Loner :P
- Race: NanoTiMaster
- ID: 1908448
Sleipnir wrote:WW2 - Russians. Try playing the Russian level of Call of Duty, you'll get a nice feel of what it's like. And have fun in the process cause that's one of the coolest parts of the game.
LOL. I love that level. One of you gets the gun and the other gets the ammo.....bit annoying that you can't pick stuff up off the dying guys around you though.
You train em....you kill em. If you don't want extra to die theres a simple solution. Don't get extra.
-
- Revolution of the Mods
- Posts: 570
- Joined: Fri Feb 11, 2005 1:30 pm
-
Honours and Awards
-
- Forum Grunt
- Posts: 97
- Joined: Mon Mar 21, 2005 9:11 am
Jean Gregoire Gabriel wrote:Yep the problem here are your tactics, not the game. If you don't want to send in units unarmed, either arm them or untrain them - getting the game to do things for you just makes it duller for everyone.
J.G.G.
Take a look at the Poles... Apairently I'm not the only one who thinks this.
-
- Forum Addict
- Posts: 3949
- Joined: Sun Mar 13, 2005 4:57 pm
- ID: 0
-
- Revolution of the Mods
- Posts: 570
- Joined: Fri Feb 11, 2005 1:30 pm
-
Honours and Awards
xcrunnermr06 wrote:Jean Gregoire Gabriel wrote:Yep the problem here are your tactics, not the game. If you don't want to send in units unarmed, either arm them or untrain them - getting the game to do things for you just makes it duller for everyone.
J.G.G.
Take a look at the Poles... Apairently I'm not the only one who thinks this.
It doesn't matter. There is a solution to your problem via change of tactics, not game code.
J.G.G.
Revolutionary
-
- Forum Grunt
- Posts: 97
- Joined: Mon Mar 21, 2005 9:11 am
I don't know if it's my tactics that need changed... Think of the government... They have millions of people at their expense... that doesn't mean that they send all of them into battle. I agree that it makes my tactics better... but right now more then twice the people that have taken a look at this have wanted the change, and it's more realistic. You don't hire just the poeple you need in war, you get extra and when a hole needs filed (you officers) you have extra to fill it in with. It just doesn't make sense
-
- Revolution of the Mods
- Posts: 570
- Joined: Fri Feb 11, 2005 1:30 pm
-
Honours and Awards
xcrunnermr06 wrote:I don't know if it's my tactics that need changed... Think of the government... They have millions of people at their expense... that doesn't mean that they send all of them into battle. I agree that it makes my tactics better...
This won't be changed, the system works fine. Currently it stops people hoarding troops and mercs, knowing that as long as they have fewer weapons than troops, their troops are safe.
xcrunnermr06 wrote:right now more then twice the people that have taken a look at this have wanted the change...
How many people would like this game to play itself for them? How many people supported having the attack pages automatically searching for ripe targets? How many people wanted automatic banking for their naquadah? How many people are just lazy?
xcrunnermr06 wrote:...and it's more realistic.
...
xcrunnermr06 wrote:You don't hire just the poeple you need in war, you get extra and when a hole needs filed (you officers) you have extra to fill it in with. It just doesn't make sense
If you want to look at your analogy again, perhaps you should consider training your troops (in-game) as putting them on the frontline. If you don't want your troops to die, don't put them in the faces of the damn enemy. When your frontline troops are depleted, 'fill in the hole' by training more/sending more to the frontline.
Regardless of whether you like my new view on the system, this is not a good idea to be implemented.
J.G.G.
a mighty fine post
Revolutionary