Dedicated naq Miners.

User avatar
invader bissell
Forum Newbie
Posts: 49
Joined: Mon Aug 15, 2005 5:23 pm
Race: Zombie
ID: 25987

Dedicated naq Miners.

I think that there needs to be a possible unit upgrade, from General drone to General Clone, or Peon to Super Peon. Whatever the unit, the purpose would be only mining naq, so you couldn't train them into defensive or offensive unites with out reassigning them first. Possibly double the naq production of each unit, by training the general unit into a dedicated "miner".
Just an Idea
Darth CRÅYSHACK_Toe9292
Forum Spammer
Posts: 573
Joined: Wed Jun 29, 2005 12:06 pm
ID: 0
Location: Spamming from my Mothership, the Lusankya!!!!!!!!!!
Contact:

That's a great idea and I support you 100%.
(\_/)
(0.0)
(><)This is Bunny Copy him, this message in your sig to help to world Domination
Image
Image
User avatar
invader bissell
Forum Newbie
Posts: 49
Joined: Mon Aug 15, 2005 5:23 pm
Race: Zombie
ID: 25987

Thank you, I hope everyone else agrees.

And penguins ROCK!
Darth CRÅYSHACK_Toe9292
Forum Spammer
Posts: 573
Joined: Wed Jun 29, 2005 12:06 pm
ID: 0
Location: Spamming from my Mothership, the Lusankya!!!!!!!!!!
Contact:

blackdeath wrote:And penguins ROCK!


Just ignor that part of my signature.
(\_/)
(0.0)
(><)This is Bunny Copy him, this message in your sig to help to world Domination
Image
Image
Narrator
Forum Irregular
Posts: 276
Joined: Sun May 22, 2005 2:54 am

yea it seems like a good idea... wat do u think the numbers would be? like 100k per unit then double naq per turn?
-ven
Darth CRÅYSHACK_Toe9292
Forum Spammer
Posts: 573
Joined: Wed Jun 29, 2005 12:06 pm
ID: 0
Location: Spamming from my Mothership, the Lusankya!!!!!!!!!!
Contact:

It would be like training a normal unit, seriusly howmuch training do you need to mine naq, it would cost between 2k and 3.5k.
(\_/)
(0.0)
(><)This is Bunny Copy him, this message in your sig to help to world Domination
Image
Image
[SGC_ReplicÅtors]
Forum Addict
Posts: 3949
Joined: Sun Mar 13, 2005 4:57 pm
ID: 0

or we can ask Forum for a naqda boost per unit like he did in the past to speed up gameplay


if the super miners are upgrades they should be allowed to be killed in COmbat
User avatar
Lørd Søbek
Forum Irregular
Posts: 421
Joined: Sun May 29, 2005 5:19 pm
ID: 0
Location: Ruling over my ascended realm of Åristøn

but only combat that is inflicted on ur realm, ie, u atk someone u loose supers and mercs. Someone atks u, u loose supers, mercs, and miners. Because miners would have no place going into battle, however they would be causualties in combat against ur realm
Image
Darth CRÅYSHACK_Toe9292
Forum Spammer
Posts: 573
Joined: Wed Jun 29, 2005 12:06 pm
ID: 0
Location: Spamming from my Mothership, the Lusankya!!!!!!!!!!
Contact:

It would be a seperate tally and only if you lose because they would be behind the lines.
(\_/)
(0.0)
(><)This is Bunny Copy him, this message in your sig to help to world Domination
Image
Image
Mossm

Thoughts

My three cents:

I don't think it should be a full doubling, but rather a 50% increase.

Upgrade should be 50k+, and irreversable, or at least a fair degree of cost to be reversed.

(if not irreversable/otherwise, I think it'd become a bit to much of an exploit, especially if the upgrade made too cheap).

That's just my opinion though. Cost could be associated with various different items: Cost to purchase mining gear, genetic enhancements to deal with extremes in lower tunnels, training on how to use a pick.
Darth CRÅYSHACK_Toe9292
Forum Spammer
Posts: 573
Joined: Wed Jun 29, 2005 12:06 pm
ID: 0
Location: Spamming from my Mothership, the Lusankya!!!!!!!!!!
Contact:

How about techs and tools to help the units that have been made miners.
(\_/)
(0.0)
(><)This is Bunny Copy him, this message in your sig to help to world Domination
Image
Image
Chris M
Forum Expert
Posts: 1366
Joined: Tue Apr 19, 2005 1:06 pm
Race: System Lord
ID: 13122
Location: England

if this proposal is approved, it shud be limited to the army size, like mercs have (sort of).

otherwise, the gap between high players and low would increase ALOT!

and if your realm is attacked, you lose a random amount of miners, as lord sokek said is something i agree with.

this suggestion has promise IMHO!
User avatar
Ålbel The Wicked
Forum Spammer
Posts: 358
Joined: Wed May 25, 2005 11:46 am
Race: Elicoorian
ID: 1982073
Alternate name(s): Current:
Albel Noxx (1982073)
Old Account:
Ålbel The Wicked (18101)
Location: Canada

Definitly a great idea...Maybe doing something to make them harder to train instead of making them casualties though...
()xxx[::: Ålbel The Wicked :::]xxx()
Image
Image
Chris M
Forum Expert
Posts: 1366
Joined: Tue Apr 19, 2005 1:06 pm
Race: System Lord
ID: 13122
Location: England

Shadow Blade wrote:Definitly a great idea...Maybe doing something to make them harder to train instead of making them casualties though...

why?
its a good option but i prefer the losses through attack approach.

mass attacks wud adversely affect income... THIS IS STARGATE WARS AFTERALL :twisted: LOL

ive never massed b4 for the record...
User avatar
Ålbel The Wicked
Forum Spammer
Posts: 358
Joined: Wed May 25, 2005 11:46 am
Race: Elicoorian
ID: 1982073
Alternate name(s): Current:
Albel Noxx (1982073)
Old Account:
Ålbel The Wicked (18101)
Location: Canada

Well hey...I guess as long as there not a casualty if you attack some1...Meh...But I like never attack...Make them so they would not become casualties as much as Ofensive and Supers...Thats fine with me then...
()xxx[::: Ålbel The Wicked :::]xxx()
Image
Image
Locked

Return to “Suggestions Archive”