Page 1 of 1

Terms Of Surrender Treaties

Posted: Tue Feb 27, 2007 11:45 pm
by Big Brother
As the Ancient Brethren thread has stirred up many ppl as regards old treaties, I suggest that in future all treaties be posted in full and Leaders post to say yes both sides agree then that thread be locked.

will save a lot of he said/ she said, it was this alliance/that alliance.

Posted: Tue Feb 27, 2007 11:48 pm
by *~Starry~*
the poing of posting something is to let the community know and discuss it...

If they wish to just verify it with themselve, then they may do that in private..



~starry

Posted: Wed Feb 28, 2007 8:49 am
by Big Brother
i am not saying ppl could not discuss treaty, but that they make a seperate thread to do so, so that Treaty remains intact with out spam/ flaming. And can be refered back to by anyone anytime.

Currently there seems to be some confusion over which treaty Robe is bound by (CF or TF)and to whom (GA, CoPs, Omega).

If there was a seperate place were treaties were hold so to speak, where no-one could alter once they were locked. Then perhaps there would be less mayhem on forum.

Posted: Wed Feb 28, 2007 9:28 am
by ~Zekk~
This forum is an open and unbiased(usually) community, alliances can build public sections for treaty details if they wish, but doing so on this forum would be a waste of space(honestly, MAYBE a handfull will actually read it) and will most likely never happen.



~Syreck