Page 1 of 8
CIA: What should be changed?
Posted: Fri Mar 09, 2007 1:22 pm
by Alabrax
I keep seeing people talk about how cowardly and weak CIA is. However, I've yet to see one recommendation on exactly what CIA could do better. So I'd like for people to sound off on what they would change about CIA.
This is for a civilized discussion. I don't want to see spamming or flaming just because someone points out a flaw in reasoning.
*disclaimer* this thread by no means indicates that we are even considering changing our current policies. This is for my own personal attempt at trying to understand the sgw community.
Posted: Fri Mar 09, 2007 1:26 pm
by Tivadar
CIA shouldn´t copy the exact threads of CoP
Posted: Fri Mar 09, 2007 1:34 pm
by Alabrax
Hellsing wrote:CIA shouldn´t copy the exact threads of CoP
I wanted there to be parity. However unlike the other post, I honestly want to know what CoP would suggest. I mean they are the best, who better to listen to?
Posted: Fri Mar 09, 2007 1:37 pm
by SSG EnterTheLion
1. Top player/s shouldn't ascend and run away when they could have done damage, leaving the weaker members to carry the burden.
2. Alliances that have been battered so thoroughly should surrender or they just might end up like the SLA. I point to alliances like the Foundation and NAOS here.
3. Stop collaborating with 'dodgy' ppl. lol
4. Stop acting cocky. The lot of you are getting ur behinds pasted. And unlike us, most of you will come out of this war worse off. The CoP are just hitting targets at random, at whim. Once we actually organise, run for the hills.
5. Stop coming on here posting your sad sob stories like 'EtL, I didn't know we were going to war, honest!" when you lot had a nice chunk in the bank...and still getting ur behinds pasted.
6. Hope this is the last thread that looks for motivations on both sides, cos ur bloody spamming my forum! lmao
Posted: Fri Mar 09, 2007 1:43 pm
by Alabrax
Thank you.
I was with you up until #6, which at that point you (maybe jokingly) made an arrogant remark, calling this your forum. I honestly thought I was going to get a serious reply up until I read that last one...
Thank you again.
Posted: Fri Mar 09, 2007 1:45 pm
by Alabrax
Oh and to address #3... I don't know who else we would have to work with. Any suggestions?
Posted: Fri Mar 09, 2007 1:51 pm
by Neimenljivi
SSG EnterTheLion wrote:4. Once we actually organise, run for the hills.
About 2 weeks of war and u still haven't organised 
And why should we, "smaller" alliances leave? I am hoping that suggestion #2 wasn't aimed at SC because we're doing "quite" good job
~N
Posted: Fri Mar 09, 2007 1:54 pm
by SSG EnterTheLion
Alabrax wrote:Oh and to address #3... I don't know who else we would have to work with. Any suggestions?
not cheats, or ppl who exploit of course!
Posted: Fri Mar 09, 2007 1:57 pm
by [DDE] Bastion
Change the name... its kinda... cheesy
oh, and agreed with everything with Rhett... until #6 of course... because the forum is mine, not yours
Posted: Fri Mar 09, 2007 1:58 pm
by Alabrax
SSG EnterTheLion wrote:Alabrax wrote:Oh and to address #3... I don't know who else we would have to work with. Any suggestions?
not cheats, or ppl who exploit of course!
Ahh... you mean those sort of people. Well I personally do not consort with those types, and have left 2 alliances already for such things. Once I was in a position of power in TSA and I found out about these types I didnt leave the group, instead I kicked them out and punished them myself.
Posted: Fri Mar 09, 2007 2:00 pm
by Alabrax
[DDE] Bastion wrote:Change the name... its kinda... cheesy
LOL
This is pretty funny, and I do honestly mean this. I think its funny because when it comes to cheesy names... well that is the one thing we are following in your footsteps. C.O.P. I mean come on how more Cheesy can you get.
I am no real fan of the CIA name myself but thats what I am lumped in to.
Posted: Fri Mar 09, 2007 2:02 pm
by [DDE] Bastion
Alabrax wrote:[DDE] Bastion wrote:Change the name... its kinda... cheesy
LOL
This is pretty funny, and I do honestly mean this. I think its funny because when it comes to cheesy names... well that is the one thing we are following in your footsteps. C.O.P. I mean come on how more Cheesy can you get.
I am no real fan of the CIA name myself but thats what I am lumped in to.
Well, I didn't pick "CoP" either, but... I guess we all get used to it
Although I don't mind the name CoP... seeing that I want to be one possably
Posted: Fri Mar 09, 2007 2:15 pm
by SSG EnterTheLion
Alabrax wrote:SSG EnterTheLion wrote:Alabrax wrote:Oh and to address #3... I don't know who else we would have to work with. Any suggestions?
not cheats, or ppl who exploit of course!
Ahh... you mean those sort of people. Well I personally do not consort with those types, and have left 2 alliances already for such things. Once I was in a position of power in TSA and I found out about these types I didnt leave the group, instead I kicked them out and punished them myself.
indeed...I don't believe the epa alliances have any cheats but I do know that other alliances in the CIA are harbouring certain dodgy characters.
Re: CIA: What should be changed?
Posted: Fri Mar 09, 2007 2:18 pm
by Hansbrough
Alabrax wrote:I keep seeing people talk about how cowardly and weak CIA is.
Point and case, you have to resort to plagiarism.
Posted: Fri Mar 09, 2007 2:22 pm
by generaloneill
SSG EnterTheLion wrote:Alabrax wrote:SSG EnterTheLion wrote:Alabrax wrote:Oh and to address #3... I don't know who else we would have to work with. Any suggestions?
not cheats, or ppl who exploit of course!
Ahh... you mean those sort of people. Well I personally do not consort with those types, and have left 2 alliances already for such things. Once I was in a position of power in TSA and I found out about these types I didnt leave the group, instead I kicked them out and punished them myself.
indeed...I don't believe the epa alliances have any cheats but I do know that other alliances in the CIA are harbouring certain dodgy characters.
and tokra isnt a dodgy character?