Page 1 of 6
Further Developed Alliance Settings
Posted: Sat Mar 17, 2007 7:43 am
by Tanith
I have a suggestion regarding alliance administration. I think that it should be possible to either set as many 2nds as you want or (and more desireably) to give permissions out on a person, by person basis. Allowing new people into the alliance, removing them, alliance-wide messaging etc.. (Each permission can be given out individually to greater improve flexibility) This would mainly benefit those alliances that have High Councils or more than 2 people that should have admin powers.
I was also thinking about setting different ranks that the alliance could give out that would either go in place of your title (Supreme Commander, Fleet Commander, General, etc..) or in addition to it.
This would further develop what the alliance can actually do ingame as far as administration.
Edit: Grammatical corrections.
Posted: Sat Mar 17, 2007 8:10 am
by Tok`ra
Differnt ranks are nice.
Maybe allow allainces to set custom ranks/tittles for their members (and of course punish those that use inappropiate names)
And also allow the leader to set premissions too, but allow the leader tho pick each option for a person, that way lowgrade things like alliancewide PM could be allowed w/o giving that person the option to kick or allow people in, or disband.
Posted: Sat Mar 17, 2007 3:05 pm
by Teal'auc of the Void
I like the suggestion. 
Teal'auc
Posted: Sat Mar 17, 2007 3:15 pm
by plm2
i friggin love it.
Posted: Mon Mar 19, 2007 4:41 am
by Tyicius
Great idea! I love it
Posted: Mon Mar 19, 2007 5:00 am
by Zeratul
lets bring it in... looks like a great addition...
Posted: Mon Mar 19, 2007 11:03 am
by Predator
yeh great idea
Posted: Mon Mar 19, 2007 12:13 pm
by Lord Rylan
very good idea, could also have the ability for alliance members to see if eachother are online. I love the idea of having custom ranks and the ability to assign permissions.
Posted: Mon Mar 19, 2007 12:39 pm
by deadeye
I like it, but admin would have to fix the alliance message problem where the leader's name is used when the 2nd sends the message.
Posted: Mon Mar 19, 2007 1:18 pm
by Bull-E
good idea, however there would need more "low levels" (for lack for a better word
) then 2nds
maybe a only a certain % of the total membership can be 2nds
Posted: Mon Mar 19, 2007 1:24 pm
by Tivadar
don´t see anything useless on this suggestion, so i´m with it
Posted: Mon Mar 19, 2007 1:42 pm
by ~Phoenix~
I must say I got to love this
Especially the fleet commander stuff etc
Posted: Mon Mar 19, 2007 2:04 pm
by GeneralChaos
Yes i agree, i also think the idea of anyone in the alliance being able to see the power of everyone, like the Leader and 2nd can, just means ud have to trust everyone in your alliance.
Posted: Mon Mar 19, 2007 7:12 pm
by Lord_Zeus
nice idea, why not have it so everyone in the alliance can send an alliance wide message? if they spam they'll simply get kicked out of the alliance... or have it set by the alliance leader
Posted: Tue Mar 20, 2007 2:22 am
by GeneralChaos
Well to prevent that the alliance leader could set permissions for users that they want.