Could a mod define SGW General ?
Posted: Sat Apr 28, 2007 7:32 am
Since ingame based topics get moved, it would be nice to have guidelines so we know what is valid, as just talking about the game obviusly is not enough.
These are the forums for the GateWa.rs family of text-based space-centred PBBGs
https://talk.gatewa.rs/

geisha wrote:Edited out since geisha doesnt want tobe seen cursing at a user in public it seems.Tok`ra wrote:Can you move that thread back, valid GENERAL SGW thread.
StarGateWars General
Forum for all general ingame discussion.
StarGateWars General
Forum for all general ingame discussion that is popular
Tok`ra wrote:The fact of the matter is, at the bare minimum, general should be for ANYTHING INGAME not suitable for Gal Col.
geisha wrote:Tok`ra wrote:The fact of the matter is, at the bare minimum, general should be for ANYTHING INGAME not suitable for Gal Col.
Basically yes. But what's the point in opening new threads about any CoP / CIA issue every 30 minutes? What's the point in making pointless polls about who you think CIA will mass next? Propaganda?
Seriously, what you want isn't discuss ingame things, what you want is to cause more trouble and make sure the CoP and CIA conflict never ends.
I think this is stupid and every new topic started about CIA/COP will only lead to more flaming and won't serve any purpose at all.
geisha wrote:Tok`ra wrote:The fact of the matter is, at the bare minimum, general should be for ANYTHING INGAME not suitable for Gal Col.
Basically yes. But what's the point in opening new threads about any CoP / CIA issue every 30 minutes? What's the point in making pointless polls about who you think CIA will mass next? Propaganda?
Seriously, what you want isn't discuss ingame things, what you want is to cause more trouble and make sure the CoP and CIA conflict never ends.
I think this is stupid and every new topic started about CIA/COP will only lead to more flaming and won't serve any purpose at all.
~Phoenix~ wrote:
It isnt only them though, I didnt see any mention of cop/cia threads in this topic until then.
~Phoenix~ wrote:geisha wrote:Tok`ra wrote:The fact of the matter is, at the bare minimum, general should be for ANYTHING INGAME not suitable for Gal Col.
Basically yes. But what's the point in opening new threads about any CoP / CIA issue every 30 minutes? What's the point in making pointless polls about who you think CIA will mass next? Propaganda?
Seriously, what you want isn't discuss ingame things, what you want is to cause more trouble and make sure the CoP and CIA conflict never ends.
I think this is stupid and every new topic started about CIA/COP will only lead to more flaming and won't serve any purpose at all.
It isnt only them though, I didnt see any mention of cop/cia threads in this topic until then.
geisha wrote:~Phoenix~ wrote:
It isnt only them though, I didnt see any mention of cop/cia threads in this topic until then.
The reason Tok'ra started this thread was because I have moved another Anti-CIA propaganda thread to the temple of spam.
I'm just sick of it.
geisha wrote:~Phoenix~ wrote:
It isnt only them though, I didnt see any mention of cop/cia threads in this topic until then.
The reason Tok'ra started this thread was because I have moved another Anti-CIA propaganda thread to the temple of spam.
I'm just sick of it.
Flavar wrote:1. First i agree that we need a definition.
2. Second i am stil in the development defintion of what is allowed here from me.
3. There are other mods that have more to say.
---> its a valid question and as mod and as player i would welcome a clearer definition
---> i will post in the mod forum about it