Page 1 of 3
Discussion: Which allaince/neutral party will be hit next.
Posted: Mon Apr 30, 2007 7:48 am
by Tok`ra
Despite the topics constantly being moved/locked and people saying it wont happen, a neutral party WAS targeted in the war by CiA members.
So, who do y'all think is next to be hit ?
Personaly, my monets on an excuse being found to expand the war to fahQ/fahQtoo
Posted: Mon Apr 30, 2007 7:52 am
by Raven
Dude you really should stop making this ridiculous threats CIA wasnt hitting FAQH Svarun wants to hit a single person because she is helping ......and i did nothing yet but if i will it has nothing to do with CIA so stop this nonsense...
Posted: Mon Apr 30, 2007 7:54 am
by Mathlord
Just let Tokra be...it's his own way of making propaganda...pity that it won't help you or your alliance.
There is no way to make us the bad guys here, we're just doing something we should have done a long time ago.
Posted: Mon Apr 30, 2007 7:55 am
by traprunner
Stop flaming Tokra. This has nothing to do with CIA at all.
Practically every thread I have read from you recently has to do with CIA hitting people. ALL were unfounded. Sometimes you say that people told you this and that. Maybe people tell you untruths because they know that you have a mouth and repeat everything and so they wont tell you the truth.
Posted: Mon Apr 30, 2007 7:55 am
by Quina Quen
Raven wrote:Dude you really should stop...
Soon enough, there'll be so many colourful Tok'ra threads that the adminsitration will be forced to rename this section the 'General Tok'ra Discussion'. Every body shall squirm and rejoice in greatly unbalanced proportions.
What was the topic about? Some war or something?
Posted: Mon Apr 30, 2007 7:56 am
by Tok`ra
Raven wrote:Dude you really should stop making this ridiculous threats CIA wasnt hitting FAQH Svarun wants to hit a single person because she is helping ......and i did nothing yet but if i will it has nothing to do with CIA so stop this nonsense...
Collaborating with COP - puts you on a war list
[ Goto pageGoto page: 1, 2 ] 22 SVaRuN
Seems like its based off of CiA/CoP war politics to me..........
Howcome you didnt call it 'mass my freind I mass you' then ?
Because that wasnt the real reason prehaps
Posted: Mon Apr 30, 2007 8:05 am
by Pungemo
Isn't this more than slightly hypocritical considering what high empty just said?
Posted: Mon Apr 30, 2007 8:08 am
by Lord Dougy
this should be in The Galactic Colosseum shouldnt it?
and the majority of sgw isnt in the war!! majority of the power of sgw is effected by it but power ingame has no direct effect on forum power, my point is that this is spam as most ppl dont care and from the sounds of it the CIA dont as well!
stop making topics constantly....
Posted: Mon Apr 30, 2007 8:09 am
by traprunner
Lord Dougy wrote:this should be in The Galactic Colosseum shouldnt it?
and the majority of sgw isnt in the war!! majority of the power of sgw is effected by it but power ingame has no direct effect on forum power, my point is that this is spam as most ppl dont care and from the sounds of it the CIA dont as well!
stop making topics constantly....
I made a roundabout way of saying that...lol
Well done for clearing it up
Tok'ra = Spam
Posted: Mon Apr 30, 2007 8:11 am
by Tok`ra
Gal Col = war discussion
This thread = DISCUSSION in a GENREAL way what MIGHT happen next in the game.
Posted: Mon Apr 30, 2007 8:18 am
by Pungemo
I take it more as a kind of insight into how tok'ra's mind doesn't work....
Tok'ra make thread.
Thread moved.
Tok'ra make same thread.
Thread moved.
Tok'ra make same thread....
...and so on, and so forth. Eventually I suspect the tok'ra may learn and maybe change the wording around slightly, but best not to hold one's breath.
Posted: Mon Apr 30, 2007 8:50 am
by Lord Dougy
actually i ended up at the conclusion that its spam
maybe i should start a thread saking if its better if lord dark is a better name that lord dougy.... its a valid discussion topic which like this topic would be moved to spam where it belongs
Posted: Mon Apr 30, 2007 8:54 am
by Juliette
Jadzia - "Why is it called 'anti-CIA-propaganda' 5?"
Tok'ra - "Anti-CIA-propaganda's 1, 2, and 3 were moved and deleted. Number 4 vanished without a trace 24 hours after posting. To this day, no one knows what happened to it."
Jadzia - "Swell."
Re: Discussion: Which allaince/neutral party will be hit nex
Posted: Mon Apr 30, 2007 9:08 am
by Cole
Tok`ra wrote:Despite the topics constantly being moved/locked and people saying it wont happen, a neutral party WAS targeted in the war by CiA members.
So, who do y'all think is next to be hit ?
Personaly, my monets on an excuse being found to expand the war to fahQ/fahQtoo
Why not a topic what next CoP will hit because of suspecting/proving help toward CIA?
Btw the topic made by Svarun has nothing special, it's only directed at those who help CoPs as they not neutral
I do not see
ANYTHING odd there!
Posted: Mon Apr 30, 2007 9:14 am
by [KMA]Avenger
hey all,
i haven't posted on the forum for a while but judging from the posts and threads around here...i haven't missed anything
hey wes, still walking around on ya hands and talking out the wrong end i see