Page 1 of 3
Ranks by armysize
Posted: Fri Jun 08, 2007 12:20 pm
by Omoc
I was thinking how rank is silly, since it does not tell anything...
So why not making ranks by armysize... That way they would actually mean something, since armysize IS one of the most important things when deciding the power of individual...
However, there is one problem that we would have to solve if this would come into game... ascending, G&R.
Just let me know what you think about idea otherwise.. and i'm sure we can find out a way to get G&R.
Re: Ranks by armysize
Posted: Fri Jun 08, 2007 1:14 pm
by owencraig-
How then would raiding work??. There would be no way to drop rank to raid short of selling UU but that would be defeting the purpose of the raiding. For those that can no longer buy UU after they get to 50mill raiding or a huge UP is the only way to grow faster. Sorry i for one just dont see how your idea would work.
Re: Ranks by armysize
Posted: Fri Jun 08, 2007 1:17 pm
by Bluefox21
and would be very hard to sort out the top with the cap on...
Re: Ranks by armysize
Posted: Fri Jun 08, 2007 8:41 pm
by Dagr
And G&R, no newer players would ever get high enough to get it. The large players would keep growing making the gap wider.
Re: Ranks by armysize
Posted: Fri Jun 08, 2007 10:45 pm
by Timmy
i'm all for adding a stats which combines army size raw and total up to give an influence like ascention.
but this would only be 1 stat there would still be 4 others to contribute to overall rank
Re: Ranks by armysize
Posted: Sat Jun 09, 2007 12:11 am
by Omoc
That is kinda out of my suggestion 
but as it was said before, my suggestion is hard or een imposible to realized. So your suggestion would give a bit more real look on the rankings...
Make t opic on it and a poll 
Re: Ranks by armysize
Posted: Sat Jun 09, 2007 4:25 am
by BL1P
it would be better too use actual power
ie the same power that the aliance leader sees on the aliance page thing
that shows a better overall ranking type thing
Re: Ranks by armysize
Posted: Sat Jun 09, 2007 7:35 am
by Zeratul
how about having 2 rankings lists?
1. rankings by power
2. rankings by size
Re: Ranks by armysize
Posted: Sat Jun 09, 2007 7:39 am
by Omoc
Even better, but i doubt admin will alow that on his server...
Re: Ranks by armysize
Posted: Sat Jun 09, 2007 8:02 am
by Legendary Apophis
I dont like it...we are not in the ascended server with the in...
sorry can't tell it
Re: Ranks by armysize
Posted: Sat Jun 09, 2007 8:38 am
by Blackburn
Zeratul wrote:how about having 2 rankings lists?
1. rankings by power
2. rankings by size
I agree with you there, that would be very nice.
Re: Ranks by armysize
Posted: Sat Jun 09, 2007 8:42 am
by Legendary Apophis
Biggest army sizes will hold top ranks without any difficulties and otehers would never catch up..
Re: Ranks by armysize
Posted: Sat Jun 09, 2007 9:25 am
by Blackburn
Åpophis ™ wrote:Biggest army sizes will hold top ranks without any difficulties and otehers would never catch up..
Well, that doesnt really care, It is funb for the smaller players to see how fast they have grown in army and in armyrank.
Re: Ranks by armysize
Posted: Sat Jun 09, 2007 10:18 am
by Zeratul
Åpophis ™ wrote:Biggest army sizes will hold top ranks without any difficulties and otehers would never catch up..
that is why we suggested the below... that ranking wouldnt affect g&r income, and it would only show how far they have progressed... after all, there would be quite a few with same rank...
Zeratul wrote:how about having 2 rankings lists?
1. rankings by power
2. rankings by size
Re: Ranks by armysize
Posted: Sat Jun 09, 2007 2:36 pm
by Legendary Apophis
[Alpha]Blackburn wrote:Åpophis ™ wrote:Biggest army sizes will hold top ranks without any difficulties and otehers would never catch up..
Well, that doesnt really care, It is funb for the smaller players to see how fast they have grown in army and in armyrank.
Well I want to get 5 G&R per turns when my exams are done so it wouldnt be ok with me hence I dont like it
Zeratul wrote:Åpophis ™ wrote:Biggest army sizes will hold top ranks without any difficulties and otehers would never catch up..
that is why we suggested the below... that ranking wouldnt affect g&r income, and it would only show how far they have progressed... after all, there would be quite a few with same rank...
Zeratul wrote:how about having 2 rankings lists?
1. rankings by power
2. rankings by size
Cool that's better than other idea.