Page 1 of 1
merc techs dont increase my 1:1 ratio
Posted: Wed Jun 13, 2007 2:00 pm
by kvarga
new update wrote:The 1 to 1 ratio DOES increase with your merc tech (so for example a 10% merc tech would allow you to have 11 merc for 10 supers or 1:1.1 ratio)
I have all my 8 merc tech level, but i'm not allowed to buy more attack mercs than my super attackers.
I dont have much def mercs, so not the total mercs limit prevents me doing that.
Am I wrong?
Re: merc techs dont increase my 1:1 ratio
Posted: Wed Jun 13, 2007 3:52 pm
by TheWay
check the other post in the bugs area calleds mercs it has info regarding this and so there is no need for anyone else to reply to this
Re: merc techs dont increase my 1:1 ratio
Posted: Wed Jun 13, 2007 4:10 pm
by kvarga
Yeah, this update has two part. The one that is about the merc limit paired to your super att/def troops. That other topic was about the limit.
But the 2nd part of the update says that this 10 merc for 10 super can be increased via merc tech levels. +1 merc/10 super for each merc tech level. If I read it correctly. That means if I have merc tech levels, I can buy more att mercs than my super attackers! If not, please explain that sentence quoted by me above!
Re: merc techs dont increase my 1:1 ratio
Posted: Wed Jun 13, 2007 8:48 pm
by Spacey
I think he means that that topics is about the merc update, the whole part and problems, not that one is specific, I agree
I don't know the answer to help you, but please move over questions there
Re: merc techs dont increase my 1:1 ratio
Posted: Wed Jun 13, 2007 10:54 pm
by Bazsy
Well, the maximum merc tech gives you 105%, which means for 100 supers you should have 105mercs of that type. So that would be 1.05/1
Now at game updates it tells us, we get a lot more bonus:P 10% incr/ merc tech. That would be 1.8/1 for LG+1 and above...
And the merc market states that:
"ADDITIONALLY - each Merc (attack or defence) is paired with a 'super soldier' (attack or defence). This means that you can only have as many attack/def Mercs as you have supers of that type."
I say we have a major confusion here. And this is indeed a bug exept if the merc market has the truth from the 3 version:)