StarGateWars Forums

Hi,

I've noticed with allot of wars speciaal this dimension of age of this game wars are getting longer and longer.

With long term wars I don't speak from a week but more than weeks.
And it ruins relations between diffrent people from both allainces. It's wrong and some have complained about those long term wars.

stalemate , farm fest , boringdom words are the mose used names for those kinds of war. Their have been several suggestions to resolve those war problems.

Some were not usefull some were but Allaince didn't look after them. I have thougt about it a long this since the first long term war was in place.

[color=#2277DD]My suggestion is Votings . Will explain

We can select 9 or 11 diffrent Allaince leader (active allaince leaders)
they can vote anymouse in a diffrent secured area on this forum.

those leaders can vote for losing/winning from allaince in long term wars like I told anymouse. why 11 or 9 and not 10 is not to have a drawn.

this can reduce long term wars into more playable wars without , Flaming ,abusive behaviour , etc etc

This can also resolve allainces surrender terms ...

More often u see more demands that are useless and offend the Allaince leader u war with . also those anymouse leaders can set surrending terms [/color]

---------------------

I came up with that I putted a vote , if u got suggestions to put or add things to this one pls feel free and also I ask pls don't let this become into spam or flaming we as players AS A COMMUNITY can make things allot more better and playable to gain more fun !


Regards , Privium

Changed type of blue color to make it easier to read...

Interesting idea, but suggestions forum is \/ way.

I'm sure you'll get more comments when a mod moves this.

Privium can you change the colour of that blue.. It is near impossible to read.. Cheers mate but yes very interesting idea..

moved

My only problem with voting would be if you get an unpopular alliance that everyone dislikes, many alliance leaders might say they lost the war just so they have to pay reparations, etc. Or, if a very popular alliance was at war the same might happen only saying they were the winners.

I personally don't really like the idea because of that. Certain people might be moved certain ways depending on personal feelings, especially since it's anonymous and no one has to say how they voted. Also, to take into account that certain alliances are allied with other alliances, you could possibly have allies voting for allies even though it might be obvious that they lost.

True Boober ,

But those 9 anymouse are leaders of allainces , so I do exspect if this go well they act honestly.

that mean instead of flaming war topic's is putting damage u have done on the allaince so they can see witch allaince is more worthy.

but than with the damage we have another problem -> allaince B has what 20 trill in power and allaince A 10 trill .

it's obv that allaince A will do more damage but than it's possible to take 5/10 from the damage done by allaince A that mean we look to allaince B that also has 10 trill in power ...

also it doesn't have to be allaince leaders it also can be neutral players that play's as lone wolf .