Page 1 of 1
Could be Multies
Posted: Tue Aug 28, 2007 6:49 pm
by Shalak
this may not be anything but its better to be safe then sorry.
we have reason to belive that Failure (62146), jackass0 (83584) and imbecile (92364) are the same person.
the only evidence we have is that they were massing a member and we noticed that Imbecile had a 50K UP and no miners at all. we just found it odd that he had a large up and no miners, which lead us to believe he is a multi.
If he/they are not multies then we apologise.
We would just rather be safe then sorry.
Shalak
Re: Could be Multies
Posted: Tue Aug 28, 2007 9:07 pm
by Zeratul
just curious, what makes you think the other 2 are multies as well?
Re: Could be Multies
Posted: Tue Aug 28, 2007 10:04 pm
by Shalak
they all came at us at the same time. it just seems a little off, and the other guy must be getting funding from somewhere
Re: Could be Multies
Posted: Wed Aug 29, 2007 12:39 am
by smiley
I suspect these to be multi's. If not I' sorry.
Sub Commander Logica -19191
Hoppo rank: 22,266 -19194
Smatty rank: 22,513 -19197
snaily rank: 22,529 -19196
All close rank
Bottom three are officers of Logica
Close id
Re: Could be Multies
Posted: Thu Aug 30, 2007 5:00 pm
by formerly adminMark
Hello smiley,
These accounts don't appear to be multi's they do appear to be abandoned though.
adminMark
smiley wrote:I suspect these to be multi's. If not I' sorry.
Sub Commander Logica -19191
Hoppo rank: 22,266 -19194
Smatty rank: 22,513 -19197
snaily rank: 22,529 -19196
All close rank
Bottom three are officers of Logica
Close id
Re: Could be Multies
Posted: Thu Aug 30, 2007 10:25 pm
by Sphinx42
adminMark wrote:Hello smiley,
That's why it is good to know when to get your own thread
Re: Could be Multies
Posted: Sun Sep 02, 2007 5:17 pm
by Shalak
Ah, how is it that i posted this and then smilie posts his accusations and he gets answered before me? seems kinda rough
Shalak wrote:this may not be anything but its better to be safe then sorry.
we have reason to belive that Failure (62146), jackass0 (83584) and imbecile (92364) are the same person.
the only evidence we have is that they were massing a member and we noticed that Imbecile had a 50K UP and no miners at all. we just found it odd that he had a large up and no miners, which lead us to believe he is a multi.
If he/they are not multies then we apologise.
We would just rather be safe then sorry.
Shalak